FreeballinDC said:GnJ, if I had known that a hairdresser could land an NFL pro, I might have rethought my career choice. (but he was GAY!)
GinNJuice said:
....But, I don't think it would be a good idea for high school or college players. At that age the teamates are too immature to accept alternative lifestyles as well as adults. ...
gymtime said:
Right....nothing at all like the open-minded acceptance they'd get in the pros.![]()
GinNJuice said:
I see your point gymtime, but the fact remains that the Pro players are in the media spotlight.
For example, that Shockly kid that plays tight end for the giants...... he said some shit about gays to Howard Stern, then had to retract it all and apologize publicly because of the media attention.
GinNJuice said:
I see your point gymtime, but the fact remains that the Pro players are in the media spotlight.
For example, that Shockly kid that plays tight end for the giants...... he said some shit about gays to Howard Stern, then had to retract it all and apologize publicly because of the media attention.
HaroldSparrow said:I feel bad for the players that he went up aganst. If he gets cut, and an opposing player gets cut, they can contract aids.
HUCKLEBERRY FINNaplex said:and that's saying alot,lol.
HUCKLEBERRY FINNaplex said:Shit,one could only image the inner hell that guy was going through trying to hide that all those years.It's sad that some gays are so conditioned to fear the reaction of their being,but it's also our fault as a society for instilling that fear.Kudos to him for making a very brave decision,hopefully it will set a precidence for a greater tolerance/acceptance in sports.Great story.
HaroldSparrow said:
No shit, this guy is trying to tell me that illegal immigrants are good on this other thread and im like WTF.
Regardless, what i said is true. ~60% of all AIDS cases are caused by "men having sex with men." The next highest catagory is drug use at only 12%.
runner said:
and where does "opposing players rubbing cuts against each other" fall in those statistics?
spentagn said:
And what if a prominent mod (other than 2thick) came out of the closet? Wouldn't that do wonders for the gay community?
2Thick said:
Why was I excluded?
FreeballinDC said:
You mean you're not out already?
FreeballinDC said:LOL, and what is your definition of curse? On one hand, it is easier to have sex, especially if you are a body boy.
On the other, if don't you feel good about cheap, semi anonymous, wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am liaisons, then being gay isn't for you.
2Thick said:
.... I am stuck with women...
FreeballinDC said:
If that is you in your avatar, then all I can say is "DAMN"!
2Thick said:
LOL... thanks...I think...
runner said:
and where does "opposing players rubbing cuts against each other" fall in those statistics?
runner said:i wish a prominent team athlete would "come out" while still playing. it would do wonders for our image.
that said, mad props to tuaolo. still took courage.
HaroldSparrow said:
All im saying is gay men are more likely to have AIDS, statistics prove it and they dont lie. Thefore if i were an opposing player i wouldnt be able to concentrate on the game at hand if i was going up against the gay guy.
HaroldSparrow said:
All im saying is gay men are more likely to have AIDS, statistics prove it and they dont lie. Thefore if i were an opposing player i wouldnt be able to concentrate on the game at hand if i was going up against the gay guy.
GinNJuice said:Has anyone heard Jeff Garcia speak? He seems to have a bit of a lisp...
.... my favorite team, though
HaroldSparrow said:
All im saying is gay men are more likely to have AIDS, statistics prove it and they dont lie. Thefore if i were an opposing player i wouldnt be able to concentrate on the game at hand if i was going up against the gay guy.
HappyScrappy said:
LOL
I get that this HaroldSparrow fellow is just a username on here that only has a purpose of posting stupid shit.
but for the sake of other jackasses on there that don't grasp the concept, look at the logistics of how AIDS transmission works and then make your own decision:
HIV is a virus, and lives in your body. Does that mean it is like a little mouse, hiding in your stomach? No, it is incredibly small and resides in your bodily fluids, with the highest concetrations in your blood. it doesn't think, it has no concept of what you are doing, if you are a man or woman, gay or straight, or if you are ugly or stupid. all it "knows" is that it needs to reporduce, and it has its way of doing that.
Now - they have shown that levels aren't high enough in saliva to effectively transmit HIV. So that method is out.
They have shown that the HIV dies outside of the body very quickly, so that rules out getting it from rolling around in other people's blood - so your assertion of sports players on the field/court/mat fearing it is a false one.
So basically, if blood to blood transmission is the "best" way to transmit it, and it has to be fast (meaning that if the blood is out in the air for any amount of time, it will die quickly), then the two ways that are known to transmit it so effectively are:
1) IV drug users that share needles. Just like when AAS users do IM and they pull back on the plunger to make sure that there is no blood because you don't want to be in a vein/artery, the IV user does the same to make sure that they are in one (you could argue they also do it to get the drug to premix a little for faster injection). so when you do that, if you have ever done any injection before and had blood come in, you know that the way syringes are designed, they leave a little bit of fluid leftover no matter how hard you try - including the blood if there was any in there. so if you pass that off to your friend after you do it and he/she does the same (draws blood up) and there was HIV blood of your's in there, they are going to mix theirs up in there and increase the likelyhood of injecting your blood, with the HIV, all inside. mainlining - fantastic.
if I had a cut on my face, and you did too, and we were wrestling around - there is very little chance that my blood would mix with your's and then somehow magically get sucked into one of your veins or arteries.
2) the other way that is claimed to be highly efficient is anal sex. the reason being that the vagina was specifically designed to be flexible and have rock hard cocks shoved in there over and over until they explode with a messy load all over their walls. it produces fluid that is to lubricate this system, and it is how we reproduce. anal sex on the other hand, involves an orifice that is "designed" for exit only, but humans have found that if you use it as an entry point, some pleasure can be derived from that as well... and pleasure is what drives us as beings - increasing dopamine levels. But the anal cavity doesn't produce the same lubrication that the vagina does, there is some, but it isn't designed for the heavy thrusts that the vagina is. Also, the anal wall is much more flimsy, thin, and just doesn't take the same kind of abuse that the vagina does. So the skin gets more tiny tears as it gives under the stress. tiny tears open up the many capilaries that are on the surface of that tissue. this happens in vaginas too, but the anal cavity is much tighter and closer to the skin of the penis, which is also getting abraded - so there is a chance of exchanged blood.
Not to mention that in the semen there is the virus as well, so if that gets blown out and left to sit, it can get absorbed. The ass is used to absorb things because there are so many capillaries there (think suppositories) - the vagina is not like that.
Not to mention that it starts out as HIV which can then eventually kick in and become "full blown" AIDS, and it certainly doesn't look around and say "hmmm, this person doesn't seem to be gay, so I suppose I'll just have to chill out instead." AIDS is agnostic as to who it infects. regardless of who they have sex with.
anyway - that is all common sense, but I suppose that might be in short supply for some on here.
TheProject said:
wow that was a long post.
FreeballinDC said:Bravo Scraps!!! An awesome post. Can I ask where you got your info? Or did you stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night?
VballPlayer said:
This is only the second NFL player to come out. I think it is cool and I am sure there are a lot more. Good for him.
curling said:
Well, I guess I am going to go against the grain here. I wish he wouldn't have. Let em keep homosexuality where it belongs in the closet. Think about what is going through all those dudes heads that he tackled. You can hear em now "I knew that dude was grabbing my ass when he tackled me."
FreeballinDC said:
I hope to hell they have more to worry about than who grabbed their ass during a tackle. Jesus, if they worried about that, then no tackles would be made, and what the hell would linemen do then? Talk about a holey line.![]()
curling said:
I don't think they were worried about it. It probably just bugged em that some gay dude copped a feel.
HappyScrappy said:imagine if more came out as gay? do you think we'd see more oral sex in the huddle?
HappyScrappy said:
LOL
I get that this HaroldSparrow fellow is just a username on here that only has a purpose of posting stupid shit.
but for the sake of other jackasses on there that don't grasp the concept, look at the logistics of how AIDS transmission works and then make your own decision:
HIV is a virus, and lives in your body. Does that mean it is like a little mouse, hiding in your stomach? No, it is incredibly small and resides in your bodily fluids, with the highest concetrations in your blood. it doesn't think, it has no concept of what you are doing, if you are a man or woman, gay or straight, or if you are ugly or stupid. all it "knows" is that it needs to reporduce, and it has its way of doing that.
Now - they have shown that levels aren't high enough in saliva to effectively transmit HIV. So that method is out.
They have shown that the HIV dies outside of the body very quickly, so that rules out getting it from rolling around in other people's blood - so your assertion of sports players on the field/court/mat fearing it is a false one.
So basically, if blood to blood transmission is the "best" way to transmit it, and it has to be fast (meaning that if the blood is out in the air for any amount of time, it will die quickly), then the two ways that are known to transmit it so effectively are:
1) IV drug users that share needles. Just like when AAS users do IM and they pull back on the plunger to make sure that there is no blood because you don't want to be in a vein/artery, the IV user does the same to make sure that they are in one (you could argue they also do it to get the drug to premix a little for faster injection). so when you do that, if you have ever done any injection before and had blood come in, you know that the way syringes are designed, they leave a little bit of fluid leftover no matter how hard you try - including the blood if there was any in there. so if you pass that off to your friend after you do it and he/she does the same (draws blood up) and there was HIV blood of your's in there, they are going to mix theirs up in there and increase the likelyhood of injecting your blood, with the HIV, all inside. mainlining - fantastic.
if I had a cut on my face, and you did too, and we were wrestling around - there is very little chance that my blood would mix with your's and then somehow magically get sucked into one of your veins or arteries.
2) the other way that is claimed to be highly efficient is anal sex. the reason being that the vagina was specifically designed to be flexible and have rock hard cocks shoved in there over and over until they explode with a messy load all over their walls. it produces fluid that is to lubricate this system, and it is how we reproduce. anal sex on the other hand, involves an orifice that is "designed" for exit only, but humans have found that if you use it as an entry point, some pleasure can be derived from that as well... and pleasure is what drives us as beings - increasing dopamine levels. But the anal cavity doesn't produce the same lubrication that the vagina does, there is some, but it isn't designed for the heavy thrusts that the vagina is. Also, the anal wall is much more flimsy, thin, and just doesn't take the same kind of abuse that the vagina does. So the skin gets more tiny tears as it gives under the stress. tiny tears open up the many capilaries that are on the surface of that tissue. this happens in vaginas too, but the anal cavity is much tighter and closer to the skin of the penis, which is also getting abraded - so there is a chance of exchanged blood.
Not to mention that in the semen there is the virus as well, so if that gets blown out and left to sit, it can get absorbed. The ass is used to absorb things because there are so many capillaries there (think suppositories) - the vagina is not like that.
Not to mention that it starts out as HIV which can then eventually kick in and become "full blown" AIDS, and it certainly doesn't look around and say "hmmm, this person doesn't seem to be gay, so I suppose I'll just have to chill out instead." AIDS is agnostic as to who it infects. regardless of who they have sex with.
anyway - that is all common sense, but I suppose that might be in short supply for some on here.
HaroldSparrow said:
Evolution is trying to keep them from reproducing.
HappyScrappy said:
.... But the anal cavity......isn't designed for the heavy thrusts that the vagina is. Also, the anal wall is much more flimsy, thin, and just doesn't take the same kind of abuse that the vagina does....
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










