xannax said:How about these 2 as a cutting cycle?
maybe running some lite primo in there as well.
which is better para depot or para accetate?
Whould PROVIRON or NOLVADEX be advised?
xannax said:How about these 2 as a cutting cycle?
maybe running some lite primo in there as well.
which is better para depot or para accetate?
Whould PROVIRON or NOLVADEX be advised?
xannax said:How about these 2 as a cutting cycle?
maybe running some lite primo in there as well.
which is better para depot or para accetate?
Whould PROVIRON or NOLVADEX be advised?
thnx have not thouht about that. how about primo inplace of the parabig_boy_1 said:See little benefit stacking two steroids that mainly work trough androgen-receptor mechanisms. Higher dose parabolan would be better.
Youll have the weaker anavar competing -and displacing- with the stronger parabolan for androgen receptors.
A bit proviron and nolvadex help reduce natural estrogen, for greater hardness.
Retabolil2 said:trenbolone acetate is not parabolan. Leave those brand names alone bro. Parabolan and Anavar no longer being made.
Parabolan and Anavar clones are available on the market but trenbolone acetate has nothing to do with Parabolan(Trenbolone hexahydrobenzylcarbonate). You wouldnt call test prop as testoviron prop, right?
There is no big deifference between al those esthers, they only mean how long this stuff lives in your blood stream.
The primos good but will be expensive if dosed properly and make sure your getting real ones.xannax said:thnx have not thouht about that. how about primo inplace of the para
swolenole said:Var/Primo/proviron.......good test free cutting cycle..but very $$.
xannax said:thnx have not thouht about that. how about primo inplace of the para
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










