Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

A Moral Dilemma

Lestat

MVP
EF VIP
Answer honestly.




This test only has one question, but it's a very important one. By giving
an honest answer, you will discover where you stand morally.

The test features an unlikely, completely fictional situation in which
you will have to make a decision. Remember that your
answer needs to be honest, yet spontaneous.

Please scroll down slowly and give due consideration to each line.

You are in Louisiana, New Orleans to be specific. There is chaos all
around you caused by Hurricane Katrina, with severe flooding. This is a
flood of biblical proportions, but for the moment you are safe, standing
at the top of a sturdy structure that has miraculously survived the
hurricane.

You are a photo journalist working for a major newspaper, and you're
caught in the middle of this epic disaster. The situation is nearly
hopeless. You're trying to shoot career-making photos. There are
houses and people swirling around you, some disappearing under the
water. Nature is unleashing all of its destructive fury.

Suddenly you see a man floundering in the water. He is fighting for his
life, trying not to be taken down with the debris.
You move closer... somehow the man looks familiar. You suddenly realize
who it is:

It's George W. Bush!

At the same time you notice that the raging waters are about to take him
under... forever.

You have two options:

1. You can save the life of George W. Bush; or,

2. You can shoot a dramatic Pulitzer Prize winning photo, documenting
the death of one of the world's most powerful men.

So here's the question, and please give an honest answer:

Would you select high contrast color film, or would you go with the
classic simplicity of black-and-white?
 
HS Lifter said:
Color film.
I was thinking black and white... that way it'd get published more widely since it would seem a little more artsy and a little less graphic.
 
Lestat said:
I was thinking black and white... that way it'd get published more widely since it would seem a little more artsy and a little less graphic.

It's easier to photshop a color pic to black and white, then vise versa.

Color film and chop to black and white for artsy appearance.
 
Black and White film shows much more detail. Instead of focusing on color, you focus on the detail and lines of the photo.
 
i'd grab the president then send him into a room of rabbid mice. Slowly, the mice would eat away at his feet causing him to eventually collapse and then be brutally tortured as the mice feasted away at the rest of his body.
 
I'd grab him, put him in the loft of the structure I was standing on.

after a couple days I'd come back. By this time the body would be saturated into a mass of gelatinized forensick liquidity. I'd cast a grin as acid from his stomach is disgorged with a splat. Liquid offal would gargle in his throat as I'd probe with my embalming tubes occluded with clumps of rotting fat.

then I'd probably use black and white film, that gives a cooler rancid juices sloshing effect.
 
Top Bottom