i've used all 3, in my experience npp didnt bloat me out as much as deca but i still had a little bloat, and neither are anything like tren. Just my opinion
it depends bro, whats your stats? age, training history, bf, weight, height etc
Tren is a powerful drug which can have some serious side effects, and on the other hand it can give you some great results. Just depends if your ready for it or not
^^^ Yes Tren does not compare to NPP, I have tried both and liked the NPP but damn tren ace is unbeatable. I have run deca many times and NPP twice, completely different water retention, however with tren ace none...
You gotta try it out for your self bro.. It varies, just like with all other thing when it comes to aas. As I just learned myself in a recent thread, even something so simple as test works different in people
honestly this info isnt for me. Currently Im on test cyp 466mg/wk eq 466mg/wk tren enan 233mg/wk. I was never a fan of deca bc it bloats me too much but I have used it before.
My friend and work out partner has bad shoulders and is on test/primo/winstrol not really sure what his dosages are. He's very lean and shredded and wants to stay that way for the summer but between hockey the gym and manual labor his shoulders are bothering him more and more. I proposed to him to add some nandrolone into his cycle but he shot it down because of the bloating issue. then i told him some good things ive heard about npp. I was talking with a friend at the NY Pro show a few weeks ago and he told me he preferred it over tren ace thats why i threw out that comparison. I fugured them both being 19-nor test derivitives and synthetic steroids, perhaps there was something to that.
I consider it more of a fast acting DECA than anything.
Most people dont complain to much about bloat but sides
are easier to control with faster acting esters.