Evidence suggests the Philips curve is dead. Does this mean we can obtain lower inflation and lower unemployment?Using any of the demand management and/or supply policies at your disposal, what combination of policies would you recommend to the government in order to achieve a sustained reduction in unemployment and inflat? what, if any, are the problems with your recommendations?
No one seems to understand the new economy. Most companies use as many contract workers as they do employees. This helps them control their bottom line by giving them a variable labor supply. When a company lays off 500 employees that means it has probably NOT HIRED 1000 contractors. Greenspan sees the layoff of 500 as unemployed but not the 1000 not hired. Outsourcing has not necessarily killed the philips curve but it has made it much more difficult to understand. For example the democrats want to increase demand with a low income tax cut but they don't want to increase the supply by reducing capital gains. That is a recipe for stagflation.
.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No one seems to understand the new economy. Most companies use as many contract workers as they do employees. This helps them control their bottom line by giving them a variable labor supply. When a company lays off 500 employees that means it has probably NOT HIRED 1000 contractors. Greenspan sees the layoff of 500 as unemployed but not the 1000 not hired. Outsourcing has not necessarily killed the philips curve but it has made it much more difficult to understand. For example the democrats want to increase demand with a low income tax cut but they don't want to increase the supply by reducing capital gains. That is a recipe for stagflation.
.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










