Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Blair's out in a year.

jnevin

New member
How long until they try to get Bush to do the same?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14712210/



LONDON - Prime Minister Tony Blair reluctantly promised Thursday to resign within a year, hoping that revealing a general timeframe for his departure will appease critics who are calling for him to step down.

“I would have preferred to do this in my own way,” Blair said. He refused to set a specific departure date, but said the annual Labour Party conference this month would be his last. The next conference is scheduled for September 2007.

“The precise timetable has to be left to me and has to be done in the proper way,” he said. "I will do that at a future date and I’ll do it in the interests of the country and depending on the circumstances of the time."

Story continues below ↓
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
advertisement

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Blair, who took office in 1997 and once commanded Labour with an unassailable authority, now appears to be at the mercy of demands from its restive lawmakers. It was not immediately clear whether his new exit strategy will be detailed and speedy enough to satisfy them.

Intense pressure
Labour loyalists urging Blair to leave office soon — or at least announce a departure date — have grown more vocal in recent weeks. Their protests have been fueled by widespread anger at his handling of the recent fighting in the Middle East and anxiety over Labour’s slide in the polls.

Eight junior officials quit Wednesday to insist on Blair’s resignation, and news reports said Blair and Treasury chief Gordon Brown, who is considered likely to be the next prime minister, had a shouting argument in Blair’s office about a handover date. The two may have ultimately reached an understanding.


Click for related content
Read the full text of Tony Blair’s announcement



Brown, opening a children’s sports tournament in Glasgow, Scotland, said shortly before the prime minister’s announcement that while he like others had had questions about Blair’s plans, he would support his decisions.

“When I met the prime minister yesterday I said to him ... it is for him to make the decision,” said Brown, looking relaxed and cheerful. “I will support him in the decisions he makes.”

“This cannot and should not be about private arrangements but of what is in the best interests of our party ... and the best interests of our country,” Brown said.

Many within Labour were furious at Blair’s refusal to break ranks with President Bush and call for an early cease-fire in Lebanon last month. It revived bitter memories of Blair’s decision to join the Iraq war despite intense opposition in Britain.

White House: 'A valued ally'
White House spokesman Tony Snow said Blair and Bush still had a lot of work to do together.

“He’s a valued ally,” Snow said. “He is somebody whose counsel the president much values and cooperation the president depends upon. And at this point, we’re not sitting around writing encomia for Tony Blair. We’re instead busy working with him.”

The prime minister led Labour to its third straight election win last year and has long said he would not seek a fourth term. Before Thursday, his most specific comment about quitting was a promise to give his successor time to settle into office before the next elections, expected in 2009.

His close Cabinet allies tried to quiet the clamor in the party with increasingly explicit suggestions this week that next year would be Blair’s last in office.

But eight junior officials quit Wednesday rather than remove their names from a letter demanding that Blair step aside. A total of 15 Labour lawmakers wrote in that while they supported the centrist direction in which Blair had taken the party, he was no longer the right man to lead it.
 
the islamofascists must be dancing in the street after hearing this news. finally, they can get some one to appease and sympathize with them, just like what happened in spain.
 
we are living in a more dangerous world now than those who lived during the cold war.

too bad that aren't enough people who actually realize this.
 
p0ink said:
the islamofascists must be dancing in the street after hearing this news. finally, they can get some one to appease and sympathize with them, just like what happened in spain.

lol at the constant inferences to Hitler when talking about muslims.
 
I just think it's amazing that one of the most powerful men in the world was getting enough shit from the powers that be to just step down. Are you kidding me?
 
p0ink said:
the islamofascists must be dancing in the street after hearing this news. finally, they can get some one to appease and sympathize with them, just like what happened in spain.

You mean there are even bigger political appeasers / sympathisers than B'liar's Labour government in Britain?

:worried:
 
p0ink said:
are their goals and ambitions not parallel to one another?

Are you referring to all muslims or the small sect of fools who are not muslims but claim to act in that religions name?
 
bluepeter said:
lol at the constant inferences to Hitler when talking about muslims.


There wasn't any comment of the sort. I think the way it was worded stated exactly which people he meant to. There's a difference between radical islam and normal muslims. Islamofacist is radical, wouldn't you agree?
 
bluepeter said:
Are you referring to all muslims or the small sect of fools who are not muslims but claim to act in that religions name?

exactly how small of a sect do you think it is?

sure, not all 1 billion + muslims are eager to strap explosives to their children or go light up the local McDonalds with an automatic weapon...but to call it a 'small sect' is absurd.
 
p0ink said:
exactly how small of a sect do you think it is?

sure, not all 1 billion + muslims are eager to strap explosives to their children or go light up the local McDonalds with an automatic weapon...but to call it a 'small sect' is absurd.

To claim that anything but a small sect are 'Islamofascists' is what is absurd.
 
bluepeter said:
To claim that anything but a small sect are 'Islamofascists' is what is absurd.


Considering the fact that Pakistan basically has made a truce with the Taliban and Al Qaeda, I don't think it's as small a sect as you'd like to believe. They may not all bomb or agree with the bombings and other terrorist acts, but I'd think more support it than most think.
 
quiet support is what the majority of muslims give to islamofacists
 
Ludendorf said:
quiet support is what the majority of muslims give to islamofacists

You and I have been through this before. I posted up a URL that linked to hundreds of statements and fatwas from top officials, ayatollahs and imams in every single muslim nation on earth condemning terrorism and Bin Laden specifically. I found it in the previous thread where this was discussed but unfortunately the link is dead. Not that it would matter, you refused to read it then so why would it be any different now.
 
Top Bottom