Class I vs. Class II AAS

[grakt]

<BEGIN NOOB QUESTION>

I'm under the impression that AAS fall into two general categories.

Class I : Gear such as Test, Fina, Primo etc. which affect muscle growth directly through AR mediated activity.

Class II : Orals like D-Bol and Anadrol which affect muscle growth through non AR (often unknown) mediated activity.

I can see the benefit of stacking Class I & Class II's, as they work via different mechanisms. I'm unclear, however, why one would stack Test w/ Primo for instance. It would seem that simply taking more of one or the other would sufficiently fill the AR receptor sites.

<END NOOB QUESTION>

 

[Nutri-Wrestler]

Test works not only in an AR related way. The spillover after all androgen receptors are 'filled' will go to work in a non AR related way. Test is androgenic as well as anabolic, thats why its i such a great steroid to use.

 

[grakt]

So if I were to run Primo w/ Test would the 'spillover' from each promote muscular developement via different non-AR mechanisms?

 

[THeMaCHinE]

In Huck's Words:

Then we have steroids that are potent combination steroids all by themselves(meaning they display influences on growth through both class-I and II activity,and thus are very effective as'stand-alone'anabolic agents as well as forming the 'base' of most steroid stacks)....Two compounds possess this unique characteristic-Trenbelone and Testosterone.Either of these two steroids should form the base of most users stacks,as the cover both A/R and non-A/R mediated mechanisms,and adding to them with either a class-I or II will only potentiate that particular mechanism towards muscular hypertrophy...