Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
My duty to you, dear reader, constrains me to the disagreeable and almost painful task of giving you a significant amount of information that you may be unwilling to accept. Without going into all the gory details, let's just say that EFLA's impetuous, unstable campaigns are in full flower, and their poisonous petals of diabolism are blooming all around us. This is one letter that EFLA doesn't want you to read. No wonder that EFLA has no great love for democracy or egalitarianism. But there's the rub; it's wishy-washy for EFLA to turn a deaf ear to need and suffering. Or perhaps I should say, it's temperamental.
The agenda that EFLA is attempting to advance is one of exclusionism, repression, and factionalism. I don't think anyone questions that. But did you know that none of its screeds changes my mind about anything? EFLA's emotionally biased and expletive-filled cop-outs push home the point that its tirades are not restrained by any moral scruples. The reason is clear. Its legates have learned their scripts well, and the rhetoric comes gushing forth with little provocation.
Not to be rude or anything, but griping about EFLA will not make it stop trying to create widespread psychological suffering. But even if it did, it would just find some other way to embark on wholesale torture and slaughter of innocent civilians. EFLA exhibits an overweening sense of entitlement and a predilection for depreciating others. Well, that's a bit too general of a statement to have much meaning, I'm afraid. So let me instead explain my point as follows: EFLA is inherently reckless, disrespectful, and snooty. Oh, and it also has an insolent mode of existence.
I definitely wouldn't want to guarantee the destruction of anything that looks like a vital community. I would, on the other hand, love to show principle, gumption, verve, and nerve. But, hey, I'm already doing that with this letter. I've already said this a thousand times and with a thousand different phrasings, but if EFLA thinks I'm too ill-bred to defy the international enslavement of entire peoples, it's sadly mistaken. I understand that EFLA's trained seals merely present their allegations as though they were true, a technique known as a "conclusory" or "Kierkegaardian" leap, but the only weapons EFLA has in its intellectual arsenal are book burning, brainwashing, and intimidation. That's all it has, and it knows it.
If we don't soon tell EFLA to stop what it's doing, it will proceed with its villainous, sordid complaints, considerably emboldened by our lack of resistance. We will have tacitly given EFLA our permission to do so. EFLA, in its hubris, has decided that it has the right to muddy the word "uncontradictableness". While this lighthearted statement adds sorely needed humor to an otherwise tense situation, the only way that we can fight it, the only way we can beat it, is to institute change. To top that off, I will never give up. I will never stop trying. And I will use every avenue possible to fight tooth and nail against EFLA. To recap the main points made in this letter: 1) EFLA respects nothing, honors nothing, and values nothing beyond itself, 2) it is piteous and more than subhuman to believe that EFLA's anecdotes can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality, and 3) the theoretical fallacies in EFLA's plans for the future run deep.
The agenda that EFLA is attempting to advance is one of exclusionism, repression, and factionalism. I don't think anyone questions that. But did you know that none of its screeds changes my mind about anything? EFLA's emotionally biased and expletive-filled cop-outs push home the point that its tirades are not restrained by any moral scruples. The reason is clear. Its legates have learned their scripts well, and the rhetoric comes gushing forth with little provocation.
Not to be rude or anything, but griping about EFLA will not make it stop trying to create widespread psychological suffering. But even if it did, it would just find some other way to embark on wholesale torture and slaughter of innocent civilians. EFLA exhibits an overweening sense of entitlement and a predilection for depreciating others. Well, that's a bit too general of a statement to have much meaning, I'm afraid. So let me instead explain my point as follows: EFLA is inherently reckless, disrespectful, and snooty. Oh, and it also has an insolent mode of existence.
I definitely wouldn't want to guarantee the destruction of anything that looks like a vital community. I would, on the other hand, love to show principle, gumption, verve, and nerve. But, hey, I'm already doing that with this letter. I've already said this a thousand times and with a thousand different phrasings, but if EFLA thinks I'm too ill-bred to defy the international enslavement of entire peoples, it's sadly mistaken. I understand that EFLA's trained seals merely present their allegations as though they were true, a technique known as a "conclusory" or "Kierkegaardian" leap, but the only weapons EFLA has in its intellectual arsenal are book burning, brainwashing, and intimidation. That's all it has, and it knows it.
If we don't soon tell EFLA to stop what it's doing, it will proceed with its villainous, sordid complaints, considerably emboldened by our lack of resistance. We will have tacitly given EFLA our permission to do so. EFLA, in its hubris, has decided that it has the right to muddy the word "uncontradictableness". While this lighthearted statement adds sorely needed humor to an otherwise tense situation, the only way that we can fight it, the only way we can beat it, is to institute change. To top that off, I will never give up. I will never stop trying. And I will use every avenue possible to fight tooth and nail against EFLA. To recap the main points made in this letter: 1) EFLA respects nothing, honors nothing, and values nothing beyond itself, 2) it is piteous and more than subhuman to believe that EFLA's anecdotes can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality, and 3) the theoretical fallacies in EFLA's plans for the future run deep.
