Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Delete me

bump
 
MightyMouse69 said:

How is work going MM? A lot of people talking about the Pats?
 
all the whey said:
How is work going MM? A lot of people talking about the Pats?

to be honest, its more entertaining now if you like sports talk and stuff like that - I laff my balls off mostly.
 
MightyMouse69 said:
to be honest, its more entertaining now if you like sports talk and stuff like that - I laff my balls off mostly.

What are they saying? Who is taking the blame?
 
all the whey said:
What are they saying? Who is taking the blame?

1) Assante Samuel (missing the INT)

2) Bellidick - not kicking the FG

3) Offensive line (playing like swiss cheese)

Brady/Moss coming off like heroes - looks like Moss will be a franchise player in 08-09
 
MightyMouse69 said:
1) Assante Samuel (missing the INT)

2) Bellidick - not kicking the FG

3) Offensive line (playing like swiss cheese)

Brady/Moss coming off like heroes - looks like Moss will be a franchise player in 08-09

Brady is the Golden Child.

Moss deserves to be frachise player.

Did he take a pay cut? I know the pats only gave up a late round pick for him.
 
all the whey said:
Brady is the Golden Child.

Moss deserves to be frachise player.

Did he take a pay cut? I know the pats only gave up a late round pick for him.

From what I understand, you have no choice if you get the Franchise tag (I guess it is a fixed salary by position - currently 7.5 mil). If he gets taken, you have to give up a first rounder, so it will likely be that way.

They are saying Assante is gone.

Good news is Bruschi & Seau want to come back.
 
bump
 
PuddleMonkey said:
this thing still going?

This has totw writting all over it.
 
sorry guys; this thread is only for those who actually know about sports - not just say "your team sucks"

Qualifications are you need to know what offsides is.
 
samuels is top 5 corner in the league and also pretty young .. dude is awesome ...big mistake not to sign him ..seau and ted b are over the hill .. time to get younger on d
 
I would have done what belichick did and gone for it on 4and 13
the pats chances of making that were better than a 51 yard fg roulette roll
 
The defence was still functioning nicely at that stage. I'd have made the effort to pin them inside their own 10.
 
blut wump said:
The defence was still functioning nicely at that stage. I'd have made the effort to pin them inside their own 10.
the pats D did their job
it was the 14pt production out of the O that lost that game
and remember 1 pat TD was gifted to them on that pass interference on 3rd and goal from the 10
for sure there was definitely pass interference
but in reality it was a redzone stop by the giants D
 
pats offensive line played terrible .. giants killed them in the trenches
 
Spartacus said:
the pats D did their job
it was the 14pt production out of the O that lost that game
and remember 1 pat TD was gifted to them on that pass interference on 3rd and goal from the 10
for sure there was definitely pass interference
but in reality it was a redzone stop by the giants D
That's what I meant: rather than having the O try for a 4th and 13, he'd have been better to punt and try to pin the Giants near their own goal-line and trust the D to hold them there for an improved field position on the next possession. A 4th and 13 attempt cost momentum and maybe as much as 30 yards.

Both Ds played better than I expected.
 
bump
 
blut wump said:
That's what I meant: rather than having the O try for a 4th and 13, he'd have been better to punt and try to pin the Giants near their own goal-line and trust the D to hold them there for an improved field position on the next possession. A 4th and 13 attempt cost momentum and maybe as much as 30 yards.

Both Ds played better than I expected.
half of the time they do this they kick it in the endzone anyways for a touchback , .. i wanted a fieldgoal ..ne kicker is good
 
Kickers should get more reward for getting a ball inside the 20 and not dropping it into the endzone. On a punt, unlike a kickoff, all they have to do is get it to cross the sidelines. From the position they were in, a nice high kick would have allowed all of the runners to get in there and have a good chance of an excellent field position.

As I understand it, the kickers' grading system encourages end-zone punts since they are credited for the full-distance of the punt ignoring touchback.

A field-goal, putting points on the board, would be better. That comes down to the coach's call, though, and whether he trusts his O to get 13 yards more than he trusts his kicker to hit a 49-yarder. My vote is still with a productive precision punt.
 
One of the most puzzling decisions of the game is around the decision not to kick the FG in such a close game. Of course hindsight is 20/20.

Thanks to everyone here for talking sports rather than being a douchebag like many
 
Top Bottom