Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

MACRO/ULTER........Testing a new Aromatese Inhibitor Formula:

swordfish151

New member
Ok so i was one of the lucky few to be selected in the test phase of this new product...got the email today and replied...but what more can you tell us about this new product? was reading over the old (original thread) but now its locked....email said that you would place 2 drops in the inner part of the forearm in the am/pm? how does that work? thought it would have been injested? Also in the original thread it stated it was for PCT...so this is not to be used like a-dex during a cycle, but in conjuction with your PCT protocol correct....tell us how or why you came up with the product...thanks guys...
 
macrophage69alpha said:
actually local aromatase production is often a big factor in gynecomastia. Though this particular formula is not intended for gyno specific reduction (though there is something in the "works" along those lines)

Why topical? why the forearm?
 
interesting...so i am correct that this will be used for PCT not during a cycle like we would a-dex correct? also how long should this be runned during pct? i know the email said that it will come with instructions...but im impatient lol
 
swordfish151 said:
interesting...so i am correct that this will be used for PCT not during a cycle like we would a-dex correct? also how long should this be runned during pct? i know the email said that it will come with instructions...but im impatient lol
No it is used DURING YOUR CYCLE AND FOR PCT. I am using it now and I am dry as hell. I was using arimidex and it's waaaay better at lower E and raising my immune system. Got over a cold in a day and that's very unusual for me.
 
Ulter said:
No it is used DURING YOUR CYCLE AND FOR PCT. I am using it now and I am dry as hell. I was using arimidex and it's waaaay better at lower E and raising my immune system. Got over a cold in a day and that's very unusual for me.

ULTER...U got me all sorts of fired up. When I get this I should drop the a-dex and run this instead?

I am running 600mg test E/wk 40mg t-bol ed and .5mg eod a-dex (completely dry)...how much should I run?

Thanks...Cant wait to try another great product from you guys!!!

Axe
 
DBBT said:
Hey, The DBBT wants to know if he starts getting tities even with this AI should he hold back on taking nolva just for the experiment? Also how does this AI, if at all, effect lipids?

GREAT QUESTION!! bump!
 
Ok, so i got mine on saturday, started my sust/dbol cycle today and started this new product as well...its says on the label to do 1-2 pumps 2X a day...now should this be cycled like a-dex? ED? EOD? Also i wasnt expecting it to be kinda runny..lol...so when i put one pump on my inner forearm it kind of ran a little..so i just smoothed it in with my fingers...is it ok to just smooth it out or should i rubb it in??
 
Ulter said:
You have to get used to that sprayer. I did.
One pump on each arm is what I do twice a day.

Yeah i think your right...im going to be doing 2 pumps (one pump on each forearm) 2 times a day...but should this be done Everyday? Every other day? Is that enough for a 12 week cycle and PCT IF your doing it everyday??
 
Ulter said:
Yes it's formulated for daily use. There is plenty for a 12 week cycle.
Here's the trick with the pump on the formula. My first few were sketchy and it did run down my forearm...anyway today i did two pumps at point blank range and that did the trick, it still runs a little but at least all of the formula gets on your skin and not on the counter when I first sprayed it a foot away from my forearm :p
 
Got mine a few days ago, I won't be starting till 3 more weeks, after I finish this trial run of Omega Labs IGF-1 thanks to Indy. I really AM the guinea-pig for anything EF wants to know about, as long as it's free :D
 
DBBT said:
... Also how does this AI, if at all, effect lipids?


I am assuming that AI's affect one's lipid profile in an negative way? Not familiar w/lipid's and AI's so any info is appreciated.
 
TheRide said:
I am assuming that AI's affect one's lipid profile in an negative way? Not familiar w/lipid's and AI's so any info is appreciated.
yea ulter said the product we're testing effects lipid values the same as any other AI would (ie adex), and yes in a negative way. But, again this is something we do and one can take precautions to better ones cholest. levels hdl or ldl by on and off cycle using sesapure (sesamax) polycosonol, and niacin (i still take the niacin dont know about n e 1 else)
 
Nothing herbal is going to come close to anastrozole for reducing estrogen levels.

Sorry to state the obvious, but that needs to be said.

If you're worried about your lipid levels, then don't use an aromatase inhibitor (i.e. Arimidex and Femara).

You can use exemestane instead. or if that is too expensive Novaldex.

Best bet is Novaldex. As it is a weak estrogen, it will help in keeping your lipid levels normal.
 
JS27 said:
Nothing herbal is going to come close to anastrozole for reducing estrogen levels.

Sorry to state the obvious, but that needs to be said.

If you're worried about your lipid levels, then don't use an aromatase inhibitor (i.e. Arimidex and Femara).

You can use exemestane instead. or if that is too expensive Novaldex.

Best bet is Novaldex. As it is a weak estrogen, it will help in keeping your lipid levels normal.

its not herbal. its a naturally occuring steroidal aromatase inhibitor.
 
macrophage69alpha said:
its not herbal. its a naturally occuring steroidal aromatase inhibitor.

Emphasis on "naturally occuring" :)

Lets be completely candid here....it's potency is not even going to come
close to that of Anastrozole.

It's a bit irresponsible to claim that it's effects will be comparable to A-dex.

This whole thing is starting to remind me of the whole "Chrysin" Debacle a few years ago.
 
JS27 said:
Emphasis on "naturally occuring" :)

Lets be completely candid here....it's potency is not even going to come
close to that of Anastrozole.

It's a bit irresponsible to claim that it's effects will be comparable to A-dex.

This whole thing is starting to remind me of the whole "Chrysin" Debacle a few years ago.

actually its more potent
not really
they are not comparable

all of the steroidal based aromatase inhibitors, including exemstane are based on the active which is ATD
 
swordfish151 said:
hmm...no answer...looks like macro wins again LOL

Please realize that most people do not spend all day in front of the computer.

In any case,

ATD = androst-1,4,6-triene-3,17-dione

It's basically a androstenedione analogue. A C-19 Steroid.

Exemestane for example is methyleneandrost-4-ene-3,17-dione. The methylation increases it's oral bio-availibility drastically. Also it's anti-estrogenic activity.

To say that ATD works well in humans is quite a stretch. It's structure
hasn't been sufficiently manipulated to ensure a high enough anti-estrogenic activity.

I would describe it's potency as follows:

ATD is to Arimidex, as DHEA is to testosterone.

If you manipulated the molecular structure some more, you could come up with some far more potent compounds, but then the pharmaceutical companies would have already done so.

The only reason they did not, is that ATD is considered a naturally-occuring compund and is covered under the Hatch Act. (Where all naturally occuring substances cannot be patented. (GHB being the big exception)
 
JS27 said:
Please realize that most people do not spend all day in front of the computer.

In any case,

ATD = androst-1,4,6-triene-3,17-dione

It's basically a androstenedione analogue. A C-19 Steroid.

Exemestane for example is methyleneandrost-4-ene-3,17-dione. The methylation increases it's oral bio-availibility drastically. Also it's anti-estrogenic activity.

To say that ATD works well in humans is quite a stretch. It's structure
hasn't been sufficiently manipulated to ensure a high enough anti-estrogenic activity.

I would describe it's potency as follows:

ATD is to Arimidex, as DHEA is to testosterone.

If you manipulated the molecular structure some more, you could come up with some far more potent compounds, but then the pharmaceutical companies would have already done so.

The only reason they did not, is that ATD is considered a naturally-occuring compund and is covered under the Hatch Act. (Where all naturally occuring substances cannot be patented. (GHB being the big exception)

Im just enjoying the debate my friend..good information
 
JS27 said:
Exemestane for example is methyleneandrost-4-ene-3,17-dione. The methylation increases it's oral bio-availibility drastically. Also it's anti-estrogenic activity.

yes and no.

if you had actually done a search on pubmed you would realize that the potency is similar, oral bioavailability is the issue. Hence why its a topical (aka transdermal) formulation.

just to clarify exemestane is not an anti-estrogen, its an aromatase inhibitor-- a suicidal one- the same as ATD.

in point of fact anti-estrogen is a often used misnomer. example nolvadex and clomid are not anti-estrogens they are SERMs.
 
JS27 said:
If you manipulated the molecular structure some more, you could come up with some far more potent compounds, but then the pharmaceutical companies would have already done so.

The only reason they did not, is that ATD is considered a naturally-occuring compund and is covered under the Hatch Act. (Where all naturally occuring substances cannot be patented.

manipulating the structure is how they came up with exemestane. The reason that ATD was not developed was because it was not patentable. Most, if not all pharmaceutical development is based on patentability and hence profitability. Effectiveness comes a distant second.
 
Yes, how IS this ATD on lipids compared to aromasin? I too stack niacin, polycosanol, and now sesamax( the older version) when taking anything, along with my EFA's. How does this AI affect lipid profile?
 
Tux said:
Yes, how IS this ATD on lipids compared to aromasin? I too stack niacin, polycosanol, and now sesamax( the older version) when taking anything, along with my EFA's. How does this AI affect lipid profile?

mechanstically they are very similar, there is no data on cholesterol. However it is likely the impact is very similar as they are both steroidal AI's (as opposed to dex and femara which are not)
 
One week into using it, 2 pumps am/pm on the inner forearm...no bloat in sight..im consuming alot more cals then before (was dieting before i got on), im on sustanon (500mgs wk for 12 weeks and 30mgs of dbol for 4 weeks) so far im loving it..dry as hell...pounding down around 3000+ cals....oh and i love the smell...citrus(orange) right..lol
 
smell is good, water down, no sides that i can pinpoint other than the desireable ones... did develop a rash in the crook of each elbow, small blisters actuall, but that might have been from some dastardly combo of events, so i am being very careful to avoid application in that spot for no other reason that the tiny remnants of rash are sore... no skin irritation of any kind anywhere along the inner forearm, so i am guessing external elements NOT realated to the product.

will keep ya informed.
 
I luv the smell...wife thinks it smells like bathroom cleaner. I substituted my a-dex for your product. I have been doing 2 squirts 2x per day. I am still dry as all can be. So I have to give it 2 thumbs up.
 
macrophage69alpha said:
more updates?

:)

Macro: This is a great product. Easy to use and effective. I will use it instead of a-dex or l-dex assuming it is cost effective. Assuming 2 squirts at a time 2x per day how many days will this last and how much will it cost?
 
axe3 said:
Macro: This is a great product. Easy to use and effective. I will use it instead of a-dex or l-dex assuming it is cost effective. Assuming 2 squirts at a time 2x per day how many days will this last and how much will it cost?

about 50-60 days (depending on the final matrix and dosing)- less than 40$
 
macrophage69alpha said:
about 50-60 days (depending on the final matrix and dosing)- less than 40$


have my bottle all ready to go just waiting to start the cycle and ill post updates for you and everyone here.....
 
Yep, my bottle is ready to go, and I'll be putting it to the ULTIMATE test lol. Right after New Years, I start my heaviest cycle ever. I've decided to compete this coming summer, and I want to not just place well, I want to decimate everyone. So, the bulker will be 1200mg/week test E 10weeks, 1g/week EQ 10 weeks, 60-80mg/day dbol weeks 1-4, 400mg/week test prop week 1-4. That's when I'll be using the new product. Then I'll switch it over to moderate test, maybe 5-600mg/week, EQ at 6-900/week, long-acting masteron 500/week, and tren enth 4-500/week. Towards the end I'll switch to short-acting masteron and fina, and trade the test E for prop, then drop that 2 weeks out. If that stuff keeps me even semi-dry with that much test/EQ/dbol, it'll be great stuff!
 
macrophage69alpha said:
I'm a couple weeks into it and the only side i've noticed is that it irritates my skin where i'm applying it. I try to spray it in different spots all on the inside of forearm to try to prevent spraying on the same spot each time, skin gets a little dry, sore, red bumps. Am I the only one experiencing this?
 
I would not suggest anyone stop your anti-estrogens and just jump into any herbal formula or any other OTC formula. Stick to your arimidex, aromasin and have nolvadex on hand. I've had enough clients with "crysine" horror stories - 6 full blown gyno cases, all had surgery because of it...think of the poor folks getting gyno from M1T, even when the claims are all over the internet saying it's the best testosterone "like" product with no sides.
 
Mr.X said:
I would not suggest anyone stop your anti-estrogens and just jump into any herbal formula or any other OTC formula. Stick to your arimidex, aromasin and have nolvadex on hand. I've had enough clients with "crysine" horror stories - 6 full blown gyno cases, all had surgery because of it...think of the poor folks getting gyno from M1T, even when the claims are all over the internet saying it's the best testosterone "like" product with no sides.

First I'd like to thank you for showing your concern for the members here. Your post however is misguided. Our new Aromatese Inhibitor is much more effective than Arimidex and possibly stronger than Aromasin. If you think that I would suggest someone use steroids without taking an effective Aromatese Inhibitor, you haven't been paying attention to my posts for the last 5 years.
 
now that just hurtful :bawling: to suggest that AF would encourage people to take something that was less than effective....

the main ingredient is ATD.
1,4,6 androstatriene-3,17-dione a steroidal aromatase inhibitor

aromasin is
6-methylenandrosta-1,4-diene-3,17-dione (better oral bioavailability)

ATD has relatively poor oral bioavailability hence why the need for a "topical".

read the feedback, its VERY effective. why is it not sold as a drug... not patentable- for 2 reasons 1. it was widely studied as an aromatase inhibitor before a treatment value had been assigned to aromatase inhibition and it exists in nature.
 
Ulter said:
First I'd like to thank you for showing your concern for the members here. Your post however is misguided. Our new Aromatese Inhibitor is much more effective than Arimidex and possibly stronger than Aromasin. If you think that I would suggest someone use steroids without taking an effective Aromatese Inhibitor, you haven't been paying attention to my posts for the last 5 years.

Macro and Ulter, I understand this is something you guys are trying to sell, that I can't disagree with - very innovative idea. But an OTC product to replace aromasin or arimidex, I just would never/could never suggest it to members on a sole basis.

Crysine was an anti-e on paper, EVERY single study on it was AMAZING! I mean this was the next huge supplement to hit the market, but, in the end, it only worked in a petri dish and in studies, not in people.

Like I said, I admire the product and think it's an innovative idea, but I would not use it myself, especially in lieu of arimidex or aromasin. In combination with an anti-e like arimidex or aromasin, maybe, just like people use 6-oxo, but by itself the risk is not worth it.
 
Last edited:
tested clinically ATD, clinically tested in numerous animal and cell models, is as effective as exemestane (aromasin) and formestane (lentaron), it like formestane (lentaron is an injectable) is not particularly well suited for oral adminstration.
 
Mr.X said:
Macro and Ulter, I understand this is something you guys are trying to sell, that I can't disagree with - very innovative idea. But an OTC product to replace aromasin or arimidex, I just would never/could never suggest it to members on a sole basis.

Crysine was an anti-e on paper, EVERY single study on it was AMAZING! I mean this was the next huge supplement to hit the market, but, in the end, it only worked in a petri dish and in studies, not in people.

Like I said, I admire the product and think it's an innovative idea, but I would not use it myself, especially in lieu of arimidex or aromasin. In combination with an anti-e like arimidex or aromasin, maybe, just like people use 6-oxo, but by itself the risk is not worth it.

Considering this product is going to put a huge dent in the profits of the sponsors you personally promote on Elite I don't really expect you to be to recommending it. It's obvious that you're unable to argue the validity of the product based on the science of it either since you're comparing it to totally unrelated material. We are having 25 veteran members here test the product during their cycles. So far it's outperforming the AI they would normally use by a wide margin. So it's fine if you want to recommend against it. But you'll do it at the risk of looking as though the member's best interest is not your first concern since your argument against the product may be based soley on your financial interests. The moderators that are actually using the product have all reported great results. All these people testing it will post their results and they have no financial interests in the outcome. So why don't we wait and see what the real live results are before we go popping off about how it's ineffective.

Personally, I have been cycling for 20 years and since I started using it, have never been this dry on 800mg/wk of steroids.
 
Ulter said:
Considering this product is going to put a huge dent in the profits of the sponsors you personally promote on Elite I don't really expect you to be to recommending it. It's obvious that you're unable to argue the validity of the product based on the science of it either since you're comparing it to totally unrelated material. We are having 25 veteran members here test the product during their cycles. So far it's outperforming the AI they would normally use by a wide margin. So it's fine if you want to recommend against it. But you'll do it at the risk of looking as though the member's best interest is not your first concern since your argument against the product may be based soley on your financial interests. The moderators that are actually using the product have all reported great results. All these people testing it will post their results and they have no financial interests in the outcome. So why don't we wait and see what the real live results are before we go popping off about how it's ineffective.

Personally, I have been cycling for 20 years and since I started using it, have never been this dry on 800mg/wk of steroids.

Ulter, I'm not going to argue with you, you can claim whatever you want; I have respect for you but not for the way this product is being promoted/marketed. You have a large financial stake in this, so I wouldn't take this at face value anytime - and I wont argue it either, it's pointless. This is the internet, I could care less about my "reputation," I'm more concerned about the members safety. The members are my #1 concern, everything else is on the bottom of my concern list. Money comes and goes, but safety of the members doesn't.

I would NOT recommend any members use this as a sole replacement Anti-Estrogen on their cycle, for if it fails negative side-effects and consequences are going to come about. Using this in combination with a real anti-estrogen (AI) like Arimidex or Aromasin is something I can accept, but sole use is just too risky. Look what happened with Crysine, I can't stress enough that studies can only prove so much, human experiences vary and until it's proven to me I wouldn't bet my cards on it. Look at it this way, why risk it and take it alone? when you can just add it to your regular anti-estrogen regiment and lower your anti-E doses. Play it smart and safe....
 
this discussion has taken a bit of a turn.
While it is perhaps unfair of ulter to question mr.x's motivations, mr.x's characterization of the product is also quite unfair.

ATD is a PROVEN aromatase inhibitor. A steroidal aromatase inhibitor.

in truth its quite like saying testosterone is not effective, only dianabol. exemestane(aromasin) is really a methylated derivative of ATD making it orally "active".

It is rediculous to compare ATD to chrysin. Chrysin is a flavanoid. ATD is a naturally occuring steroid, but because its not an androgen its not an anabolic steroid (governments definition), thus is legal.

there are a number of steroidal and non steroidal AI's that were not marketed, not because they were not effective, but because either they were not patentable or not suitable for the treatment of WOMENS breast cancer... ie. some had direct androgenic effects, some elevated testosterone too much, etc....

However it is certainly in mr.x's right not to reccomend anything that he does not beleive in. It is however innappropriate to make erroneous comparisons to compounds like chrysin. or to cast doubt, when there is none, as to whether its an effective aromatase inhibitor.
 
I'm afraid i have to agree with Mr. X here until more hard evidence is put up. And not just based on the opinion of one!


RADAR
 
initial feedback from this thread:

swordfish151 said:
One week into using it, 2 pumps am/pm on the inner forearm...no bloat in sight..im consuming alot more cals then before (was dieting before i got on), im on sustanon (500mgs wk for 12 weeks and 30mgs of dbol for 4 weeks) so far im loving it..dry as hell...pounding down around 3000+ cals....oh and i love the smell...citrus(orange) right..lol


ChefWide said:
smell is good, water down, no sides that i can pinpoint other than the desireable ones... did develop a rash in the crook of each elbow, small blisters actuall, but that might have been from some dastardly combo of events, so i am being very careful to avoid application in that spot for no other reason that the tiny remnants of rash are sore... no skin irritation of any kind anywhere along the inner forearm, so i am guessing external elements NOT realated to the product.

will keep ya informed.


axe3 said:
I luv the smell...wife thinks it smells like bathroom cleaner. I substituted my a-dex for your product. I have been doing 2 squirts 2x per day. I am still dry as all can be. So I have to give it 2 thumbs up.


Ulter said:
Personally, I have been cycling for 20 years and since I started using it, have never been this dry on 800mg/wk of steroids.



some studies:

---------------------------------------------------------
Cancer Res. 1982 Aug;42(8 Suppl):3327s-3333s.


A new hypothesis based on suicide substrate inhibitor studies for the mechanism of action of aromatase.

Covey DF, Hood WF.

Recently, it was discovered that 4-hydroxy-4-androstene-3,17-dione, 4-androstene-3,6,17-trione, and 1,4,6-androstatriene-3,17-dione, compounds previously reported to be competitive inhibitors of aromatase, cause a time-dependent loss of aromatase activity in human placental microsomes. We report here that 1,4-androstadiene 3,17-dione (Ki 0.32 microM; kinact 0.91 X 10(-3)/sec) and testolactone (Ki 35 microM; kinact 0.36 X 10(-3)/sec) also cause a similar loss of aromatase activity.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Physiol Behav. 1987;39(1):141-5.


The aromatase inhibitor, 1,4,6-androstatriene-3,17-dione (ATD), blocks testosterone-induced olfactory behaviour in the hamster.

Steel E, Hutchison JB.

The effect of ATD on olfactory investigation in intact and in castrated, testosterone-treated male hamsters was studied using subcutaneous silastic implants. In intact males, there was a dose-dependent action of ATD in reducing sniffing towards novel females and in eliminating the discrimination between females after pre-exposure to vaginal odour. Both sniffing and olfactory discrimination reappeared after removal of ATD implants. Neither the weight nor the general behavioural activity of treated males was affected, indicating a specific behavioural affect. Testosterone (T) maintained olfactory behaviour in castrated males. Untreated castrates and castrates with ATD + T implants showed reduced sniffing and showed no discrimination between females after exposure to female odour. We conclude that conversion of T to oestrogen plays an essential role in the control of male olfactory behaviour.
----------------------------------------------------------

this one is quite amusing...

1: Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1995 Apr 18;85(2):273-9. Related Articles, Links


Increased number of vasopressin neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of 'bisexual' adult male rats following perinatal treatment with the aromatase blocker ATD.

Swaab DF, Slob AK, Houtsmuller EJ, Brand T, Zhou JN.

Netherlands Institute for Brain Research, Graduate School Neurosciences Amsterdam.

In an earlier article an enlarged subpopulation of vasopressin containing neurons was found in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of homosexual men as compared to heterosexuals. The present study investigates the possibility that the number of vasopressin neurons in the SCN and sexual partner preference behavior in male rats are both influenced by sex hormones during brain development. For this purpose, we studied groups of adult male rats that had been treated either prenatally or pre- and postnatally with the aromatase inhibitor ATD (1,4,6-androstatriene-3,17-dione) which blocks the aromatization of testosterone to estradiol. Rats treated with ATD in both pre- and postnatal periods showed 'bisexual' partner preference behavior and appeared to have 59% more vasopressin-expressing neurons in the SCN than the controls. The prenatally treated rats did not differ from the controls. This observation supports the hypothesis that the increased number of vasopressin neurons found earlier in the SCN of adult homosexual men might reflect differences that took place in the interaction between sex hormones and the brain early in development


---------------------------------------------------------



because the most "interesting" area in animals is sexual differentiation, much of the research is done using silastic capsules which release ATD directly into the brain (great for studying very specific effects of aromatase deprivation on the brain.... but not of too much value in this discussion other than to establish that it is a potent aromatase inhibitor). however feel free to do a search on pubmed for ATD or 1,4,6-androstatriene-3,17-dione. there are nearly 100 studies.




as a note- letro, aromasin and dex are all effective AI's each with their owns quirks and individual variances in response. The purpose of this was to introduce another option, an option that was one not solely limited to Aromatase inhibition and that was OTC.

though by all means wait for additional feedback, you can be sure that it will be similar to that above.
 
RADAR said:
I'm afraid i have to agree with Mr. X here until more hard evidence is put up. And not just based on the opinion of one!

RADAR

Let me make something clear here. We aren't even selling this product yet. No one is asking anyone take the word of one person. Like I posted there should close to 20 different people here in addition to the ones already posting on this thread. If it doesn't work for those people you won't see it in our store.
If you go back 5 years you'll see that Aromatese Inhibitors were recommended on this board by E2, myself and Ranger before anyone here knew what they were. We recommended them not based on what others posted since no one had posted about them. But rather we recommended them based on the medical literature. That literature was on women using AI's as a cancer treatmen not on body builders using steroids. But that didn't mean we couldn't see the advantage to us using them.
This AI is the same deal. We are recommending it based on the medical literature. But we're taking an extra step by putting it in the field and letting people report on it.
 
DBBT said:
I'm a couple weeks into it and the only side i've noticed is that it irritates my skin where i'm applying it. I try to spray it in different spots all on the inside of forearm to try to prevent spraying on the same spot each time, skin gets a little dry, sore, red bumps. Am I the only one experiencing this?

I think you are bro..im on week 3 of the product, 2X daily and havent experienced any side affects at all...nore skin irritations...stuff is kickin ass right now..
 
swordfish151 said:
I think you are bro..im on week 3 of the product, 2X daily and havent experienced any side affects at all...nore skin irritations...stuff is kickin ass right now..

Can't wait to give this stuff a go. 2 more weeks and its game time :)
 
Ulter said:
First I'd like to thank you for showing your concern for the members here. Your post however is misguided. Our new Aromatese Inhibitor is much more effective than Arimidex and possibly stronger than Aromasin. If you think that I would suggest someone use steroids without taking an effective Aromatese Inhibitor, you haven't been paying attention to my posts for the last 5 years.


"Our new Aromatese Inhibitor is much more effective than Arimidex and possibly stronger than Aromasin."

Now that's COMEDY.

Talk about a totally irresponsible thing to say.

You do realize that if somebody ends up with gyno due to this latter post, the blame is going to be laid right up to your doorstep.

And they wouldn't be wrong in doing so.
 
J***, (stars are for your benefit)

longtime. why the hostility? before you jump on the slam wagon you could think it through.

Part of the reason for running trials is to see how the gen pop responds, it has been tested in house it was more potent that anticipated, still external verification is always a plus.

Its an effective AI and since you mentioned it there will, eventually, be a final version specifically that targets gyncomastia, one that includes 4th generation oestrogen suppression (non aromatase based).
 
JS27 said:
"Our new Aromatese Inhibitor is much more effective than Arimidex and possibly stronger than Aromasin."

Now that's COMEDY.

Talk about a totally irresponsible thing to say.

You do realize that if somebody ends up with gyno due to this latter post, the blame is going to be laid right up to your doorstep.

And they wouldn't be wrong in doing so.

What's funny to me is a guy with 10 posts who doesn't know jack about this subject popping off without presenting a single word of evidence to back up his statements. You read absolutely none of the medical literature on this AI, you ignored the posts of the people using it, and have declared yourself the expert on it. My guess is that you don't understand a single word of what was posted.
 
swordfish151 said:
Updates from the other bro's using the product...?

I have got zero invested in this product...I get no benefit from saying how it works. I have been a member of this board since 2001. Axe, axe2, and axe3. I have been using AAS for a long time. I have represented our country in 2 different sports (USADA and WADA) tested. I have been around the block more than once.

I volunteered to try this product because of AF's great reputation. I have seen nothing but responsible actions and great products from these guys over the past several years.

I have wrapped up my cycle using this product for the last several weeks of it Test (600mg/wk), tren, t-bol. I can say that this products works very well. I am as dry as I have ever been. I will use this product for my next cycle instead of a-dex.
 
macrophage69alpha said:
J***, (stars are for your benefit)

longtime. why the hostility? before you jump on the slam wagon you could think it through.

Part of the reason for running trials is to see how the gen pop responds, it has been tested in house it was more potent that anticipated, still external verification is always a plus.

Its an effective AI and since you mentioned it there will, eventually, be a final version specifically that targets gyncomastia, one that includes 4th generation oestrogen suppression (non aromatase based).


Never had one problem with any of your products. (Save T-Rex for some reason).

But do you realize how this whole thread sounds?

Let's be completely candid here...there is no way this "New, un-tested, and un-tried" (Emphasis on un-tested) supplement is better than anastrozole.

On paper...sure, it looks great. But as Mr. X specified so did Chrysin.

I don't think anybody would ever recommend it NOW, for use as an aromatase inhibitor instead of anastrozole.

Come back in about 6-12 months after a lot of people have used it, and then you might be able to make that claim.

Why am I opposed to this? Because if the person uses ADT instead of Arimidex and develops Gyno.....that would be my fault for having recommended it.
 
Ulter said:
What's funny to me is a guy with 10 posts who doesn't know jack about this subject popping off without presenting a single word of evidence to back up his statements. You read absolutely none of the medical literature on this AI, you ignored the posts of the people using it, and have declared yourself the expert on it. My guess is that you don't understand a single word of what was posted.

It's not exactly rocket science. But since you insist, I'll happily oblige.

ADT has extremely poor bio-availibility(orally). (Methylating the compound makes it orally available). (i.e. Patented compounds)

Yoir claim is this:

That ADT can be absorbed transdermally via the skin at a rate that is high enough to warrant a good enough anti-aromatase effect.

Well great. On paper it looks good. Now you're going to have to prove that this works in the real world.

Until then all claims are going to be quite moot.
 
I am not really concerned with how it sounds to you. You will try the product or you won't and so will anyone else. That's about as far as your opinion goes.
You don't seem to understand that this product is made with a proven Aromatese Inhibitor. By the end of January over 50 men will have used it on three different boards. That's on top of a couple dozen studies there were already done on it.
I seriously don't need you to tell me when to come back or when I might be able to make a claim. I am not making the claim. The claim was made in the research that was done on this material years ago.

Would you recommend Aromasin? You said you would. Do you know how many people here got gyno even though they used Aromasin? AI's do not stop enough Estrogen in men to gaurantee someone won't get gyno symptoms. Did you know that? View just posted this morning that he's on 50mg/day. That's twice the normal dose of Aromasin and he get's gyno symptoms. So if you told him to use Aromasin would be responsible for his gyno? No.

read:
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=5628698&postcount=6

You're simply way out of line here because you don't know what you're talking about.
 
Ulter said:
I am not really concerned with how it sounds to you. You will try the product or you won't and so will anyone else. That's about as far as your opinion goes.
You don't seem to understand that this product is made with a proven Aromatese Inhibitor. By the end of January over 50 men will have used it on three different boards. That's on top of a couple dozen studies there were already done on it.
I seriously don't need you to tell me when to come back or when I might be able to make a claim. I am not making the claim. The claim was made in the research that was done on this material years ago.

Would you recommend Aromasin? You said you would. Do you know how many people here got gyno even though they used Aromasin? AI's do not stop enough Estrogen in men to gaurantee someone won't get gyno symptoms. Did you know that? View just posted this morning that he's on 50mg/day. That's twice the normal dose of Aromasin and he get's gyno symptoms. So if you told him to use Aromasin would be responsible for his gyno? No.
You're simply way out of line here because you don't know what you're talking about.

You're out of your element.

But it is christmas after all, so i won't delve too much into it.

In any case, one person not responding to aromasin falls into the statistical variance for that given drug. No drug works for everybody.

So, if that's your evidence, you better get more. :)
 
JS I understand your point but I must say it is diminished a bit by the fact that you misspelled "ATD" as "ADT" every time you posted.
 
JS27 said:
You're out of your element.

But it is christmas after all, so i won't delve too much into it.

In any case, one person not responding to aromasin falls into the statistical variance for that given drug. No drug works for everybody.

So, if that's your evidence, you better get more. :)
Do a search on this board and you'll find scores of posts just like that one. I've been here 5 years you've been here a few months. Or better yet do one on PubMed. AI's only inhibit an average of 60% of the estrogen production in men.

I am out of my element. That's funny.
 
AristotleBC said:
JS I understand your point but I must say it is diminished a bit by the fact that you misspelled "ATD" as "ADT" every time you posted.

ADT is
1,4,6-androstatriene-17beta-ol-3-one acetate or ANDROSTERONE
perhaps that is why he is confused about efficacy :)


ATD is an effective AI, in fact. IMHO based on both the studies and initial testing its as or more effective than aromasin in MEN (sample size is small, though over the male population response is likely to be similar).

Now since AI's have been developed to treat women its not surprising that many of the earlier and potent steroidal AI's were "passed" over.

basically ATD is an effective AI, how effective compared directly to the three main commercial AI's remains to be seen. Though in males it is likely as effective or more effective than most.
 
Ulter said:
Come on Fonz we're waiting. Show us how out of our league we are.

I was wondering who that was :p:

I owe Mr X an apology: I was guessing to myself it had to be him. LOL

Sorry Mr X for the incorrent assumption.

Ulter: I though you and Fonz got along well? You defended the guy when no one else would (applaudable and reare loyalty these days). Doesn't he still post at your board?

PS: good luck ywith your product. You guys have some great stuff..
 
DBBT said:
I'm a couple weeks into it and the only side i've noticed is that it irritates my skin where i'm applying it. I try to spray it in different spots all on the inside of forearm to try to prevent spraying on the same spot each time, skin gets a little dry, sore, red bumps. Am I the only one experiencing this?
both arms have red rash and bumps where applied, i'm doing the same dosage and protocol as everyone else...maybe rub it in on my asss?
 
DBBT said:
both arms have red rash and bumps where applied, i'm doing the same dosage and protocol as everyone else...maybe rub it in on my asss?

Sensitive skin?? Mid week 3 for me...an no skin irritation at all....
 
top of feet is good (thin skin and vascular)
forehead is good also (though thats better for PM use)
hip (front of upper thigh near hip where skin is thin and vascular)

are you on accutane?
if so rotate sites and be sure to moisturize sites very good on days off.
 
macrophage69alpha said:
top of feet is good (thin skin and vascular)
forehead is good also (though thats better for PM use)
hip (front of upper thigh near hip where skin is thin and vascular)

are you on accutane?
if so rotate sites and be sure to moisturize sites very good on days off.
no, not on accutane. I'll try those different sites and see how those treat me. :)
 
Whacked said:
I was wondering who that was :p:

I owe Mr X an apology: I was guessing to myself it had to be him. LOL

Sorry Mr X for the incorrent assumption.

Ulter: I though you and Fonz got along well? You defended the guy when no one else would (applaudable and reare loyalty these days). Doesn't he still post at your board?

PS: good luck ywith your product. You guys have some great stuff..
Yes I stuck up for him long after everyone else wrote him off. Guess this is his way of saying thank you. :)
 
Top Bottom