Connection between PO boxes & home

[Dr. JK]

In legal muscle (best book I have read to date) it says that police fail to provide connection between PO boxes & someones house.

If the PO box belongs to the subject and he/she lives in the house or owns it, isn't that a connection itself?

If police can prove that the subject is receiving/storing gear in the PO box, then doesn't everything related to the subject become RPG's for search & seizure?

Can someone please explain this to me? Maybe I am missing something hear.

Thanks in advance

 

[manny78]

At least in Canada, it depends on the search warrant limits. If we're issued an "All dress" then chances are the PO box will be included. But that's in a very basic case, cause most guys wont put the PO box to their name. And I think that's what Rick may have been reffering to in Legal Muscle.

 

[The_Chemist]

bump

 

[Dr. JK]

At least in Canada, it depends on the search warrant limits. If we're issued an "All dress" then chances are the PO box will be included. But that's in a very basic case, cause most guys wont put the PO box to their name. And I think that's what Rick may have been reffering to in Legal Muscle.

So how is the connection established, i.e. simply by owning or renting a place?? Does that mean everything in the subjects name gets searched in a ALL DRESSED?

Also, what takes a all dressed to get approved by the judge? I think that is where the "NEXUS" or connection comes in.

 

[manny78]

By renting a P.O. boxes and showing to the judge that searching it is relevant to the case, the warrant will be issued. Now renting a house to someone else will not automatically make this house a target. Especially if there's no link between the owner and the people who live in.

All dressed are issued for big cases after having set up a pile of evidences. Was the case lately with the Hells ANgels (or what remains from them). The judge was indeed convinced that everything owned by them was relevant, and that searching these establishement would do more good than harm to our society and civil rights. Judges will usually check the ratio benefits/civil rights.

We dont see All dressed warrants everyday. Cause it's not easy to get one and it takes a lot of ressources (officers, support staff....). That's why we reserved them to urgent cases or big time dealers/criminals.

 

[maniak]

druze, mozes li mi ti objasniti ovo na nasem, da mogu da skontam, i ako mi se mozes javiti na [email protected] bio bih ti jaaaaaaako zahvalan!!!!