Crazy Theory, But WHY wouldn't it work

[idcbp]

As I begin my cycle which I've posted before starting with dbol (25mg. 6weeks) then bringing in test(wk 4-11), dropping the dbol and finishing with tren(wk 9-12) and test into pct. Just a quick overview b/c we've already discussed that cycle, but I've just been thinking about the following cycle though it seems there must be some reason it shouldn't be done but why couldn't I run the test at a baseline of 250 for the 10 week duration. Then go 2 weeks of 25mg daily dbol followed by 2 week tren 50mg. eod and alternate for the 10 weeks then bring on the pct. I figure the 2 week alterations will avoid estro/progest. problems and I might even be able to get away with higher dosages if I wanted. I know typically you need longer to see your best results, but isn't this b/c you need 4+ weeks of steady androgens, and these fast actors would get into my system quickly thus it would be as if I was getting the continuous androgens for the gains but since they would be varying I might get fewer sides and could even increase my dosage safely. Not saying I'm gonna do this, but I'd be very interested to hear why I shouldn't.

 

[JonPee]

You want consistent levels for the best gains and less side effects. Switching every two weeks would yield less gains and more side effects.

 

[idcbp]

What wouldn't be consistent? Androgen levels would remain elevated with not break due to the fast acting properties of the two compounds. What is the benefit of it being the same compound continuously. Additionally, what if the period of alteration were 3-4 weeks? 12 week cycle.

 

[Apexx]

it's along the same lines as the 3 week blitz cycle, which changes the compound every three weeks throughout the cycle. I don't think it's the best way to do a cycle, but I don't see why it wouldn't work.

 

[idcbp]

it's along the same lines as the 3 week blitz cycle, which changes the compound every three weeks throughout the cycle. I don't think it's the best way to do a cycle, but I don't see why it wouldn't work.

Thats what I was thinking and seeing you post it I agree. I guess I was antsy to get to the tren., but the idea of blitz cycles has always intrigued me. Its just that to try it, I have to risk ruining a cycle and thats a bit steep of a buy in, especially whenthe idea doesn't sound absolutely convincing. I was hoping I'd hear from bros who had done this type of cycle and had success, but if not I'm not going to be the test case. Which begs trhe question, Has anyone out there done a cycle comparable to this?

 

[JonPee]

Of course they would be elevated, but they would be constantly fluctuating. It's the changing that gives a lot of people some of the negative side effects. (ie Most people get acne after their cycle when their levels drop). Plus it takes me about a week and a half just to begin noticing the effects of tren

 

[Slyder190]

Why go through the trouble?