M
madbomber31
Guest
or are we making sure when we do attack we take out everything possible to cut any ties with the leaders and their men that are in place throughout the world?
are we afraid of what retaliation may occur upon the attack?
i have concluded with very little doubt that iraq had a major part in the attacks... for the last 10 years all the chemical warfare talk has been revolving around iraq... now, after the terrorists strike we keep hearing of possible chemical retaliations agains the u.s. coincedence? i think not... now iran wont back us.... that means they back the taliban....
another possibility is we are actually already very deep into afghanistan with intelligence and special forces, but we wont have it reported to us due to tipping them off...
i admit, i am confused with the delay in attacks... iraq invaded kuwait and 3 days later we were fucking their world.
are we afraid of what retaliation may occur upon the attack?
i have concluded with very little doubt that iraq had a major part in the attacks... for the last 10 years all the chemical warfare talk has been revolving around iraq... now, after the terrorists strike we keep hearing of possible chemical retaliations agains the u.s. coincedence? i think not... now iran wont back us.... that means they back the taliban....
another possibility is we are actually already very deep into afghanistan with intelligence and special forces, but we wont have it reported to us due to tipping them off...
i admit, i am confused with the delay in attacks... iraq invaded kuwait and 3 days later we were fucking their world.

Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 











