Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Research Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsResearch Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic

POST 5X5...what next

Well the defined, hard look will come from low bodyfat, coupled with a decent amount of muscle. Strength and size go hand in hand, for the most part, so it's good you're sticking with a solid program.

Squatting thrice a week will only become a problem if:

A) Your knees start hurting. They shouldn't, but if so, or you get any other joint pain, take a week or two off, use some higher reps to get a deep burn (the burn is important, for once) and then go back at it.

B) You squat 1.5-2.0x bodyweight consistently, even when going ATF, you may (it's individual, depending on stance when squatting) develop imbalances between quads and hams. Even though going ATF and doing deads will work the hams, there's a chance you may want to add in something extra for the hams, but don't worry about that now. This is down the road, and probably won't happen. It's just the only downside I can really pick out, and it's not a very strong point.

C) You get bored of them. Use front squats for Wednesday's workout, in that case. That's a popular change up, and they're a fun exercise.

What kind've weight did you gain? What about strength? Sorry, would just like to know what your progress was like.
 
about

Were those two bold letters really so difficult to type?
 
but at what point does squating 3X a week become counter productive..keep in mind my goal is not necessary for strenght (it is a plus) but for the defined, muscular hard look most bbers posses

I don't know that it does. The squat tends to drive full body gains and as long as you are doing exercises besides the squat it's a no brainer. The main issue is that people are coming from a BBing reference of a bodypart 1x per week and despite the overwhelming popularity this was based on some horrendously wrong assumptions and ignorance about muscles needing a week to recover irregardless of what was done and that it was counter productive to train them before the point of full recovery again. Hell, IMO the whole idea of thinking and arranging training in terms of "working" individual muscles is a fairly bad idea.

Hell, some people squat more often and for a lot more volume over a period. Remember that workload over a period is a function of volume and frequency - frequency distributes volume so whether you do all the work 1x per week (not recommended or a good idea) or over 3 sessions, workload is the same. Look at OL's squatting backsquatting and frontsquatting mutliple times per week while every snatch and clean involves a recovery from the squat position. Arguably that might mean legs being trained 12x per week or some such.

Like I said though, the "5x5" program you used is still a data point. If it worked well for you, then it is only because it is on your 'path' and moved you 'forward' at a faster rate than what you've been doing. This is just good training. Your training will have to evolve and change as you progress, but that doesn't mean that you shouldn't take a good look at that program and understand exactly why it worked (focus on increasing big lifts to drive muscle gains not on 'working a certain muscle', proper use of frequency, management of fatigue, progressive overload, appropriate volume for you at this point in time). In reality the '5x5' here is just a snapshot of what an intro to periodization program might look like. The version a beginner would start with is not structed like that, the version that might be optimal for someone further down the road will be changed too. Lots of alterations in between those 3 points.

As for a suggestion on what else to do, a lot of people have had success running 2 of these back to back. This is due to not having to feel their way, having very relevant maxes, and being able to push a lot harder and more confidently since they aren't worried about blowing the program with bad weight selection. This lets them load a lot harder and get into true overreaching. After that, if you are a BBer, maybe try something along the HST lines. Some higher rep work will really kick off major hypertrophy after building a big strength foundation (this is why training in different rep ranges in different periods is optimal).

Biggest suggestion is to understand why something works and what consitutes good training and programing. That way people don't go back to a 3 day split, training a muscle 1x per week all the time and wonder why it doesn't work very well. When Practical Periodization comes out (early 2006), it will probably be a good book to pickup for you as it should cover all of this in and much much more in detail.

EDIT - okay as I copied the quote in a read the 'muscular hard look that a bber posesses'. This is a combination of muscle and diet. Muscle is taken care of by training, you want the best results for your effort. Diet takes care of that balance of fat to muscle or 'that hard look' in contrast to big and soft.

To further illustrate this look at the pics here of Dave Gulledge dieting down. Read through the thread and see his responses to questions if you like. Inclusing the one from a BBer about how much time he spends doing 'bbing' exercises so he can look like that: http://www.midwestbarbell.com/totalelite/index.php?showtopic=1110
 
That post was awesome. Dave is one big guy. Made great progress, too.

I agree with Madcow on the HST thing. I'd probably run one more 5x5, then switch over to HST. There are two kinds of hypertrophy, at the least. HST will better address these, due to the work in the higher rep ranges. It's a great program, when utilized properly.
 
there seem to be a lot of people who do the style of training we usually can "5 by 5" for a while, then wonder "whats next".

one general comment i would make, is that if this style of training has been successfull for you, why change it? and by style of training, im not talking about one specific program, but the general style of doing whole body exercises, training the whole body or at least most of the body in each workout, and doing multiple sets not taken to failure.

i do, however, understand the mental side... you do the same thing over and over and you want something different. there are lots of ways you can change things without totally changing to a "new" program. switching back and forth between widely differing types of training isnt that good of an idea... small and systematic changes over time in what you are doing however IS a good idea.

for instance... say youve been squatting 3 times a week. how about changing one of the workouts to front squat, hell you could change 2 of the workouts to front squat. i hate leg presses, but if you really wanted to, you could squat on monday, front squat on wednesday, and leg press on friday!!! if youve been doing only rows for back, change one or two of the workouts to chinups... substitute stiff legged deadlifts for deadlifts, change mondays workout to 3 sets of 8 for a month, change fridays squat or bench workout to 5 singles, etc, etc, etc.

ive even seen people who after a while on a 3 day a week program, switched to a 4 day split, doing squats and pressing exercises on monday and thursday, back and pulling exercises on wed and saturday. i dont see this as retreating from the principles of the 5 by 5 at all. you are STILL working your whole body, or very nearly so, every training day. squats work the back, they work everything... and deadlifts or stiff legged deadlifts work the legs, not as much as squats, but they still work them. this is in fact the favored program of mike stone, probably the best ex phys guy on the planet and former head of sports science at the olympic training center.

the main thing is to go about it in a systematic way.

one of my lifters, josh wells, who made the junior world team in 2004 in weightlifting, and can jerk close to 400lbs weighing around 180lbs as a teenager, did this program about a year ago in his "off season" to try to gain some general strength.

monday, squats (5 sets of 3), push presses (3 sets of 5) then glute ham raises or reverse hypers

wednesday, snatch pulls (5 sets of 2), powercleans (5 sets of 2), chinups (5 sets of 10 with extra weight, hanging from a 2" bar)

thursday, front squats (6 sets of 2), push jerks (5 sets of 2), military press (3 sets of 5), then glute ham raises or reverse hypers.

saturday, powersnatches (5 sets of 2), clean pulls (5 sets of 5), barbell rows, (5 sets of 5)

obviously this is geared toward olympic weightlifting, and not really what most of you would be doing. im not sure many here have that much interest in doing so many snatch and clean pulls. and hes using lower reps, because of course for him strength is a bigger deal than size, but even his reps changed over time, sometimes were higher, sometimes lower. this is just as representative of the 5 by 5 training style as the simpler 3 day programs... because we did it systematically, sets across instead of failure, gradually moving the weights up, gradually adding then subtracting volume of training to force the body to adapt


the important thing is to think thru the changes, dont make too many at one time, but make them slowly and steadily.

the real value of the "5 by 5" style of training isnt that it can or will add a certain amount of muscle or strength in an 8 week cycle. the real value is that it is a framework that when used right can work for years, slowly changing and morphing along the way to fit itself to your particular goals, and making for steady progress for 3, 4, or more years. it is more than anything, a mindset. a mindset of writing your workouts down, being systematic, knowing what you are going to do before you go to the gym, having a plan, and knowing that 5lbs a month is 60lbs a year and 180lbs in 3 years.

and more than that it is a mindset of THINKING, thinking about training, and rejecting the latest and greatest thing that forces many, even most, to run from one program to the next, changing things totally every time they get bored or have a bad workout. by recording everything, thinking a lot, planning, making small changes instead of wholesale ones, going back and looking at your workout log and looking at the last month, 6 months, year, etc, and planning the next month... within a year or two you know more about your body and what to do than me or anyone else could ever tell you.

now... last comment. i have, in a big drawer, a record of every single workout i have ever done, from the time i was 15 back in 1975 to my last month of competitive training in 2003. every single one. i also have descriptions and comments, tables in the back of the logs that showed weight gain and strength gain on a yearly basis, monthly, etc. comments on what happened to weight/strength when i changed exercises, changed reps, etc. there is very little i dont know about how my body responded, what worked and what didnt, etc. you all should do the same thing. approach training like a scientist working an experiment.








Anthrax Invasion said:
That post was awesome. Dave is one big guy. Made great progress, too.

I agree with Madcow on the HST thing. I'd probably run one more 5x5, then switch over to HST. There are two kinds of hypertrophy, at the least. HST will better address these, due to the work in the higher rep ranges. It's a great program, when utilized properly.
 
Great posts guys!!! Well i know that the 5x5 has given me great symmetry by no means am i down to the point where i want to be, but in myslelf i feel balance...like everything matches....BUT...not doing arms is messing with my mind? anyone else have a problem with this..i read madcows original 5X5 thread..and one thing that stuck to me was..."DONT FUCK OR MESS WITH THE PROGRAM" so i didnt...followed it to a "T" just the way it was written...so not doing arms...is messing with me...like i want to jump and do a babell curl...BUT the funny thing is that my arms are getting alot of definition AND actually when i flex have grown...it must a BBER mental thing.....but for my gains..i wont post the where i started from cause im a weak fuck but i did go up alot...can anyone explain why i moved up so much in weight and what was i doing wrong that i had such a big jump....
(keep in mind though...this is at the 3X3 phase)
Bench : up 60lbs
Squat : Up 60lbs
rows : dont know...never rowed but im rowing 205 for 3
deads: This is where im the happiest...i never deadlifted...so im not sure but im lifting 245 for 3
military: same here never did standing military's up to 135lbs
Pull-ups : cant do pull ups worth shit so this is the only place where i substitued pull downs...but i didnt move but maybe 20lbs...this has always been a downfall for me...

So as you can see, i have done really well on the program...started with "reasonable" weight and just blasted forth...i was and am very happy with what it did for me...i used it as part of my cutting phase (no drugs) did AM cardio 5X a week (HIIT style) and believe it or not..it did not tax my body as i thought it did...squats kept going up and up and up even when i did cardio in the am...currently im at 195lbs (down from 225) and looking lean adn muscular..still got some way to go with my body fat goal..not sure what my bodyfat is right now..but here is a another question i want to ask...5X5 and Steriods..i have an upcoming cycle of sust/dbols i have been planning..thoughts...
 
Top Bottom