Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Are we crazy....?!

PimpnAintEasy

New member
I saw an interview with Suzanne Sommers who refused traditional med care for her cancer b/c she did not want to deal with the side effects of her prescribed medication. The med was Tamoxifen (Nolvadex). Hell, Nolvadex may as well be alka seltzer to us, & she's making what could be a life or death decision over using it. If you think about it, this lifestyle makes us do some crazy ass shit. I dont intend to change, but it would be nice to know if I am just crazy, reckless or what to choose bodybuilding & chemical enhancement as a big part of my life. Sometimes I wonder if we are cutting edge or just a small population of crazy, reckless egomaniacs. Any thoughts?
 
Ya nolvadex is awful for oyu. Thats why I don't use it. YOu want to stay healthy? Stick to primo, anavar and winstrol and don't scre around with anti estrogens.
 
Horny said:
Ya nolvadex is awful for oyu. Thats why I don't use it. YOu want to stay healthy? Stick to primo, anavar and winstrol and don't scre around with anti estrogens.

My lord, you are on CRACK:xeye:
 
Horny said:
Ya nolvadex is awful for oyu. Thats why I don't use it. YOu want to stay healthy? Stick to primo, anavar and winstrol and don't scre around with anti estrogens.

I guess you like the look of tits on a man. Primo, anavar and winstrol are all fine options for a woman. But not for a man wanting some size. Where the hell do people come up with this shit??? :confused: :frosty:
 
One of the most powerful things in this world is
PERCEPTION.

Perception is what molds a society.

The media/gov has the ability to change
the perception of almost anything.

They could make a vitamin SEEM like
a KILLER-drug if they wanted to.
And people would eventually blindly follow.

You know what stops this process? EDUCATION

Hence the point of these discussion boards.

Other people can think anything they want, but we know
better.

Godspeed
 
There are many adverse reactions accompanied with Nolvadex. Such as headaches, nausea, cough, edema, fatigue, cataracts, jaundice, abdominal cramps, bone and tumor pains, and endometrial or uterine cancer. Yes all of these reactions occurred 3 to 4 times more frequently in women when taking Nolvadex than placebo. I have yet to find any scientific studies of the affects of Nolvadex on men. But these are probably some factors in Suzanne Somers decision to stick with homeapathic medicines.
 
el jefe said:
There are many adverse reactions accompanied with Nolvadex. Such as headaches, nausea, cough, edema, fatigue, cataracts, jaundice, abdominal cramps, bone and tumor pains, and endometrial or uterine cancer. Yes all of these reactions occurred 3 to 4 times more frequently in women when taking Nolvadex than placebo. I have yet to find any scientific studies of the affects of Nolvadex on men. But these are probably some factors in Suzanne Somers decision to stick with homeapathic medicines.



Oh yeah? Like what?

People like that make me just shake my head.
Morons the lot of them.

Homeopathy is WORTHLESS for
COMPLEX diseases.
It might work for MILD ailments but for serious
ones they won't do beans.


Homeopathy is such a scam its incredible.
It just preys on peoples insecurities regarding
side-effects of certain drugs.
People regard drugs as "unnatural", and hence
go to homeopathy.ARRRGGHHHH!!!!

Just thinking about this makes me angry......

Godspeed
 
Fonz
I definitely think homeopathic medicines are a load of shit. I have always and will continue to use Nolva in my cycles. But to answer pimpns question, these are studies conducted on women over 50 with metastatic breast cancer. They might have influenced somers. The choice to use homeopathic "Goat Nut Oil" to a proven medicine such as "Nolvadex" is definitely stupid.
 
Slopain said:


My lord, you are on CRACK:xeye:


I am not on crack. I have the personal opinion that testosterone isn't a good steroid. THis is from my own experience with it. Some people like it, I don't. I also don;t like antiestrogens, the way they make you feel and what i have read about how they react with the body. On top of it all they don't even work 100 percent of the time to eliminate gyno if enough testosterone is used. I like non aromatizing steroids. I don't like estrogen or fake estrogen either.


HEre is why nolva is bad for you:

Italian National Cancer Institute, G. Pascale Foundation, Naples. [email protected]

The antiestrogen tamoxifen (TAM) is widely used as a drug against breast cancer and is currently being tested as a chemopreventive agent. However, a number of studies showed genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of TAM. These effects are thought to be related to oxygen radical overproduction which occurs during TAM metabolic activation. There is no evidence, thus far, on TAM toxicity to embryos and gametes. The present study was designed to elucidate the mechanisms of TAM-induced developmental, reproductive and cytogenetic toxicity towards sea urchin (SU) embryos with regard to the possibility of TAM-initiated oxidative stress. Embryo cultures from SU were subjected to long-term (throughout embryogenesis) or short-term (two hours) incubation with TAM at concentrations from 10(-8) to 10(-5) M. The experiments on TAM-induced toxicity to gametes were carried out with SU sperm, or unfertilized eggs, suspended in TAM (10(-8) to 10(-6) M). To assess the effects of TAM to embryos or to gametes, developmental defects, embryonic mortality, fertilization success, and cytogenetic abnormalities were scored. Oxidative damage to DNA and lipids was detected by measurements of 8OHdG levels and lipid peroxidation, respectively. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production by eggs and embryos was recorded by luminol-dependent chemiluminescence (LDCL) and cytochrome c reduction methods. The changes in activities of SU superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase were also evaluated. TAM exerted: a) early embryonic mortality to exposed embryos and to the offspring of exposed eggs; b) developmental defects to the offspring of exposed sperm; c) decrease in sperm fertilization success, and d) cytogenetic effects in the offspring of exposed sperm or eggs. These morphological effects corresponded to the state of oxidative stress in SU embryos (increased oxidative damage to DNA and lipids and induction of antioxidant enzymes). Since TAM did increase significantly ROS production by embryos, it is suggested that TAM may be metabolically activated by SU embryonic oxidases and peroxidases, which in turn could be induced by TAM. The present study provides further support to the utilization of the SU system as a useful model to help elucidate mechanisms of chemical teratogenesis and carcinogenesis.

Division of Toxicology, Whitaker College of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139-4307, USA.

Tamoxifen was carcinogenic to the liver of male and female rats, inducing hepatocellular carcinomas when administered daily by gavage or fed continuously in the diet. It also acted as a promoting agent in a two-stage model of carcinogenesis in rat liver. In contrast, tamoxifen acted as a protective agent in abrogating estrogen-induced hepatotoxicity and hepatocarcinogenesis in hamsters. Tamoxifen did not induce malignancies in mice when administered according to dosing protocols that are effective in inducing hepatocellular carcinomas in rat liver. In the rat, tamoxifen is metabolized to alpha-hydroxytamoxifen, which is further activated to a product that binds principally to the exocyclic amino group of deoxyguanosine in DNA. The same adduct pattern is formed in mouse hepatocytes treated with tamoxifen or its alpha-hydroxylated derivative, and in human hepatocytes exposed to the latter metabolite. However, available data indicate that human cells have a substantially lower capacity than rodent cells for activation of tamoxifen. Tamoxifen also induces aneuploidy in rat hepatocytes in vivo. This evidence has led some investigators to characterize tamoxifen as a carcinogen that acts through both genotoxic and nongenotoxic mechanisms, with the implication that women treated with the drug may be consequently subjected to elevated risk of cancer, particularly of the endometrium. Critical examination of the evidence, however, indicates that extrapolation of these experimental data to humans is subject to very substantial uncertainty. Available data clearly indicate major differences between women and rats with respect to the activation of tamoxifen and formation of DNA adducts, and bring into question the validity of direct extrapolation of data generated in the single susceptible species, the rat, to women in assessing potential risks attendant to tamoxifen administration.
 
More bad news about tamoxifen slopain:

Universita degli Studi di Bologna, Dipartimento di Discipline Chirurgiche, Italy.

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen retinopathy is known to be an adverse effect of high-dose tamoxifen treatment. Evidence of ocular toxicity at lower doses is less convincing: the aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of the above-mentioned retinopathy in a population treated with low-dose tamoxifen. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine women treated with low-dose tamoxifen (20 mg/day) were examined. Visual acuity measurement, slit-lamp biomicroscopy and fundus examination were performed. Patients were reexamined after 6-12 months. RESULTS: Refractile retinal opacities, similar to those previously described as tamoxifen retinopathy, were observed in four patients (prevalence 3.1%; mean duration of therapy 806 days). None of them revealed corneal opacities, papillary and/or macular edema, or visual impairment. The ophthalmoscopic aspect did not change after a mean follow-up of 215 days, although one of these patients had interrupted tamoxifen intake. Statistical analysis (Student's t-test) did not reveal any difference between patients with and those without refractile retinal opacities as far as age, treatment duration and ERG values were concerned. An early hyperfluorescence, reminescent of cuticular drusen, was demonstrated by fluorescein angiography in all four cases. CONCLUSIONS: The present study would seem to confirm that low-dose tamoxifen may induce retinal toxicity in a low proportion of patients, but we cannot be certain that the refractile retinal opacities observed are really caused by tamoxifen, as differentiation from age-related macular degeneration with cuticular drusen appears nearly impossible.
 
oh ya, CLomid aint to good for you either.

Optic neuropathy associated with clomiphene citrate therapy.

Lawton AW.

Department of Ophthalmology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans.

A 31-year-old woman developed acute visual loss in her right eye immediately after a 5-day course of CC for primary infertility. Although she gradually recovered vision, she did not return to 20/20 acuity in that eye. As CC may cause vascular sludging, it is hypothesized that increased blood viscosity resulted in sufficiently reduced flow in a posterior ciliary artery to produce an anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Patients experiencing visual symptoms while taking clomiphene should have their eyes examined promptly for evidence of visual changes or optic nerve injury.
 
Fonz said:
One of the most powerful things in this world is
PERCEPTION.

Perception is what molds a society.

The media/gov has the ability to change
the perception of almost anything.

They could make a vitamin SEEM like
a KILLER-drug if they wanted to.
And people would eventually blindly follow.

You know what stops this process? EDUCATION

Hence the point of these discussion boards.

Other people can think anything they want, but we know
better.


Save your pseudo-intellectual poems for your mommy. I bet she thinks your real smart. Good job.

Godspeed



 
I messed up th elast post, this is how it should have read.

Fonz said:
One of the most powerful things in this world is
PERCEPTION.

Perception is what molds a society.

The media/gov has the ability to change
the perception of almost anything.

They could make a vitamin SEEM like
a KILLER-drug if they wanted to.
And people would eventually blindly follow.

You know what stops this process? EDUCATION

Hence the point of these discussion boards.

Other people can think anything they want, but we know
better.

Godspeed





Save your pseudo-intellectual poems for your mommy. I bet she thinks your real smart. Good job.
 
To answer the first question. some people can get carried away with anything: drugs, alcohol, hell I've got friends who can't stop masturbating 3 times per day! lol. In my opinion, if you make yourself informed as possible you can be safe with a.s. use. some get addicted to the results, others without this complex go on with their life. If you ask me there are alot worse things we could be doing to ourselves.
As for you HORNY, CHILL OUT!. What are you blastin Fonz for? He didn't attack you and he made a great point. Get over yourself. We don't care how many studies you pull out of your ass. Either help out or get out!
Love, peace, and chicken grease!:D
 
Horny said:
I messed up th elast post, this is how it should have read.




Save your pseudo-intellectual poems for your mommy. I bet she thinks your real smart. Good job.

"For my mommy"

WOW, I feel insulted now.

Its easy to just cut&paste information on compounds.
But can you actually interpret the data?????
Moreover, do you know how Clomiphene and tamoxifen
work bio-chemically????

From the looks of your answers that's a BIG FAT NO
in your case.
So, do us all a favour and go educate yourself first.

Godspeed
 
Every drug can have negative sides. Asprin is one of the most common with both good and bad effects.
IMO if I'm faced with having tits, then nolva would be worth the risk. I have always used arimidex though.
I don't know if there is even a " totaly safe" drug made.
 
Sometimes I wonder if we are cutting edge or just a small population of crazy, reckless egomaniacs.

I don't know about you guys but hell I've got goals. One thing's for damn sure that I am a little bit in love ole 4rt.

peace:cool:
 
Some of you guys at this board are very naive. YOu think you just inveneted steroids or something? THey have been around for 60 years. The pros and cons of their usage are all pretty well established.
The main reason I said that I don't like antiestrogens is that they make me feel like crap. Also they didn't even work well during my last cycle. When I said you should stay away from antiestrogens and estrogens in general to be healthy I mainly meant psychologicaly healthy. I also know about these bad effets that they have on the eyes, the liver and the estrogen dna receptors. It is simple as that.
 
Suzanne Somers is obviously stupid, brainwashed and ignorant.

For those who think homeopathy works AT ALL, do you know the two main tenets of homeopathy? They are "the law of similars" and "the law of succussion".

The law of succussion basically states that the more a compound is diluted (often to the point at which there is none of the original compound left), the more powerful it is. Homeopaths give a rather garbled explanation for this, involving electromagnetic resonance of the original molecule. This is pure pseudoscience.
 
homeopathy

i am not for homeopathy myself, BUT i take those "prostavit (homeopathy) pills and they are just great. I think some homeopathic stuff can be good to use, but in general it is way overrated. If 10 or 20 different products work fine, doesn't mean the other 200 work fine also.

As for Nolvadex, i only know that when giving to rats some get cancer of it. But is is like all the rest in life, some smoke all day, never get cancer. My father died of lung cancer: he never smoked.

:confused:
 
Top Bottom