Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Equipoise Experiences?

i tried it @500mg/week a while back along side some deca (300mg/week). for me it was a waste of money. i also shed the most hair ever next to winny from EQ. my personal experiences with it say...don't bother. others might not feel the same as me. obviously everybody is different and we all react to substances differently.
 
i've never seen anything great from it personally, but i am much leaner now than i have ever been and i am throwing it in at 800mg/week to see if it helps with the vascularity...plus its something i havent run in a while so i said what the hell.....but its not one of my favorite drugs
 
lacoste said:
One piece of advice, dont run it alone. Run it with some test, or kiss you sex drive good bye.
ive heard this is not the case. i'm am running it with proviron and tbol no test. ive been told the libido will stay the same from someone who ran the exact cycle. thats why most people take eq over deca
 
I've used for two cycles in the past. Loved it because it kinda seems to give you slow but "evenly" quality gains throughout your whole body. :chomp:
 
eq is very similar to primo except primo doesn't really shut you down and will not give you the hunger that eq does. the gains are very similar though. there is no reason to stack those two. you could stack with winny but your joints might not like it. i'd go with tbol or var to add to it
 
I have used it a few times and I like it at 500-650 mg a wk and I find you don't get much out of it unless you run it for at least 12 wks. I like stacking it with Test but would never run it alone or it would be a waste for me. I like Deca better when I'm bulking but when I leaning up I go with EQ.
 
gab9681 said:
EQ is one of the bases to every one of my cycles. I like it. It works well for me.

I think its a good base too, as well as test.

You can run it high and the estrogen conversion is roughly half that of testosterone.

Currently Running it at a gram a week - I eat everything in sight.
 
ive run at 400mg per week with great results

cant go wrong with 500mg test
400mg eq for 10-12 weeks
 
even though i had only 10 cc of it and ran it at 400mg for 5 wks, i still gained and kept 6 lbd..got really vascular and lean from it..

now i have 5 bottles of bd eq and plan on running it correctly, can't wait for the gains i will reap from it...along with tbol at 40mg /day
 
chilisauce1 said:
Anyone had any experience with Equipoise? Trying to read up and learn about it.

Thanks!

currently running it with dbol/test cyp 500wk/eq 600wk/winny
and loving it.
Eq makes me hungry, which is an expecially good thing when on cycle, helps to put those extra cals down.
 
Nytol2 said:
Ran at 600mg per week, absolute shit IMO. Most useless AAS I have tried, (and I've tried most).

I'm a fan of higher doses of EQ personally. But from most of the posts here on EF you probably set yourself up for dissapointment - it is overhyped.
 
Yeah, EQ is not test. Nobody gains miraculous amounts of mass from it. But it does do what it is supposed to do: small gains, little to no aromatization, increases appetite, increases hardness. It's not 'Dorian Yates' in a bottle. I use it as a bridge, when I don't want a full blown cycle and it works just fine for that. You just need to get into the 600-800mg a /wk range to really feel it. My .000002c
 
chilisauce1 said:
Anyone had any experience with Equipoise? Trying to read up and learn about it.

Thanks!

Used 600mg/week to cut one summer, can't figure out the big deal. Way over-rated IMO. Winny blows it out of the water.
 
Winny didn't do anything for me except help screw up my left elbow. Granted, you won't make big gains on eq, but if you like being hard and vascular, then it's a good choice. I like staying lean and hard, and so I love eq.
 
UA_Iron said:
I'm a fan of higher doses of EQ personally. But from most of the posts here on EF you probably set yourself up for dissapointment - it is overhyped.

I was not expecting a lot, I have a great deal of experience with most AAS, but was expecting something, and got nothing.

No hunger, or increased pumps.

I ran it with 750 test per week, and the gains I got were what I would have expected from the test alone.

It just made me aggitated and anxious towards the end of the course, which was not a nice feeling. I would never use it again.
 
Quiltie said:
Yeah, EQ is not test. Nobody gains miraculous amounts of mass from it. But it does do what it is supposed to do: small gains, little to no aromatization, increases appetite, increases hardness. It's not 'Dorian Yates' in a bottle. I use it as a bridge, when I don't want a full blown cycle and it works just fine for that. You just need to get into the 600-800mg a /wk range to really feel it. My .000002c


I agree that you need to take at least 600mg a wk to see good results and I would run it from 12 to 14 weeks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LT3
gtrcivic said:
even though i had only 10 cc of it and ran it at 400mg for 5 wks, i still gained and kept 6 lbd..got really vascular and lean from it..

now i have 5 bottles of bd eq and plan on running it correctly, can't wait for the gains i will reap from it...along with tbol at 40mg /day
that is what my cycle looks like as well tbol/eq but with some winny as well
 
Getting ready to start a EQ/Prop cycle next month. I haven't done EQ or prop in 2 0r 3 years but I have always loved the way EQ made me feel in terms of hardness and strength with no bloat, also the hunger pains made me eat more than when on other cycles without EQ. On a scale of 1-10 I give EQ a solid 8. Good luck bro.
 
Top Bottom