Actually, I believe that most people are going to be getting plenty if not too much of arachidonic acid from their diet unless they are going the low fat route. But I don't advocate low fat diets. Except for people who have physical indicators that they tend to process and store lipids more easily than carbohydrates. In the meanwhile, I would lean in favor of inclusion of omega-3's for almost everyone for the express purpose of lowering plasma and tissue arachidonic acid levels and thus indirectly lowering the downstream metabolism of arachidonic acid, which is the inflammatory prostaglandin varieties. I think Udo Erasmus says something about making sure not to tilt the scales in favor of omega-6's over omega-3's or something.
So IMO it's not a matter of being concerned to supplement with arachidonic acid-containing foods, but a matter of getting enough of the right type of omega-3 to counterbalance the arachidonic acid levels in the diet. So I feel if you had to cut back on either one, cut back on the foods that contribute to high levels of arachidonic acid. But at this time, increasing your fish oils or other foods high in omega-3 is the effective point to consider rather than cutting back on egg yolks which contain some of the good stuff as well. But other than that I don't think a few extra eggs are going to affect you negatively as long as your getting omega-3's.
This is only a comparison of the type of fatty acids, but I am hoping this might shed some light on the issue. If you are eating egg yolks for the omega-3 content but worried about the simultaneous risk of a diet not specifically low in other cholesterols, here are a couple of studies that may have indirect correllations:
Hwang, Daniel H., et al. Does vegetable oil attenuate the beneficial effects of fish oil in reducing risk factors for cardiovascular disease? American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 66, July 1997, pp. 89-96
Connor, William E. Do the n-3 fatty acids from fish prevent deaths from cardiovascular disease? American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 66, July 1997, pp. 188-89
"Fish oils (n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids) and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (from vegetable oils) are metabolized in a similar way and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) have been shown to block the conversion of linoleic acid, the major n-6 PUFA in vegetable oils, to arachidonic acid. These interactions and competitive metabolic pathways have raised concerns that the benefits of fish oil consumption may be reduced if the diet is high in n-6 PUFAs from vegetable oils.
Study participants consumed diets containing varying amounts of fish oils and vegetable oils for an eight-week period. The researchers found that fish oil supplementation lowered the blood plasma levels of triglycerides and arachidonic acid independent of the level of n-6 PUFAs in the diet. They conclude that vegetable oil in the diet does not reduce the benefits of fish oil in lowering the risk of death from heart disease. They also conclude that the fish oil intake required to effectively reduce triglyceride levels is less than six grams/day and that higher intakes do not confer added benefits."
However, if you had active prostate cancer, I would probably cut back on supplementing high amounts of unhealthy dietary cholesterols, probably including those high in arachidonic acid. Even though I don't really consider egg yolks to be unhealthy at all (since they represent and contain a consumate food source for the development of an entire living creature) the amounts of arachidonic acid bring that into question...somewhat related IMHO to the controversy right now with taking flaxseed oil concurrently with prostate afflictions. Another matter entirely and I should not digress.