C
chaossurge
Guest
Did God love your dog?
javaguru said:Dog's don't have souls. Therefore, no love or heaven. Reason 356812 I'm an atheist.
I like that movie.mountain muscle said:Neither do humans.
We just have our disallusions.
BTW all dogs go to heaven.
Not if you're an evangelical....Jesus hates pets.heatherrae said:Doggies do so go to heaven. Do so. Do so. Do so.
So THERE!!!!
javaguru said:Dog's don't have souls. Therefore, no love or heaven. Reason 356812 I'm an atheist.
They have their own section of heaven fenced off. They think they are the only ones there. When you get to heaven, don't burst their bubble.javaguru said:Not if you're an evangelical....Jesus hates pets.
I need a scripture citationheatherrae said:They have their own section of heaven fenced off. They think they are the only ones there. When you get to heaven, don't burst their bubble.
You are mistaken, atheists don't believe in a God because there is no empirical evidence, we don't claim there is no God,just no evidence to believe in one. If I were given evidence that survived the scientific method then I would believe in one. It's a common logical fallacy that Atheism is a disbelief in a deity.chaossurge said:YOU couldn't possibly know that. It is your belief and part of your belief system anabolic steroids such, it is no more valid than any other religious or rational belief system.
You logically must admit.
Me, well, I am often asked what am I? I simply tell them that "I" am an empirical scientist.
By empirical standards, you simply have no basis to be an atheist except for your own leap of faith. Probably brought on by a personal experience, of which, can be discounted especially if it involved pedophilia.
The axe to grind, the ex who was overtly religious that swayed your personal thinking. All must be discounted on the search for the truth.
You cannot, empirically say, that there is no God. You could only Rationally say, (drawn on your biased viewpoints, cognition or whatever got you from ontological point A to epistemiological point B). Which, you must admit, is simply you.
So you, should not be the sole reason to believe in a philosophy if it were to be based on truth. You would have to discount you, in order to find the real truth devoid of your own biases.
Hence, rejecting your personal rationalisms, and understand empirical science.
WHich is just rationalism to a higher standard of reason
WAITTTT??? WTF, how did my retort ever get the words Anabolic Steroids in it?
Goddammit
javaguru said:You are mistaken, atheists don't believe in a God because there is no empirical evidence, we don't claim there is no God,just no evidence to believe in one. If I were given evidence that survived the scientific method then I would believe in one. It's a common logical fallacy that Atheism is a disbelief in a deity.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTZONIl546c
nefertiti said:Bomb. Don't fug with pet love. That's just a flat up asshole fucking move.
javaguru said:Not if you're an evangelical....Jesus hates pets.
I don't know but I would need a scripture citation. Colbert told me he had a pet monkey but I'm not sure.mountain muscle said:Not true.
Didn't he supposedly have 12 of them?
Judas has been smeared...mountain muscle said:Not true.
Didn't he supposedly have 12 of them?
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










