Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
doc's prescription???
- Thread starter silver_shadow
- Start date
liftsiron
New member
HRT is just that, prescribed levels of test are only intended to match normal production levels. The study used deca which is weaker than test on a per mg basis. The reason why that steroids are used is because normal hormone levels are not doing the trick.
In order to add muscle beyond your normal limits higher level doses must be used. I recieved the same e-mail this morning as well, nothing new.
In order to add muscle beyond your normal limits higher level doses must be used. I recieved the same e-mail this morning as well, nothing new.
buckwheat1
New member
At 200mg/wk is probably not effective because:
- part of the deca is an ester which is not anabolic. So you must remove this from the 200mg/wk. I don't want to look it up so lets say that you end up with actual 175mg/wk of anabolics
- deca will probably shut down the natural produced test. So there is a net loss of 50-100mg/wk.
- testosterone mg per mg is stronger than deca.
When you add it all up, it seems like 200mg/wk would pretty much put at the same anabolic level as not having it at all. And if there was any anabolic advantage it would be so small that it would take longer periods of time to see if the difference.
If I increase my natural test production by 25% do you think that I would see significant difference in my body comp or stats over a 8 week period of time. Probably not. But if that 25% was maintained over a couple of years, then a difference would probably be noted.
- part of the deca is an ester which is not anabolic. So you must remove this from the 200mg/wk. I don't want to look it up so lets say that you end up with actual 175mg/wk of anabolics
- deca will probably shut down the natural produced test. So there is a net loss of 50-100mg/wk.
- testosterone mg per mg is stronger than deca.
When you add it all up, it seems like 200mg/wk would pretty much put at the same anabolic level as not having it at all. And if there was any anabolic advantage it would be so small that it would take longer periods of time to see if the difference.
If I increase my natural test production by 25% do you think that I would see significant difference in my body comp or stats over a 8 week period of time. Probably not. But if that 25% was maintained over a couple of years, then a difference would probably be noted.
gunner44
New member
buckwheat1
If you think that 200mg of deca weekly will will not be effective, you should define what you mean by effective. For some people who might be hypogonadic, than 200 mg weekly could make a HUGE difference. For a younger man, it would quickly shut down natural production, and the net benefit would be a LOWER test level.
Effective to a juice head is different from my idea of effective.
When someone says that a certain amount of juice is worthless, then they are only speaking from a juice heads perspective, not from the perspective of HRT.
I know that 150 to 200 mg of Test,Primo, EQ, Deca and or Proviron weekly can have a very profound effect on my body comp, appetite, endurance, and sexual performance.
Those are the GOOD things, the bad things are poor lipid profiles and accelerated hair loss for those prone to it, like me.
If you think that 200mg of deca weekly will will not be effective, you should define what you mean by effective. For some people who might be hypogonadic, than 200 mg weekly could make a HUGE difference. For a younger man, it would quickly shut down natural production, and the net benefit would be a LOWER test level.
Effective to a juice head is different from my idea of effective.
When someone says that a certain amount of juice is worthless, then they are only speaking from a juice heads perspective, not from the perspective of HRT.
I know that 150 to 200 mg of Test,Primo, EQ, Deca and or Proviron weekly can have a very profound effect on my body comp, appetite, endurance, and sexual performance.
Those are the GOOD things, the bad things are poor lipid profiles and accelerated hair loss for those prone to it, like me.
Similar threads
