Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
hey gun people
- Thread starter p0ink
- Start date
B
BangedUp
Guest
casavant said:
good times...
Testosterone boy
New member
casavant said:
There is a group in Washington raising funds and hiring attorneys to look into the reckless slaughter of hapless appliances. It is thought that the more modern machines have chips, thus having a type of artificial intelligence that grants them certain unalienable rights.
I'd destroy the evidence.
Lao Tzu
New member
p0ink said:
lol. wait until 2004 when bushy renews the assault weapon ban. bush sr banned importation of assault weapons in 1989.
I am a liberal and i don't support gun control. You paint us all with the same brush.
As far as class C firearms, do you live in north carolina?
http://users.erols.com/rjm0222/firearm.htm
Pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 14-409 it is unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to manufacture, sell, give away, dispose of, use or possess machine guns, sub-machine guns, or other like weapons. A machine gun or sub-machine gun is one which shoots, or can be readily restored to shoot more than one round, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger. It also includes any frame or receiver of such a weapon, or parts used in converting a weapon into a machine gun or sub-machine gun. This prohibition does not apply to the following:
1. Banks, merchants, and recognized business establishments for use in their respective places of business. However, these persons must first apply to and receive from the Sheriff of the county in which their business is located, a permit to possess the weapon for the purpose of defending their business;
2. Officers and soldiers of the United States Army, when in the discharge of their official duties;
3. Officers and soldiers of the Militia and the State Guard when being called into actual service;
4. Officers of the State, or county, city or town, charged with the execution of laws of the State, when acting in the discharge of their official duties; and
5. The manufacture, use, or possession of such weapons for scientific or experimental purposes when such manufacture, use, or possession is lawful under federal laws and the weapon is registered with a Federal agency, and a permit to manufacture, use, or possess the weapon has been obtained by the Sheriff of the county in which the weapon is located.
Any bona fide resident of the state who now owns a machine gun used in former wars may retain and keep that weapon at his own property, as a relic or souvenir, without violating the provisions of this section, as long as he reports this weapon to the Sheriff of the county in which he lives.
Therefore, certain conditions must be met by the possessor of a machine gun before it may be lawfully kept in North Carolina. First, the possessor must fall within one of the specifically listed exceptions to the general prohibition of ownership. Second, one must also apply for a permit to possess the weapon from the Sheriff. It is then the responsibility of the Sheriff to satisfy himself as to the lawfulness of the reason for such possession and of the good moral character of the possessor. Among other considerations, the Sheriff should consider the inherent danger to the public as a result of the possession of a machine gun.
It has been consistently held within our office that the valid licensing of an individual to possess a machine gun under Federal law does not automatically legitimate his possession of the weapon in the various counties of North Carolina. Nor does such federal licensing require the Sheriff to issue a permit for the possession of such a weapon without first satisfying the prerequisites of G.S. 14-409. Therefore, the permit provisions of G.S. 14-409 would need to be complied with, even though a person is currently licensed under federal law to possess a machine gun.
Testosterone boy
New member
I fired an Uzi a few times. They are a kick in the pants.
BigRedCat
New member
Its allot easier to just pay the tax stamp on the Class 3 weapon. That is what I do. So you pay and extra 250 for every item purchased. People that can afford the costs of "assault weapons" can afford it. Yup the Uzi is fun, I fired a supressed uzi, it was.....nice. Sometimes I see the orginal Uzi built into the briefcase at gun shows. That is pretty bad ass. You can fire it from the handle.
Just buy an SKS or Mak-90. The latter is a AK-47 knockoff. Run about $300. Same price you can get a Tec-9 or Mac 11. But if you want fully auto, then you need to get a Class 3 license and pay the heavy tax on it. Shooting these semi auto assault rifles fast enough seems like fully auto 
Kalashnikov
New member
casavant said:
Actually Casavant, the term "assault weapon" is reserved for the type of firearm which you have just described, under the condition that it is equipped with a select-fire lever (usually full auto, semi, and safe).
This is a common mistake that most people make. A civilian AR-15 is not technically an assault rifle, while an M16A2 is.
Kalashnikov
New member
manny78 said:
Yes, the M16A2 is limited to three round burst because of studies made after the Vietnam war. The military wanted to prevent "spray and pray". The M16A2, being select fire, is classified as an assault rifle. The civilian AR-15 is not officially called an assault rifle.
Also the L1A1 self loading rifle is not considered an assault rifle here in the US. It is known as a battle rifle because of it's full size cartridge among other things.
Battle rifles: G3, US M14, M1 Garand, FAL etc all have full sized rifle cartridged.
Assault rifles: M16A1, A2, AK-47 series (AKM) intermediate cartridge with select fire.
This nomenclature comes from what I have heard and read, but I'm not sure that it's accurate. If anyone knows otherwise please correct me.
Similar threads
