I was thinking more in terms of: (for instance)
On Monica Brant's web site she says that she does 60 minutes cardio in the morning and another 60 in the afternoon/evening. She's obviously one of those at the highest levels of the sport.
We have had lots of posts to newbies saying they should hit the weights more and do the cardio for a longer time and less frequently.
There are other posts saying do as little as you can and still get results, then when you no longer get the results, increase the duration or intensity. That if you kick it into full gear right off the bat, you will have nowhere to go when your body adjusts.
I've been training for approx 3 years now. I train 3 to 4 times/week, hardcore, and currently do cardio in the morning, prior to first meal, usually 6 days per week. Was doing 45 minutes, kicked it up to 60 this week for fun, prompted by the 30 + 30 NOT = 60 post. I'm at 18% b/f and still need to knock it down quite a bit to 12% or so in order to compete next fall. I'm still getting results from pretty much everything I do, just slow, of course. (I started at, if I remember right, about 44% b/f 3 years ago.) So.... given all the background info, if someone already seriously into the weight training like me does longer duration, would you still recommend to decrease the frequency of the cardio? Or would you say since I am already doing my cardio so frequently and am getting results, I actually should NOT be increasing the duration right now, for fear I won't have anywhere to go when I stop getting results?
Fennec