HansNZ
New member
I have often seen advice stating that when cycling, you should start your cycle with the most androgenic steroids first and finish with the weakest steroids (i.e. start with anadrol, then graduate to test/dbol, and end with nanodrolone and primobolan).
Apparently this type of cycle gives continuauous gains.
Obviously by ending with substances such as primobolan, you are more likely to consolidate and keep gains than would be the case if you ended a cycle with anadrol for instance.
My question is this: If you start with the strongest steroids, aren't your receptors stuffed early on so that you are less likely to get results from the weaker compounds?
Also, I would have thought that you would get continuous gains you would start with the weakest compounds and graduate to the strongest, not the other way around.
I have seen the strong -> weak method advised on here and the WAR suggests the same. Could someone who understands the science behind this enlighten me about why it should be done this way.
Thanks.
Apparently this type of cycle gives continuauous gains.
Obviously by ending with substances such as primobolan, you are more likely to consolidate and keep gains than would be the case if you ended a cycle with anadrol for instance.
My question is this: If you start with the strongest steroids, aren't your receptors stuffed early on so that you are less likely to get results from the weaker compounds?
Also, I would have thought that you would get continuous gains you would start with the weakest compounds and graduate to the strongest, not the other way around.
I have seen the strong -> weak method advised on here and the WAR suggests the same. Could someone who understands the science behind this enlighten me about why it should be done this way.
Thanks.

Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 












