Anavar vs Primo - Mass & Cutting

[geoboy]

all the talk of primo has me curious. I use var to cut since it seems to accelerate fat burning especially in the abs.

both are considered "safe", non-aromatizing and produce keepable gains. and both are expensive. altho in reality, if the claims about primo not killing your HDL levels is true, then it's head and shoulders above var in the safety dept.

How do the results compare (assuming high end of reccommended dose levels) for cutting stacks and for use in a mass stack.

-

 

[bilter]

I use both. Sometimes stacked. But, I do like primo and I DO get good results at dosages that many here woudl consider too low. I'm talkin 300mg PW here. I am not sure on the effects of primo on HDL. My last cycle was primo, var and a little test (just a maint dose). In 2 weeks HDL went from 82 to 26, but I honestly think it was the var. Some time in the future I plan of doing a primo cycle with not var (or winny) and get a pre, during and post cycle lipid profile done. Feel free to beat me to this if you would like though ;-)

 

[steelmass]

Diet is what cuts you, the type of AS.

 

[mikevegas]

For me both produce similar gains. The best is the combination of the two. Don't worry about side effects, they are minimal and cholesterol will return to normal after coming off as long as you don't abuse the mg's and stay on for years. If you cannot afford to run both, a similar cycle would be EQ with Primobolan. Anavar is very expensive, if you can't swing it EQ will give pretty much the same result.

 

[Mr.X]

all the talk of primo has me curious. I use var to cut since it seems to accelerate fat burning especially in the abs.

both are considered "safe", non-aromatizing and produce keepable gains. and both are expensive. altho in reality, if the claims about primo not killing your HDL levels is true, then it's head and shoulders above var in the safety dept.

How do the results compare (assuming high end of reccommended dose levels) for cutting stacks and for use in a mass stack.

-

If you had to pick one, Primo would be the way to go.

 

[ryan04]

Both a waste of money IMO. The two most expensive AAS out there, yet also the weakest. WTF? At least w/ primo you can justify the cost with it's safety, but var is just as bad for you as dbol.

I'd rather spend half that money on a test and tren cycle and the other half on condoms for when the test kicks in. But thats just me.

 

[geoboy]

Both a waste of money IMO. The two most expensive AAS out there, yet also the weakest. WTF? At least w/ primo you can justify the cost with it's safety, but var is just as bad for you as dbol.

I'd rather spend half that money on a test and tren cycle and the other half on condoms for when the test kicks in. But thats just me.

if I was gonna have a sig quote, that would be it lol.

-

 

[geoboy]

well there are studies re var's preferentially burning visceral and abdominal fat at a greater rate than other steroids. which I guess makes sense since it's a potent anti-catabolic and ab fat is mediated primarily by cortisol.

I can diet all I want, untill I add in some var, I dont see abs. but my hdl gets into the single digits and since I tend to run longer cycles I dont want to be a lean mean corpse thus my interest in primo.

 

[geoboy]

If you had to pick one, Primo would be the way to go.

for why ?