Ive been doing some research...... lets discuss....

[Themachine01]

I have ran T3 in the past a few times and even at 500mg test I tend to noticed slight muscle loss. Ive been researching why it is most popularly used with clen or HGH, mainly because either one will help fight the catabolic effects of the T3. I dont think that I will be running T3 again without clen or HGH anymore. The only thinkg that I dont like is the 2 week on 2 week off style of running clen, the 2 weeks off you will not be taking advantage of the anti-catabolic characteristics, this is one of the reasons why I had posted the question a few days ago about who runs clen straight through.

 

[Ulter]

Give it up. The muscle loss for a 2 or 4 week period will be so small you can easily make it up when you're done with T3. I am actually surprised you noticed it and you've got me wondering what you base the loss on.

 

[Themachine01]

Ulter, this post really wasnt meant to be about the 2 on 2 off cycling of clen, Im mainly curious as to if there are those that agree with me that T3 should not be ran without clen or HGH. Im most likely gonna run the clen 2 on 2 off, so theres no need for the "give it up" comment , im not trying to beat a dead horse here. I definately agree that if there is any muscle loss in the 2 weeks off period, than you can relate the loss to diet or training.

 

[Ulter]

OK but you said that you lost LM on test and I am saying that the amount you lose using T3 on a 2 week pyramid or a 4 week constant dose (the two most popular methods) you shouldn't lose enough to make any real difference. If you are using T3 without the test then clen and gh are going to have much more significant impact.

 

[Themachine01]

I agree.