supersizeme said:i guess i don't understand the owned part. his intention was to jump off the cliff and land in the water, which is what happened. owned would've been if he fell way short and hit land first and tumbled into the water.
supersizeme said:i guess i don't understand the owned part. his intention was to jump off the cliff and land in the water, which is what happened. owned would've been if he fell way short and hit land first and tumbled into the water.
supersizeme said:i guess i don't understand the owned part. his intention was to jump off the cliff and land in the water, which is what happened. owned would've been if he fell way short and hit land first and tumbled into the water.
casualbb said:Dudes.... it's owned because the guy fell 40 feet onto his SIDE
strangebrew said:Ownage would be what happend to my friend 8 years ago...Jumped off a 40 ft cliff and landed onto a moving boat.
strangebrew said:Ownage would be what happend to my friend 8 years ago...Jumped off a 40 ft cliff and landed onto a moving boat.
supersizeme said:i'm sorry, it's simply not ownage. we're throwing the owned term around too lightly these days. i won't stand for it any longer.
hardrock said:I wonder how deep it was there.
psychedout said:If you guys think landing on ur side like that wouldn't hurt like a biatch, your fucked up!
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










