Recent content by JSHORT2010

Your right that it isn't necessarily as dangerous as some people believe. In medical treatment, it replaced Anadrol for anemia because Anadrol had worse side effects. Like most of everyone else here on this form, I have no experience with Epo either. I can quote wiki or abstracts on this...

I would train by incorporating runs that are exactly 2 miles. Time yourself on them, and do it at least a couple times a week. If 240 is your normal weight, then your current diet should work very well. On the other hand, if you had already recently been losing weight, your metabolism will have...

As you seem to be able to afford EPO, have you considered purchasing an Altitude tent? How about stimulants in general such as Modafinil? PS: 13:30 for 2 miles is no where near elite/professional standards. Even with Epo (which may give about a 3-4% boost in elite athletes), you won't be able...

Re: Everyone Please Help Me Welcome Our New Sponsor, And Post In Here For *Karma* Hit Just in case it hasn't been said enough; WELCOME, WELCOME, WELCOME.

Yeah the new one appears to have no sides, which is its biggest asset I think. So far S-4 is the only SARM available anywhere (I think). The new one will probably be around eventually though as its no longer being developed by GTX.

Sorry to hear that. Was it the only drug you were taking at the time?

I've read a couple rat study abstracts... I've found testimonials on forums to be thoroughly inconsistent though. You said there are sides effects. How do you know? What are they? igf-lr3 hasn't been around very long, perhaps the answers to these questions aren't known yet.

I'd imagine the reason was due to the fact that they know it can't compete with the other SARMs which are currently being developed. 1.4 kg isn't that large an increase in muscle mass after all.

In other words, your saying they will do nothing on they're own?

I work out, but they are endurance type workouts such as distance running. I'm sure most individuals (especially the lazy ones) would love something like this if they knew it actually increased their strength without sides, and without them having to do anything. If I used it personally, it...

They maybe rejects, but if Ostarine can increase muscle mass by 1.4 kg and improve muscle performance without side effects, I suspect most would buy it (most individuals buy creatine which gives about the same effects). On the other hand, I haven't seen this chem sold anywhere (even as a...

Hmmmm.... Most steroids appear too risky given that I'm not into weight lifting. I've read that with IGF-1 (I don't care for other HGH), you only need to cycle it due to receptor down regulation which I hear can occur after 6 weeks or so. I haven't heard much in terms of negative health...

Are there any serious side effects associated with this stuff ? Are peptides safer than steroids in general?

Ostarine has been discontinued as well. It did look somewhat decent, being able to increase LM by 1.4 kg in three months with increased muscle functionality in one large study (with no side effects). S-4 wouldn't be discontinued for its abuse potential since compared to the other SARMS it has...

I'm guessing it has to do with availability, just as thatbloke suggested. After all, the other SARMS aren't available for sale anywhere. Why though is it now being discontinued for development while other SARMS are being pursued? If side effects are ok, then it should still have some value.