Cycle question-rotating test esters

[IronFist]

I have heard quite a few people talk about rotating the types of test that they use in their cycle. For example, 3 weeks enanthate, 3 weeks cypionate and then 3 weeks of sust. What are your opinions? Some claim that it is more effective than running a single ester the whole cycle. I have never noticed a difference.

 

[Andy13]

That is not true. Propionate before a longer ester is the only valid reason to cycle esters.

 

[The Iron Game]

That is not true. Propionate before a longer ester is the only valid reason to cycle esters.

I wouldnt even advocate this unless you are running the longer acting ester at the same time. Wks 1-4 of prop, 5-9 with enanthate. Should be weeks 2 onwards with enanthate and prop. This way by the time the enanthate has built up you are stopping the prop. Otherwise would be a worrying situation.

 

[Andy13]

I wouldnt even advocate this unless you are running the longer acting ester at the same time. Wks 1-4 of prop, 5-9 with enanthate. Should be weeks 2 onwards with enanthate and prop. This way by the time the enanthate has built up you are stopping the prop. Otherwise would be a worrying situation.

Yeah, that's what I meant... But I think if you wanted to use 1g/week of enanthate, doing 2g (ouch!) on day one and then the next week following with 1g/week would probably be just as effective as using 1g enanthate on week one along with some propionate.

Also, some guys might swap their enanthate for propionate to end a cycle. That way there recovery may be faster. How much? I don't know.

 

[serge]

test is test, the ester just determines the speed at which test is released into your blood, so naturally if you rotate from slower to faster acting esters you will gain more due to the fact that you will be releasing more test into your blood in a shorter period of time