Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
oj got acquitted
- Thread starter CN1
- Start date
FreakMonster
New member
I knew he would get off, What a piece of shit!!!!
I think we should try and frame him ourselves so he can go back to jail where he belongs!!
I think we should try and frame him ourselves so he can go back to jail where he belongs!!
FreakMonster
New member
Badkins21 said:FreakMonster: I think some guys named Furman and Vanadder (sp.?) beat you to it, man...
I'm still waiting for e-mail regarding my post on the other "O.J." thread...
So you think Furman framed OJ? And that OJ is innocent?
Like I said, in the other thread, if anyone can e-mail me THREE good reasons that the jury in the CRIMINAL trial should have voted guilty, BEYOND a reasonable doubt, that are backed by actual evidence collected by the LAPD, I will send you a crisp, $20 bill.
I anxiously await them...
**Note: I have no opinion as to whether O.J. "did it," or not...
I anxiously await them...
**Note: I have no opinion as to whether O.J. "did it," or not...
FreakMonster
New member
1. DNA-The tests indicated that the drops had three factors in common with Simpson's blood and only one person in 57 billion could produce an equivalent match. In addition, the blood was found near footprints made by a rare and expensive type of shoe—shoes that O. J. wore and that proved to be his size.
2. Size 12 Bruno Magli shoes-William Bodziack, an FBI agent and one of the country’s most foremost experts on shoe print impressions, testified that the prints were left by Bruno Magli shoes, style Lorenzo, incorporating a Silga sole with a waffle-type print. The footwear, manufactured in Italy, retailed for $160 per pair and was sold by only 40 retailers across America. In all, only 300 pairs of size 12 (Simpson’s size) were ever sold. Only 9% of the population wore size 12
3. O.J. Simpson had purchased a single-edged knife prior to the murders.
4. Fibers and Hairs-Doug Deedrick, another FBI agent and a hair and fiber forensic expert, testified on the hairs found on Goldman’s shirt and inside the knit cap discovered at the crime scene. He testified that the hairs on the cap and 12 hairs recovered from the shirt were consistent with the characteristics of Simpson’s hair. He identified hair found on the Rockingham glove as compatible to Nicole’s and Goldman’s.
He testified that blue/black cotton fibers found on Goldman’s shirt matched the fibers in the socks found in Simpson’s bedroom. He affirmed that cashmere fibers which were removed from the knit hat, matched with fibers from the glove lining. He had also examined fibers removed from the Ford Bronco and found that they matched fibers found on the glove discovered at Simpson’s house and on the knit cap found at the crime scene. It didn’t seem to impress the jury
2. Size 12 Bruno Magli shoes-William Bodziack, an FBI agent and one of the country’s most foremost experts on shoe print impressions, testified that the prints were left by Bruno Magli shoes, style Lorenzo, incorporating a Silga sole with a waffle-type print. The footwear, manufactured in Italy, retailed for $160 per pair and was sold by only 40 retailers across America. In all, only 300 pairs of size 12 (Simpson’s size) were ever sold. Only 9% of the population wore size 12
3. O.J. Simpson had purchased a single-edged knife prior to the murders.
4. Fibers and Hairs-Doug Deedrick, another FBI agent and a hair and fiber forensic expert, testified on the hairs found on Goldman’s shirt and inside the knit cap discovered at the crime scene. He testified that the hairs on the cap and 12 hairs recovered from the shirt were consistent with the characteristics of Simpson’s hair. He identified hair found on the Rockingham glove as compatible to Nicole’s and Goldman’s.
He testified that blue/black cotton fibers found on Goldman’s shirt matched the fibers in the socks found in Simpson’s bedroom. He affirmed that cashmere fibers which were removed from the knit hat, matched with fibers from the glove lining. He had also examined fibers removed from the Ford Bronco and found that they matched fibers found on the glove discovered at Simpson’s house and on the knit cap found at the crime scene. It didn’t seem to impress the jury
Last edited:
1-The exact amount of blood found in O.J.'s Bronco + what was found at the site was the SAME amount missing from the vial the LAPD was in "possession of" for several hours, before logging it in at the station. It could have passed from any number of hands, two of the sure ones being...Furman and Vanadder. (DOUBT!)
2-No blood traces found on the shoes back at O.J.'s place...although in several different pictures, items such as his shoes appeared in different places, along with his socks...(DOUBT!)
3-The turned that knife in, in that infamous manilla envelope, as the trial first began...(DOUBT HE'D DO THAT IF IT HAD BLOOD ON IT, NO?!)
**See, don't think I'm saying "he's innocent." I'm saying:
1)The prosecutors sucked, 2)There was not enough evidence to convict him, and 3)There were aspects that fit the "framing" hypothesis.
We can't forget the time line inaccuracies, either...
(And, to add to mine, after you've added to yours, NONE of that "impressed the jury," due to the fact the defense always just happened to prove how ABSURD and incompetent the LAPD/District Attorney's Office was...which, inherently, does not = an acquittal, BUT, added to the facts presented in his defense, which were actually backed up by credible people...well, then you have a problem with a full-out conviction, due to HAVING TO PROVE YOUR CASE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT!!!)
Read books by EVERY single attorney, written after the trial--from both sides!--and call me in the morning. Also, go back and watch some of the trial...and how moronic Clark and Darden seemed.
The jury system is a good one...INNOCENT UNTIL **PROVEN** GUILTY...!!!
2-No blood traces found on the shoes back at O.J.'s place...although in several different pictures, items such as his shoes appeared in different places, along with his socks...(DOUBT!)
3-The turned that knife in, in that infamous manilla envelope, as the trial first began...(DOUBT HE'D DO THAT IF IT HAD BLOOD ON IT, NO?!)
**See, don't think I'm saying "he's innocent." I'm saying:
1)The prosecutors sucked, 2)There was not enough evidence to convict him, and 3)There were aspects that fit the "framing" hypothesis.
We can't forget the time line inaccuracies, either...
(And, to add to mine, after you've added to yours, NONE of that "impressed the jury," due to the fact the defense always just happened to prove how ABSURD and incompetent the LAPD/District Attorney's Office was...which, inherently, does not = an acquittal, BUT, added to the facts presented in his defense, which were actually backed up by credible people...well, then you have a problem with a full-out conviction, due to HAVING TO PROVE YOUR CASE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT!!!)
Read books by EVERY single attorney, written after the trial--from both sides!--and call me in the morning. Also, go back and watch some of the trial...and how moronic Clark and Darden seemed.
The jury system is a good one...INNOCENT UNTIL **PROVEN** GUILTY...!!!
Last edited:
hey badman, I am finally proud that someone here on this board can and will accurately tell others,,,,,,cause I have tried, what really happened, people forget that furman and vanadder were at the murder scene and OJ's house two hours before anyone else, and since nicole and OJ live like 3 minutes from each other, anyone can figure it out............do you think OJ is stupid enough to leave a bloody glove on his own property? and do people not think that.....that racist and white supremacist furman couldnt have easily found his way into oj's house takin his shoes or whatever the fuck he wanted!!!!!!! And they always ask, what about the blood in his bronco and at nicoles house.....they never want to realize that blood was tainted and missing from the lab...which was stolen and planted, and somehow mysteriously found its way to the back gate of nicoles house and his bronco...........its not a fuckin mystery.......they had no motive..no clues.....and no suspects.............furman....lets frame oj and with all the 911 calls and all the history, they cant prove him innocent, we will fuck him up.....plus he;s black, I will laugh all the way....coming from furman.
Sassy69
New member
Only in FL....
Everyone knows you go to Disney world or get stuck in a hurricane or get a killer tan. But did you know that in FL, you can:
- be the first person to die from anthrax in 25 years
- learn how to fly a small engine plane
- rent an apt to a famous terrorist
- make people question the 200 year old voting system
- a chad can be pregnant
- OJ can get acquited TWICE!
Its a great place where virtually anything is possible!
Everyone knows you go to Disney world or get stuck in a hurricane or get a killer tan. But did you know that in FL, you can:
- be the first person to die from anthrax in 25 years
- learn how to fly a small engine plane
- rent an apt to a famous terrorist
- make people question the 200 year old voting system
- a chad can be pregnant
- OJ can get acquited TWICE!
Its a great place where virtually anything is possible!
Similar threads
