Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

If the USA attacked Canada

According to one of them on this board they expect France to rush to their aid

LOL

Sounds like a good plan
 
Mexico. While all your troops would be busy up north, mexicans would take the opportunity, sneak in and take all your women. Oh wait, it's already happening..... lol
 
No. The British couldn't beause they are also allied with the U.S.. No one else has the power. Unless the Chinese & Indians form an alliance & decide the time would be opportune for them to attack.
This question bothers me my brothers.
Since the answer to U.S. Canadian warfare would be obvious, why even pose the question? As an ally who has stood by you, as a brother, why would you even consider attack?
 
HiDnGoD said:
Since the answer to U.S. Canadian warfare would be obvious, why even pose the question? As an ally who has stood by you, as a brother, why would you even consider attack?


because they are smarmy cockgobblers...too cocky for their own good. a little conquering would do save them from themselves. sometimes you must destroy the village in order to save it.
then to add insult to injury usa should conquer a few hundred more miles of mexico to create a buffer zone. we would put the land to better use then they have.
 
Ludendorf said:
because they are smarmy cockgobblers...too cocky for their own good. a little conquering would do save them from themselves. sometimes you must destroy the village in order to save it.
then to add insult to injury usa should conquer a few hundred more miles of mexico to create a buffer zone. we would put the land to better use then they have.
'bino? :Chef: :tuc:
 
Ludendorf said:
because they are smarmy cockgobblers...too cocky for their own good. a little conquering would do save them from themselves. sometimes you must destroy the village in order to save it.
then to add insult to injury usa should conquer a few hundred more miles of mexico to create a buffer zone. we would put the land to better use then they have.
You obviously have not lived in Canada. Most Canadians are not like that. Our only vice, well one of our few vices is jealousy at the wealth & power of our larger brother. & we elect politicans who are generally knobs.
Since the U.S. has no vices, I guess you are entitled to dictate to the world, no?
 
HiDnGoD said:
You obviously have not lived in Canada. Most Canadians are not like that. Our only vice, well one of our few vices is jealousy at the wealth & power of our larger brother. & we elect politicans who are generally knobs.
Since the U.S. has no vices, I guess you are entitled to dictate to the world, no?

i live about 2 hours from canada. spent a lot of time in ontario.
besides supeqt and oak the country is worthless.
we are entitled to dictate the world because you unruly fucks need to be told what's up. like having a strict football coach, it is for your own good.
someday when (and if) china suprasses us hegemony (sp) i gurantee the candain ass-kissers will be all over chinese wang.
 
HiDnGoD said:
You obviously have not lived in Canada. Most Canadians are not like that. Our only vice, well one of our few vices is jealousy at the wealth & power of our larger brother. & we elect politicans who are generally knobs.
Since the U.S. has no vices, I guess you are entitled to dictate to the world, no?


Bro, don't sweat it.

I don't know of any Americans that dislike Canadians. I think most would likely feel a sort of kinship. Aside from whatever momentary lapses caused by your leftist politicians when they seek to advance their own careers with anti American dribble.

Canada and Britian are about the only countries who could anticipate almost universal support were the US ever required to go to their aid, regardless of the circumstances.

I'll personally shoot the next president who tries to send us to wear in aid of France.
 
manny78 said:
Mexico. While all your troops would be busy up north, mexicans would take the opportunity, sneak in and take all your women. Oh wait, it's already happening..... lol


Hahaha. They bring their families with them. They don't want any part of American culture except its ability to offer them a better life, such as financially and for the education. And most are too busy with working two jobs that they barely have enough time to sleep.

I love Canada and they have defeated us already in our attempt to take them over. If we were to invade, the timing of the invasion would determine whether or not Canada would receive aid from other nations.

But I would not count on the French. Like I have said in the past, those guys can't fight their way out of a paper bag. Ask Germany.
 
i am what i am said:
Hahaha. They bring their families with them. They don't want any part of American culture except its ability to offer them a better life, such as financially and for the education. And most are too busy with working two jobs that they barely have enough time to sleep.

I love Canada and they have defeated us already in our attempt to take them over. If we were to invade, the timing of the invasion would determine whether or not Canada would receive aid from other nations.

But I would not count on the French. Like I have said in the past, those guys can't fight their way out of a paper bag. Ask Germany.

Napoleon Bonaparte would disagree with you.
 
Not that I would count on the French for anything, remember, through their history they have been where the U.S. is & they have been nothing. They've probably won as many wars as they've lost. They're on a downcycle right now. They've had to learn to live with losing. I pray that you never have to learn that lesson, 'cause it's not a pretty one.
 
Ludendorf said:
you think he would? last i knew germany got rudely removed from french soil


Thanks to America but this is neither here of there. As I recall the French people lined the streets to celebrate as American tanks rolled down them and American men were swarmed by French women.

May 12, 1940 Germany invaded France. Almost one month went by before Germany had seized Paris, June 14, 1940. Not very impressive for a such a superior nation now is it.
 
HiDnGoD said:
Not that I would count on the French for anything, remember, through their history they have been where the U.S. is & they have been nothing. They've probably won as many wars as they've lost. They're on a downcycle right now. They've had to learn to live with losing. I pray that you never have to learn that lesson, 'cause it's not a pretty one.


I agree. I hope America will never have to live that lesson. War sucks, but sometimes it is necessary. I wish it wasn't that way, but it seems like it will never go away.
 
i am what i am said:
I agree. I hope America will never have to live that lesson. War sucks, but sometimes it is necessary. I wish it wasn't that way, but it seems like it will never go away.
People can bitch about U.S., Brits, Canadians, Italians, whomever about being in this situation. But you can't just isolate yourself from the world & let it go to hell. These asshats out there need to be contained. I'm not even talking about Ideology or religion. I'm talking about regional stability, safety of the worlds citizens. There are others that need controlling too. Africa is way out of control.
But on the other hand, how do you teach people that still operate on a tribal level, when we can't even settle the racial harmony in our own schools & workplaces?
 
HiDnGoD said:
People can bitch about U.S., Brits, Canadians, Italians, whomever about being in this situation. But you can't just isolate yourself from the world & let it go to hell. These asshats out there need to be contained. I'm not even talking about Ideology or religion. I'm talking about regional stability, safety of the worlds citizens. There are others that need controlling too. Africa is way out of control.
But on the other hand, how do you teach people that still operate on a tribal level, when we can't even settle the racial harmony in our own schools & workplaces?


I agree with you 110%. Africa has many problems. It seems America throws these African nations money and leaves them to use it at their own discretion. The violence occurring over there is extreme as its based on hundreds of years of hatred. But we only stimulate these problems to grow by buying diamonds and selling them guns. As for the middle east, religion is suppose to be based on peace and proseperity for all people. There are extremes who have manipulated the meaning of this religion and who have used it to be where we stand today. But again, we preach tolerance yet cannot achieve it in our own society.
 
SoKlueles said:
id sure like to have their health insurance plans

haha. yeah, but the money has to come from somewhere to be able to give you those cheap plans.
 
i am what i am said:
I agree with you 110%. Africa has many problems. It seems America throws these African nations money and leaves them to use it at their own discretion. The violence occurring over there is extreme as its based on hundreds of years of hatred. But we only stimulate these problems to grow by buying diamonds and selling them guns. As for the middle east, religion is suppose to be based on peace and proseperity for all people. There are extremes who have manipulated the meaning of this religion and who have used it to be where we stand today. But again, we preach tolerance yet cannot achieve it in our own society.


this is what i don't get about africa...bono's campaign, bush's massive african aid package...it seems to my simpleton brain that we keep throwing money at africa in order to feel good about ourselves. but where does this money go?? is any progress made?? these questions are never asked by bono and other self-righteous spenders of our money
 
Oh goody. Another Canada vs US fight. Sigh.

Here's how it would play out. US would win. Canada would lose. People from both sides would move to each other sides. But, then terrorism would rise dramatically in the new US (Canada + US).

And QT would still be posting up nudie pics.
 
Ludendorf said:
this is what i don't get about africa...bono's campaign, bush's massive african aid package...it seems to my simpleton brain that we keep throwing money at africa in order to feel good about ourselves. but where does this money go?? is any progress made?? these questions are never asked by bono and other self-righteous spenders of our money


i agree with you on this
 
Phenom78 said:
Bro, don't sweat it.

I don't know of any Americans that dislike Canadians. I think most would likely feel a sort of kinship. Aside from whatever momentary lapses caused by your leftist politicians when they seek to advance their own careers with anti American dribble.

Canada and Britian are about the only countries who could anticipate almost universal support were the US ever required to go to their aid, regardless of the circumstances.

I'll personally shoot the next president who tries to send us to wear in aid of France.

I'd add Australia to the list of people we would aid in any situation.
 
redguru said:
I'd add Australia to the list of people we would aid in any situation.


Yeah them as well.

An unfortunate spill off from some inane fasacination with that crocodile guy.
 
Canada is the biggest safehouse in the world. Terrorists aren't attracted to it because it's too cold. Fuckin pussies the lot of 'em.
 
Phenom78 said:
Bro, don't sweat it.

I don't know of any Americans that dislike Canadians. I think most would likely feel a sort of kinship. Aside from whatever momentary lapses caused by your leftist politicians when they seek to advance their own careers with anti American dribble.

Canada and Britian are about the only countries who could anticipate almost universal support were the US ever required to go to their aid, regardless of the circumstances.

I'll personally shoot the next president who tries to send us to wear in aid of France.

I think you left out the Aussies and Japs, if fact Japan is probably a better ally then the most would think
 
My .02 on the French military and their contributions to getting the Germans out. P.S. its a joke

Si vous pouvez lire ces merci un enseignant. Si vous pouvez lire ceci remercie en français un Américain.
 
newbie210 said:
My .02 on the French military and their contributions to getting the Germans out. P.S. its a joke

Si vous pouvez lire ces merci un enseignant. Si vous pouvez lire ceci remercie en français un Américain.

Translates to

If you can read this thank a teacher. If you can read this in French thank an American. ;)
 
Ludendorf said:
this is what i don't get about africa...bono's campaign, bush's massive african aid package...it seems to my simpleton brain that we keep throwing money at africa in order to feel good about ourselves. but where does this money go?? is any progress made?? these questions are never asked by bono and other self-righteous spenders of our money
Back in the middle of the last century & before that, a lot of the European nations/empires had colonies in Africa. Relatively peaceful for the Africans, but when the colonialists pulled out, without a proper break in period for the Africans, they were left to their own devices, reverting to their tribalism.
 
HiDnGoD said:
Back in the middle of the last century & before that, a lot of the European nations/empires had colonies in Africa. Relatively peaceful for the Africans, but when the colonialists pulled out, without a proper break in period for the Africans, they were left to their own devices, reverting to their tribalism.


Us helping Africa is kinda like shoveling quicksand. Maybe they should just be left alone.
 
hanselthecaretaker said:
Canada is the biggest safehouse in the world. Terrorists aren't attracted to it because it's too cold. Fuckin pussies the lot of 'em.


I think you are very very mistaken. Canada just recently arrested nearly 17 suspected terrorists who had 3 x's the amount of explosives in their possession then what was used in the Oklahoma City bombing. No country is safe, even Canada
 
HiDnGoD said:
Back in the middle of the last century & before that, a lot of the European nations/empires had colonies in Africa. Relatively peaceful for the Africans, but when the colonialists pulled out, without a proper break in period for the Africans, they were left to their own devices, reverting to their tribalism.


I agree. European nations thought that to be a power house they needed to have colonies throughout the world. Hence, Africa became split into many pieces. But they fought hard for their independence and didn't want any help. I revert back to when America broke off from British rule and although we suffered from trade embargos and inflation, we eventually stuck it out and look at where we are today.
 
redguru said:
I'd say thank a Russian. If it weren't for the Eastern Front we would never have liberated France.
Aye, not so much thanking the Russians, but thankfull for their tenacity. Hitler was the moron that decided to open a second front line, & the Russians surprised him.
If Hitler hadn't attacked them & we had managed to beat the Bavarian Corporal, we woulda then had to fight the Russians.
Imagine the World dynamics today? We'd still be actively fighting that war. With spears & arrows, but still.
 
HiDnGoD said:
Aye, not so much thanking the Russians, but thankfull for their tenacity. Hitler was the moron that decided to open a second front line, & the Russians surprised him.
If Hitler hadn't attacked them & we had managed to beat the Bavarian Corporal, we woulda then had to fight the Russians.
Imagine the World dynamics today? We'd still be actively fighting that war. With spears & arrows, but still.


Hitler wasn't mistaken to invade Russia. They were intent on invading him as well. They were just buying time to get ready. He knew it.

And contrary to popular belief they could have won. They were screwed by being delayed several months cleaning up the Italians failures. If they hadn't been it could have likely resulted in a far different outcome.
 
HiDnGoD said:
Aye, not so much thanking the Russians, but thankfull for their tenacity. Hitler was the moron that decided to open a second front line, & the Russians surprised him.
If Hitler hadn't attacked them & we had managed to beat the Bavarian Corporal, we woulda then had to fight the Russians.
Imagine the World dynamics today? We'd still be actively fighting that war. With spears & arrows, but still.


Thank the Russian winter which held the advancing blitz krieg of the Germans at Bey.
 
Phenom78 said:
Hitler wasn't mistaken to invade Russia. They were intent on invading him as well. They were just buying time to get ready. He knew it.

And contrary to popular belief they could have won. They were screwed by being delayed several months cleaning up the Italians failures. If they hadn't been it could have likely resulted in a far different outcome.
The Italians didn't fail, they were just facing the Canadians. No chance. ;)
 
i am what i am said:
Thank the Russian winter which held the advancing blitz krieg of the Germans at Bey.

thank russias merciless leaders who were unfazed by the rediculously high casualites...
 
Ludendorf said:
thank russias merciless leaders who were unfazed by the rediculously high casualites...

20 million casualties, more than the total troop strength the US fielded during WW2.
 
i am what i am said:
I think you are very very mistaken. Canada just recently arrested nearly 17 suspected terrorists who had 3 x's the amount of explosives in their possession then what was used in the Oklahoma City bombing. No country is safe, even Canada

Were they actually looking to use those explosives in a Canadian city? If they did then that by itself is a legitimate reason to continue fighting the war on terror.
 
hanselthecaretaker said:
Were they actually looking to use those explosives in a Canadian city? If they did then that by itself is a legitimate reason to continue fighting the war on terror.
It appears, of the group, only a few were dedicated, although all were involved.
There was a list of possible objectives, though it hadn't been finalized. They had the supplies to make the bomb(s) & apparently had a training compound where people had heard guns firing.
That's enough for me
 
HiDnGoD said:
It appears, of the group, only a few were dedicated, although all were involved.
There was a list of possible objectives, though it hadn't been finalized. They had the supplies to make the bomb(s) & apparently had a training compound where people had heard guns firing.
That's enough for me


It would be far easier for them to lay dormant in Canada for preparations and such than the U.S. though too. They most likely would have used it on American soil.
 
hanselthecaretaker said:
Were they actually looking to use those explosives in a Canadian city? If they did then that by itself is a legitimate reason to continue fighting the war on terror.


It was for attacks in Canada from what I have read. Many Toronto and Montreal were targets.
 
hanselthecaretaker said:
It would be far easier for them to lay dormant in Canada for preparations and such than the U.S. though too. They most likely would have used it on American soil.
Some of the targets listed where Canadian Buildings on Bay St. in T.O., others In Montreal.
One of the miscreants wants to behead the P.M., although that appeared to be a pipe dream.
 
HiDnGoD said:
Some of the targets listed where Canadian Buildings on Bay St. in T.O., others In Montreal.
One of the miscreants wants to behead the P.M., although that appeared to be a pipe dream.


I forgot about the Prime Minister.

Every nation is a target.
 
Top Bottom