Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up now!

Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

psychedout said:
Question. I tweaked my back on the parallel rows on Monday. I don't think I will be able to deadlift tomorow which sucks.

Anyways to the issue at hand. I find doing the rows explosively really hurts my lower back, and not in a good way. I can do one-arm db rows paralell to the ground with no low back pain though. Or I could go lighter but move the weight less explosively.

What do you suggest madcow2?

I think you might have a technique issue. Doing a movement explosively is not jerking the bar from the floor or anything. It's applying a steady increase in acceleration throughout the movement so that the bar starts slow but continues to move faster and faster.

Look at the pics below. Your lower back should not be compromised even when pulling from the floor. The first move is to arch and it is done under control.

http://www.midwestbarbell.com/totalelite/index.php?showtopic=498&view=findpost&p=9976

Look at cleans and snatches. Very fast but they are all done slow and smooth from the floor and there is never a jerkiness just smooth maximal acceleration of the bar.

If you have all of this covered we are left with a weak lower back in relation to the muscles around which caused injury. Not a good thing which is one of the reasons everyone stresses core work.

Either way, it's a setback. Heating pad for now. Advil for the gym. Take it easy for a bit and see what happens. Don't screw with a back injury. Make sure it's nothing bad first. Sorry to hear this man, I know you were pumped up as hell. Regular rows (still 90 degrees though) will work fine. Accelerating the bar is best. You don't have to put it on the floor each rep. Not as good but if this lets you train around it, it's better than not rowing (if this proves a wash and still puts you in pain, you can use a machine - that's why they are there).
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

|3ossman said:
I have no competitive history in PL, just trying it out for fun. Winning would just be an added bonus. The meet has both tested and nontested classes. Ill make a push to get down to 181, but if I get stuck in 198 ill deal with it. For the junior group (20-23), i have respectible lifts for both 181 and 198, but would obviously fair much better in the 181 class.

What would you recommend i do during the peaking/intensity phase to increase my max singles? PM me with your response if you dont want to post that on here.

Cool, much better situation to be in. My next thought would be don't overly worry about the weight class. Do what you want to do, whatever class you end up in you end up in (but if you are only a few pounds away I doubt I'd resist the urge to make the lower weight).

Anyway, you generally back into your training cycle from a compeition date - we'll just make it simple. So closest to the date would be a lot of time off. Maybe training with high intensity and very low volume just before the meet (singles and no more than 2x per week). You'd also be hitting some singles in the weeks leading up to the date along with doubles and triples before that. Basically you continue the theme of the 3x3 and just continue to raise intensity while lowering volume/frequency so that you show up at the meet used to handling weights close to 100% and fully rested and ready to max the lifts.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Madcow2 said:
Cool, much better situation to be in. My next thought would be don't overly worry about the weight class. Do what you want to do, whatever class you end up in you end up in (but if you are only a few pounds away I doubt I'd resist the urge to make the lower weight).

Anyway, you generally back into your training cycle from a compeition date - we'll just make it simple. So closest to the date would be a lot of time off. Maybe training with high intensity and very low volume just before the meet (singles and no more than 2x per week). You'd also be hitting some singles in the weeks leading up to the date along with doubles and triples before that. Basically you continue the theme of the 3x3 and just continue to raise intensity while lowering volume/frequency so that you show up at the meet used to handling weights close to 100% and fully rested and ready to max the lifts.

Just what i was thinking Madcow, about both the weightclasses and training leading up to the meet. I dont know what kind of experience you have with bench shirts, but how do you recommend i incorporate that into my training? I was thinking if im cutting the volume in the intensity phase even more by hitting doubles and singles, would it be a bad idea to add a few sets of boards (2-5) and heavy negatives (these do wonders for my CNS training) with my shirt. I know im probably pushing it here fucking with your program, and going outside its main objective, as youve already stated its not a PL program. Thanks in advance Madcow!
 
At that point, you wind up with a dedicated PL program and you are better off starting from scratch since you know your body best and which assistance exercises are beneficial to work in (heavy negatives are fucking taxing to the CNS BTW - make no mistake, but with a shirt I can see them getting you accustomed to the shirt and lowering heavy weight). A few pages back there's a post entitled "Beyond the 5x5" or some such where I talk about laying out training plans as a macrocycle (generally a year but that assumes a championship of some kind so 6 months or even less is fine to work with) composed of mesocycles (3-6 weeks) and microcycles (1-2 weeks). Generally a macro = 1 year, meso = 4 weeks, micro = 1 week. So for PL, the 5x5 is best used as a base foundation in the offseason or between comps. For comp preparation there's just better stuff to do to tweak the foundation power and get everything you can out of your lifts. The 5x5 is really just general athletic conditioning for strength and size (originally cleans and high pulls were in place of rows and deads respectively). The only reason I perscribe it to BBers is because it generates some outrageous hypertrophy and most of them are more concerned with building a big muscular foundation than they are with adding a bit of refinement to their physique. Plus, it works accross the board with so many athletes. Basically one of those magic elixir tonics. So it's tremendous for BBers or athletes who aren't competing in a lifting sport but for straight PL or OL, it just isn't setup for that.

Anyway, on bench shirts - you do realize that isn't a real bench right? You might as well stick two midgets in a big loose shirt and have them help push your arms up. <sorry, too funny, I couldn't resist some bench shirt humor - I don't actually subscribe to that view I just like to be non-PC> :)
 
Also - just so everyone remembers, this is not "my" program. I had absolutely nothing to do with the design. It's taken from people far far more qualified than myself. All I did was cut/paste and bring it here. Granted I spend a lot of time explaining the methodology, but that is neither here nor there.
 
Madcow2 said:
Anyway, on bench shirts - you do realize that isn't a real bench right? You might as well stick two midgets in a big loose shirt and have them help push your arms up. <sorry, too funny, I couldn't resist some bench shirt humor - I don't actually subscribe to that view I just like to be non-PC> :)

HAHAAHA...i know what your saying funny guy. But if you want to be competitive you gotta do what you gotta do ya know.

As far as the rest of your reply, i knew youd say that in a way. And your definatly correct. I think im going to run the program the way its designed, pick one day to practice a little with my shirt form, and just wing it at the comp. Like i said just for fun, and the experience, and winning could be an added bonus. After this meet in june ill use this 5x5 for size and strength, then switch over to a better designed PL program. Thanks for the replys and all the help Madcow!
 
Either you have a weak lower back or explosive rows just don't agree with your lower back in which case you shouldn't do them that way.

Have you been regularly training your lower back?
 
psychedout said:
Question. I tweaked my back on the parallel rows on Monday. I don't think I will be able to deadlift tomorow which sucks.

Anyways to the issue at hand. I find doing the rows explosively really hurts my lower back, and not in a good way. I can do one-arm db rows paralell to the ground with no low back pain though. Or I could go lighter but move the weight less explosively.

What do you suggest madcow2?
Madcow has already posted some variations to alleviate the strain on your back but I'd like to add that you have a long time ahead of you and you'll be able to run this program or similar ones many, many times before you're done. Just try and get what you can out of each cycle and see what it brings.

I started on this program knowing that I had a weak lower back, didn't have a clue how to deadlift properly and from week one dropped military press in favour of seated shoulder press on a Smith machine which is a much inferior exercise. I also did my BB rows simply as best I could given the state of my back. This next time around I know my back is better and stronger and I'll put the MP back into the program and try to get closer to ideal on the rows.

I know this doesn't help you immediately and I'm just trying to offer some perspective. Injuries are part of what we do and they always compromise our workouts to some extent. Getting 90% from a program cycle due to an injury instead of 100% is not a disaster since the 100% was merely the ideal we were shooting for and there's always next time. If you're lucky it'll just be a one-week blip and you'll have forgotten about it in a month's time.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

How close to failure to you go on this routine ?
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Anthrax said:
How close to failure to you go on this routine ?
On these last couple of weeks Ive failed on the last rep of some of my "record" lifts-ie-Squatting 365x3, i got 2. I think the way Madcow explained it, at this point in the Routine (Intensity Phase) the important thing is increasing the weight, notsomuch as getting ALL reps, like is so important during Volume Phase. Hope that helps.
Bionic
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Anthrax said:
How close to failure to you go on this routine ?

Failure is not an explicit part of this progrm. You may run into it but it's not a specified variable nor should it be in any program when used the way BBers typically arrange (or disarrange) their training. Weeks 3/4 and 8/9 should be very challenging and may result in failure in some of your lifts. That's fine - keep the weight the same and push on it next week if you have another week. Weeks 1/2/5/6/7 are all below record lifts, weeks 1/5 specifically might be fairly easy for you - that's fine too. You set the weights to scale to records in each phase so unless you misset them or have an off day you typically won't fail. If you do, just carry the weight forward. The stimulus is in the training block (4 weeks) not in a single workout.

BionicBC is correct in regard to the volume phase. You need to keep the schedule and get all the sets and reps. If you fail on the 3rd set of a 5x5, drop back and the next two sets with a bit lighter weight. In the intensity phase, extra days and slashed volume are okay and should be taken as needed (everyone is different and most people will absolutely need it in this phase unless they use the 2x per week which is what everyone should be doing since no one has yet actually cut volume or added days of rest so this tends to reload the athlete even if it's started fairly light - and if it is started fairly heavy it won't provide for adequate deloading and you won't see max gains). The key to the intensity phase is to only worry about pushing the weight up - the schedule and volume don't mean nearly as much here.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Madcow2 said:
I think you might have a technique issue. Doing a movement explosively is not jerking the bar from the floor or anything. It's applying a steady increase in acceleration throughout the movement so that the bar starts slow but continues to move faster and faster.

Look at the pics below. Your lower back should not be compromised even when pulling from the floor. The first move is to arch and it is done under control.

http://www.midwestbarbell.com/totalelite/index.php?showtopic=498&view=findpost&p=9976

Look at cleans and snatches. Very fast but they are all done slow and smooth from the floor and there is never a jerkiness just smooth maximal acceleration of the bar.

If you have all of this covered we are left with a weak lower back in relation to the muscles around which caused injury. Not a good thing which is one of the reasons everyone stresses core work.

Either way, it's a setback. Heating pad for now. Advil for the gym. Take it easy for a bit and see what happens. Don't screw with a back injury. Make sure it's nothing bad first. Sorry to hear this man, I know you were pumped up as hell. Regular rows (still 90 degrees though) will work fine. Accelerating the bar is best. You don't have to put it on the floor each rep. Not as good but if this lets you train around it, it's better than not rowing (if this proves a wash and still puts you in pain, you can use a machine - that's why they are there).

Thanks mc2! I had to skip on the deadlift today, but still did SOHP, weighted chins, and some bb curls. All the lifts I did were solid. Some guy saw me doing the weighted chins and thought I was a mountain climber LoL! I was pretty pumped off that.

I will tinker around with your form method. I think I may have put a bit too much weight on and things weren't smooth enough. I'd rather not have to revert to a machine.
 
It sounds like it's not too bad if you were doing some of the other stuff. It will likely cost you a week. A lot of people who aren't used to doing core work and haven't done a lot of 90 degree rowing tend to have imbalances and a weaker lower back relative to the muscle groups around it. This is not a good thing and can result in injury. Just take it slow with the rows and focus a bit more on form than weight. I'd also throw in hyperextensions (no weight for now, just reps, but you want to bend all the way over and slowly lift back out). This is very theraputic for the back and strengthens it in it's most vulnerable areas.

Obviously it's a setback but it doesn't sound like a huge one. Just warm up adequately and devote some time to rehabing/strengthening that area for now.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

________UPDATE________

Week 8, Workout/Day 3

Squat
135x3
225x3
330x3, 3 sets
-no problem here, previously never done 330 for 3 sets of 3, happy with this-

Bench
135x3
225x3
260x3
---got 1st rep solo, 2nd rep needed help not on lift, but balancing out (left hand higher than right, pain in right elbow...)- failed on 3rd rep [needed a spotter]---

Rows
135x3
225x3
295x3
--new record. felt my body rise up a lil bit from parallell, but majority of emphasis still on lats. Very happy with this---

I did 3 sets of tricep cable pushdowns also:
120x15
170x12
260x10 (stack goes to 200, added a 35lb plate on 1 side and 25 on other side) Believe ot or not great form on these even with 260lbs, it pisses me off that i can do tri extentions for 10 reps with the same weight i can bench only twice. Something is wrong there. I guess i cant complain, all my lifts have gone up a good deal, but i still feel my bench is one of my weakest lifts. I think its partly mental. Im workin on it though.
Bionic
 
I honestly don't know. What I find beneficial is really how the hips shift and the lower back opens at the bottom. The whole exercise is decent but it's this hip/back action that I've really found to be theraputic and beneficial. I have a limited home setup too and this is certainly something I wish I had here along with a few other pieces.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

madcow, whats your opinion, or have you ever used, this machine i keep hearing about in Westside training articles called a "Reverse Hyper." They really "hype" that thing (no pun intended), is it that good? And what purpose mainly does it serve?
Bionic
 
The reverse hyper and the glute-ham raise both kick ass (and yeah, I'm not a proponent of machines but these are exceptional and are less a machine than a body position manipulator to enable better recruitment and utilization). Unfortunately I don't have access to either but when I said just above "along with a few other pieces", those are what I had in mind.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

The Power Shrug

Okay, so I've said before that regular shrugs are a piss waste of time. These are the best version out there and the best trap developer around. No one who has ever done these has ever once gone back to a regular shrug (at least I can't think of anyone and certainly no one that I've trained). Visible results in the mirror are guaranteed in 2-3 weeks. This exercise is very result producing as are all the olympic lift variations when it comes to back/trap development - the back was made for dynamic pulling. You'll need straps and you should start light and build up over a period of a few weeks. Higher rep ranges are fine (8-15) for these and I really think they lower weight for higher reps make these a good bit less taxing on the CNS than working down to 5s and 3s.

A bit on technique - first, the traditional starting position is high on the thighs with the knees flexed slightly and the torso also slightly forward with shoulders over the bar. My descriptions kind of alternate between this version and a variation done from a lower position (hang) just above the knees. Less weight can be used in the lower variation but for athletes not training the traditional olympic lifts and looking to accrue some benefits to explosion and longer range dynamic pulling similar to the clean this is a good variation for training. It's basically a heavy clean pull from the hang. So depending upon what you are looking for give these a shot.

The first quote is from JS182 at Meso - it's actually a cut/paste from an original post:
Source Thread: http://forum.mesomorphosis.com/showthread.php?t=7203&highlight=Power+Shrug

The next 3 quotes are from a discussion at Fortified Iron regarding PSU and their use of HIT. The topic of the powershrug comes in as a way to accrue explosive benefits for athletics without a lot of time spent on technique work first (or as most HIT pundits would put it "the overly dangerous nature of the viscious exercise known as the clean" which is coincidentally statistically less dangerous than the much maligned and deadly sport of soccer).
Source Thread: http://www.fortifiediron.net/invision/index.php?showtopic=7109&st=100

The bottom 2 quotes are from a discussion here that convinced me of the need to put it all in one place:
Source Thread: http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?t=388088

Date: 01/23/02 03:04 PM
Author: AnimalMass
Subject: TOPIC 13: SHRUGS

shrugs/traps best exercise for big traps are power shrugs. take a barbell, hold it in front of you, SLIGHTLY bend knees and bend VERY SLIGHTLY at the hip. now violently extend the whole body and shrug. its basically a cheat shrug. try to hold for a split second at the top... you wont be able to but try. this exercise should be done with heavy weight. personally, ive used 800+ lbs for 10 reps. use as heavy a weight as you possibly can and still get a full shrug at the top. dont load up the bar all the way the first few sessions, or youll likely die. give yourself 3 or 4 sessions to work up to max weight.

Actually the former strength coach for FSU was a fan of the power shrug (heavy high pull from the hang position). I think a lot of the positive non-technique effects of the full and even power versions of the olympic lifts transfer very nicely with this movement. Plus, almost no time goes into teaching it since it is very easy from a technique standpoint (in addition, it works very well as a developer for explosion and power in the second portion of the pull).

As far as there not being any advantage to the the olympic lifts in sports - one can likely make a nice written defense to argue but anyone who has trained them for a period will strongly disagree. I'm of the opinion that the sport improvement stems from the CNS learning to generate maximal power in as short a duration as possible, sort of like torque on a car. Non-ballistic movements teach you to be strong over a period of several seconds rather than 1 second or less (2nd pull is where it's at). Sort of like a dragster vs. a road racer. The ability to generate maximal force as quickly as possible is the difference between a great lineman, running back, or puncher. Rarely is anyone called upon to exert strong force against a consistent object over a period of multiple seconds (even clashing linemen are constantly moving and adjusting) whereas the need for immediate maximal power is prevalent in just about every strength/power sport.

Yeah, elbows locked. When warming up the bar will obviously fly up with the explosion and force the elbows to flex but once sufficient weight is reached that won't be an issue. I generally prefer starting them with the bar just a bit above the knees. Some people like a higher hang but depending upon what you are going for starting from just above the knees allows you to hit just about everything in the second pull phase of the clean - nothing is in stone so one can experiment and augment according to their preferences and goals. I've also found this exercise very condusive and result producing higher rep ranges (8-15 is what I mean by this but low reps work very well too). Keep in mind anything over 5 is high reps for me so when I say something works well in the 8-15 range you can bet myself and others have had surprising results with it (higher rep range allows lighter weight which won't overload your lower back too much and potentially take away recovery from other exercises as a bonus). Obviously reps and lots of weight = straps. I don't know many who try to maintain a hookgrip for this but it is generally unsuccessful and a waste of effort and skin.

Overall effectiveness is very good for both sports, Olifting and even bodybuilding. I don't know of any exercise that can compare for upper back and trap stimulus. Even natural bodybuilders will see significant physique changes in about 4 weeks if they've never done this exercise. For sports, it is in my opinion the easiest as well as being one of the most effective ways to develop explosive power. For OLifting it helps dramatically strengthen the second pull and particularly helps full extension.

<Just another huge wordy post by me but to be honest the powershrug is a fantastic exercise and well worth it>.

As far as starting position, the closer you get to the floor the more like a high pull (or high-shrug) you get and the more taxing it is on recovery. Depending upon your own natural strength curve you may find that you can use much more weight in this exercise than in a clean or standard high pull (JohnSmith182 on Meso has apparently gone well over 700lbs. and may have done 800 - BTW search his posts there sometime, he is very sharp and also posts under just Johnsmith). The issue with increasing the range of motion beyond the top of the knees is that the movement becomes unbelievably taxing and not only hits your recovery but can make serious inroads into overloading your lower back and hams if you don't account for the drastically increased workload.

Given the purpose of the exercise (sports power/speed, upper back/trap development, and targeted assistance for an OLifter), the only reason to go below the knee would likely be to work through the midpoint of the pull and increase your ability to smoothly transition heavy weight from the first to the second pull and then full extension. Some people may get something out of it but I doubt the hit to recovery would be worth it and the longer range would no doubt lower the weight many could use so there may be some goal cannibilization.

When I start above the knees (I take the bar from the rack incidentally), I'm basically in an identical position to the point in the clean after I complete the knee rebend. A lot of people will use a higher position starting from the top, some bend in the knees,and a slight forward tilt to the upper torso. I've done them both, I think for teaching explosion they are both equal. From a weight standpoint you can likely use more from the higher and less bent position. From a general exercise standpoint you are able to recruit a lot more of your pulling muscles from the lower position so it makes for a better all around exercise if one isn't focusing on a lot of pulling from the floor (i.e. most athletes that aren't competing in power or olympic lifting).

So for volume, it's going to depend a lot on the weight you use and what else you do in your workouts. If you are accustomed to a lot of pulling (I see you post in the Olifting forum so I assume that's a given) you can likely be up and running fairly fast. For other lifters who are strong but are not be used to pulling heavy weight dynamically, building them up slowly over 4 weeks would be appropriate (you can use a lot of weight so someone not used to doing this may find a weak link and hurt himself). Once accustomed to the exercise, with lighter weight pulling from the high hang, 4x10 worksets could be done twice a week depending on what else you are doing. If you are pulling fairly heavy weight and working hard you might find 4x10 twice a week too much so a single session may be more appropriate (this assumes you are not specifically focusing on this exercise over the period of time - since you could always make room). This is really hard to say, since every lifter is different with respect to their work capacity, general recovery, current worklevel, and amount of overlap other exercises are causing. I would experiment with the exercise for a period of at least 6 weeks to give yourself a basis on how you think it will impact you. A snatch grip can also be used but taking a bar from the rack can be hard unless you have narrow stands or a narrow grip. It's still worthwhile to potentially lighten the load and pull the first from the floor (if bumpers just drop the last one).

wallcrawler said:
1. When you say rows, do you mean bent over BB rows?

2. Don't you deadlift the bar into the hang position before you shrug it? So you can basically combine these 2 exercises?

1) Yes - this is a key exercise for development

2) Absolutely Not - each rep in the PShrug is performed from either just above the knees or middle of the upper thigh. Range of motion is short and explosive the bar travels from here upward being accelerated as quickly as possible as you straighten your body and pull your traps upward at full extension (arms are always straight). With lighter weights the bar will float upward a bit. With heavy weight the bar will become weightless at the top. Either way the weight will then settle downward and you will return it to the hang position. It makes sense to setup a rack with pins or take the bar from a rack - just don't reset the bar on pins every rep, use them only to set it down and pick it up.

This exercise would be far too taxing to perform the full dead with each rep. That's basically a clean pull and most people clean pull quite a bit less than their best dead while some power shrug with more than their best dead for reps. This exercise is a killer so start smooth and light, get the form and work up over a period of weeks (if you start heavy and have a weak link somewhere, 1) you will likely die if you aren't used to it 2) that weak link may give under weight/momentum and injury you).

view said:
do you have a video of what a proper power shrug should look like? I don't really get the gist of them.

The video I was using to help people had the site go down a while back. Funny, when I searched for technique descriptions I found posts of mine here back from 2001 too.

If anyone has a subscription to Milo - Bill Starr has a bunch of articles that have appeared including the powershrug: http://www.ironmind.com/ironcms/opencms/IronMind/MILO/olympic_weightlifting.html

Anyway, I did locate this video which may help serve a purpose:

1) Go here: http://www.uwlax.edu/strengthcenter/videos/video_index.htm
2) Download "Clean Pull Low" - left column under Power heading
3) Forget everything from the ground to the knees and look at the top. That's the finishing position. Just start the bar from above the knees or the more traditional variation high on thighs with torso only slightly tilted forward.

Be absolutely sure to read that link I provided above as to technique. Granted you need to read forward over a page or so in the discussion to get all the info but it's very complete. A 10 minute time investment - don't waste the effort in the gym without it because this movement is fast and the video simply can't reveal everything that's going on.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for posting these.

I tried to find some more info on powershrugs but your summary pretty much covers it. The links to videos are real helpful too.

I tried these today and looks like I was doing it right (wasn't sure if I should try to hold it up top or not, sounds like I should).

I'd like to incorporate these - my question now is: I just finished wk 3 of the 5 x 5.

Can these powershrugs be incorporated at this time or should I wait for my 2nd run through. If so, what day would be best, Wed when I deadlift? or M/F after BB rows?
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Jim Ouini said:
Thanks for posting these.

I tried to find some more info on powershrugs but your summary pretty much covers it. The links to videos are real helpful too.

I tried these today and looks like I was doing it right (wasn't sure if I should try to hold it up top or not, sounds like I should).

I'd like to incorporate these - my question now is: I just finished wk 3 of the 5 x 5.

Can these powershrugs be incorporated at this time or should I wait for my 2nd run through. If so, what day would be best, Wed when I deadlift? or M/F after BB rows?

I would not try throwing them in on the volume record weeks. The answer really depends upon your tolerances.

The guidelines I give for this program with the pyramiding of certain exercises and squat moving around a bit ensure that if someone is reasonably conditioned and starts conservatively they can handle the loading phase. The 3x per week deloading/intensity/peaking protocol is frequently too much, even if you start conservatively you'll be pushed again at the end. There are two things that cause this -
1) I wrote it out with the idea that people would slash off some volume and take extra days of rest as needed. In general that hasn't happened and mainly because I didn't realize when I wrote it out originally that it would be followed by a lot of people who had never trained like this before and thus didn't know how to guage their own tolerances (kind of expecting people to walk before they crawl).
2) Effort went into the volume phase to make sure it was tolerable to almost anyone - the 2x version is a more appropriate parallel for the 2nd phase.The first post in this thread is a cut/paste from something I scratched down years ago at FI. I never intended it to be comprehensive and didn't take more than a few minutes with it - so no effort went into the second phase write up in the first post.

So anyway - my suggestion would be to complete the program and see how you tolerated the stock volume/intensity phases. At that point consider adding in the powershrugs for next cycle. You might want to spend a few weeks between cycles (assuming you plan to move back to the volume phase for another run through again) working on some weak points and practicing up on these figuring out what kind of weight you can handle.

Then I'd say make a judegement call. If you think you can handle some extra volume throw them in either 1x per week on Wednesday (you could use 5x5 - if the Wed volume gets too high you can rearrange the weekly volume into 4 days) or 2x per week on M/F (don't use 5x5 - just pyramid both days and do 3 sets of 10 from the high position). If you don't believe you can handle more volume but you want to incorporate them anyway, you'll have to substitute and the rows are a logical choice but if you do this you'll want to simulate the clean pull and use the low position (just above the knees) as this is a far better full body exercise than just the abbreviated shrug.

There are a lot of ways you can get this in, maybe 2 working sets twice a week. Essentially, you need to see how much room you have or don't have on the base program given the way you've set the weights this time and then base your decision off of that.
 
Update Madcow on my back.

So yesterday was friday and my back was feeling maybe 70-80% so I figured light backwork would be fine. I did 5x5 incline bench, went fine. I did 5x5 rows with weight reduce by about 50%. Went fine. Then my 2x20 rep squats, went fine. Then 5x5 with weighted dips.

Anyways, I had a bit of discomfort, to be expected but nothing to bad; so I go to pick up the 85 pound db I was dipping and ouch! There goes the back! Tweaked once again. I got a real thorough massage from the gf to help things, but grrr... it's just a bitch. Anyways, other lifts are all going smoothly and I like it quite a bit. Next week is week 4 and I can't wait for week 5 LOL.
 
Yeah - I hear that. I had a day where I did a lot of volume with over 400 on the DL then went to pick up a single 50 pounder and boom. The back is super sensitive to technique. I've seen the load physics plotted out on the spine where the back is rounded and the amound of force transfered to one side becomes exponentially higher. Avoid putting yourself in a bad position at all costs. Have you ever had a back problem before? The way it's going out it sounds as if this isn't the first time.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Madcow2 said:
Yeah - I hear that. I had a day where I did a lot of volume with over 400 on the DL then went to pick up a single 50 pounder and boom. The back is super sensitive to technique. I've seen the load physics plotted out on the spine where the back is rounded and the amound of force transfered to one side becomes exponentially higher. Avoid putting yourself in a bad position at all costs. Have you ever had a back problem before? The way it's going out it sounds as if this isn't the first time.

Nothing major. But working in a warehouse for the last 3 years of my life has taken its toll on my back.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Overhand. Although some prefer underhand due to bicepts involvement or "feel" I have never in my life seen a crew shell, or any boat for that matter, designed to be manned by underhand rowers. Considering they are set up to take optimal advantage of the rower's mechanics this alone says a ton. (caveate - it's not going to kill you to row underhand for parts or even all of the year but logically, if any advantage in rowing power could be gained it would have been implemented in at least some designs or used by some participants). Plus, EMG studies were done on lat activation and the version from the floor, arching the back, and rowing dynamically - using an overhand grip, tested significantly better across a range of athletes than all other alternatives.
 
********************UPDATE***************************
Week 9, Workout 2, 4/4/05

Deadlift-I know the rep scheme i used wasnt 3x3 yesterday, but this was supposed to be a record setting week, so i put it all on the line. Here's what went down:
135x3
225x3
315x1
405x1--New Record!
455x1--Killed my old record!!!! I was VERY happy with this. I almost bailed out, but i made it up, locked it out, held it, BAM! I was thrilled.

Military
BARx3---warmup
135x1---warmup
155x3, 3 sets
The last 2 sets were kinda tough, but I got em no problem.

Pullups
Bodyweight+35lbs x 3, 3 sets
This felt good.
 
Excellent job. Don't underestimate the significance of the DL going up. Pure weight gain can translate to better lifts in the squat and bench fairly easily but for the DL a lot of times it won't help nearly as much and can occasionally hurt. So a big DL increase means you are far stronger than previously.
 
Just wanted to say that I modified my bb-row technique so that I'm pulling from the floor each time. Previously I was keeping my upperbody parallel to the floor, but I didn't have nearly as much bend in my knees/hips (I also wasn't setting the bar down every time). After seeing those pictures I tried it the new way yesterday and I have to say I like it a lot more. I can see myself pulling a lot more weight this way... I'm psyched.
 
Carl Carlson said:
Just wanted to say that I modified my bb-row technique so that I'm pulling from the floor each time. Previously I was keeping my upperbody parallel to the floor, but I didn't have nearly as much bend in my knees/hips (I also wasn't setting the bar down every time). After seeing those pictures I tried it the new way yesterday and I have to say I like it a lot more. I can see myself pulling a lot more weight this way... I'm psyched.

Yeah I've had the same experience. Based on my previous rowing exercises (smith, supported T-bar, standing T-bar) I didn't think I'd be able to row much with this method. But by setting it down and accelerating the bar up I suprised myself with how heavy I can go. In fact I feel like my elbow (ouchie) is more the limitation than my back.

So a big DL increase means you are far stronger than previously

Not sure if this is expected at this stage of the cycle, but last week's (wk 3) DL 5 x 5 felt really awesome, I even bumped up my last set because I felt so strong. I'm really looking forward to trying tomorrow's PR.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Jim Ouini said:
Not sure if this is expected at this stage of the cycle, but last week's (wk 3) DL 5 x 5 felt really awesome, I even bumped up my last set because I felt so strong. I'm really looking forward to trying tomorrow's PR.

It is and it isn't. For someone who isn't accustomed to this type of training or handling very large training loads this is fairly common. That's one of the bigger issues in having to be flexible as one progresses through the weight increases. A lot of guys are getting stronger early in the program so what they thought was their 5x5 or 1x5 max needs to be adjusted upward and the weekly weight progression/ramp along with it. Now eventually, as one becomes very accustomed to this type of program the weights, total volume, and where one starts move up until at elite levels the loads hardly resemble the nice easy start that most guys are using successfully here. A lifter at this level isn't going to find his max move much during the program so in this case, it would be unexpected.
 
i honestly just read this page for the 5th time and I finally think that I understand it all!!!! yeehaww!!!!!!!!

edit: one question though. lets say you finish the program and just interested in maintaining your physique for 3-4 months (those hot summer months), what time of training program do you follow it up with to maintain it?
 
Maintaining would just require less calories. You can use the same routine, for sure. As long as you're getting adequate protein (and calories, on a whole), and stimulating the muscles heavily (to retain mass and strength, continue with, or as close to, the poundages you were using) 1-2x a week. Not a lot of volume is needed, either. Maintaining is fairly easy, especially in comparison to adding mass.

Honestly, I'd keep using the same routine (or something like WSB, maybe) to increase strength if you truly don't want to add any more mass. No reason to waste time in the gym "maintaining". Try to strive forward.

That's my belief, anyways.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Madcow2 said:
It is and it isn't. For someone who isn't accustomed to this type of training or handling very large training loads this is fairly common.

Well I definitely qualify as someone who isn't accustomed to this type of training, or dual factor in general, having performed the typical supercompensation BB program for several years now.

May as well add that I've plateaued at almost exactly your 6' 185# example ;)
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

view said:
i honestly just read this page for the 5th time and I finally think that I understand it all!!!! yeehaww!!!!!!!!

edit: one question though. lets say you finish the program and just interested in maintaining your physique for 3-4 months (those hot summer months), what time of training program do you follow it up with to maintain it?

Tom has it right - calories if you aren't interested in gaining anymore. This program is fairly low for time commitment and works well enough that you can basically go through the motions a bit and still make progress (keep in mind that for many athletes, they are less than enthusiastic about the weightroom putting in shitty effort and this still works for them).
 
Wed. was day two of week 1 for me..I thought my squats would be weaker and I would have to decrease beyond the 15-20 range, but I did not, I actually used closer to 15..255 4x5 and 260 1x5 monday, and today was 205 3x5 215 2x5 and it felt great!! I even was able to go a bit lower and maintain better form than I did on Monday. The DB incline was fairly easy, but my front delts were sore from Monday. First day doing deadlifts and they ROCK!!! ADVICE..do not lock knees, you WILL pull your ham...weigted pullups are always my fav...wednesday's kick ass..we will see how Friday goes, I can bet my legs will be shot to hell..oh well, worth the pain.
 
Also, I cannot do shrugs because it makes my traps too sore for squats..and squats are much more important..I heard cleans make your traps sore also, shoudl I try them out... or forego until this program is over (does anythiing in this prog work traps?)?


Thanks
 
Mithrandir said:
Wed. was day two of week 1 for me..I thought my squats would be weaker and I would have to decrease beyond the 15-20 range, but I did not, I actually used closer to 15..255 4x5 and 260 1x5 monday, and today was 205 3x5 215 2x5 and it felt great!! I even was able to go a bit lower and maintain better form than I did on Monday. The DB incline was fairly easy, but my front delts were sore from Monday. First day doing deadlifts and they ROCK!!! ADVICE..do not lock knees, you WILL pull your ham...weigted pullups are always my fav...wednesday's kick ass..we will see how Friday goes, I can bet my legs will be shot to hell..oh well, worth the pain.
You've got me confused here, Mithrandir. Monday squats is 5x5 which is 25 reps plus warmups, not a 15-20 range. You should be making an effort to get the total prescribed volume in and not trying to set PRs. Wednesdays squats are about speed not straining for 5x5 with a weight which is comfortably less than Monday's and there's no excuse besides injury for Wednesday's squats to be anything other than perfect.

Where did DB incline come from? Did madcow recommend you swap out MP for DB incline? The deadlifts sound all wrong unless you'd swapped deadlift for SLDL.

Take a look on here for dozens, if not hundreds, of deadlifts
http://www.strongarmed.com/

Here, too, for textbook form
http://www.joeskopec.com/assist.html
 
Barbell incline is preferable to a large degree but swapping DBs won't kill you - and now you want to stick with it for the duration so don't change. Forget the shrugs, rows and DL will take care of it and regular shrugs are largely a waste. If you are doing power shrugs (large description in the last 1-2 pages - it is a derrivation of the clean), it will increase your overall volume substantially so you are best to avoid at this point and let the program run its course. I don't know if I understand the sets/reps above correctly. Maybe you are doing the single factor/beginner program on the first page (post #15 I think). Either that or I don't really get it or there is something wrong in your interpretation. I'm traveling over the coming days so I'll likely not be around to post.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Mithrandir said:
First day doing deadlifts and they ROCK!!! ADVICE..do not lock knees, you WILL pull your ham.
Umm, try that in a PL competition and see if they give you credit for the lift. No lock, no lift bro, sorry to break it to ya.
 
Don't you think Bill Starr's 5X5 is too little?

I follow Arnold's routine:
1st set: 15 to failure.
2nd set: Increase weight: 10 to failure
3rd set: Increase weight: 8 to failure.
4th set: Increase weight: 6 to failure
5th (optional): Same weight, try 6 to failure.

I think by definition, a set means to failure, but not in Bill Starr's method.
Am I wrong?
 
A set is just a grouped number of repetitions, maybe even just a single. There's no implication of failure.

With the dual factor system it's generally optimal not to go to failure. The first stage is about overloading the body's ability to recover from fatigue so you run a fairly high volume which taxes the body's, rather than just the muscle's, ability to recover. At the point where the body is about to make you stop working out you ease up on it and give it its recovery period. It'll then generally take about a month before it is fully back to normal during which time you work the intensity phase of the program and keep the volume fairly low.

As to whether it's too little: it wasn't for me. You may be in better shape than I was when I ran it but then you'll probably run higher weights or work faster or add one or two more exercises than I did if that's the case so that it'll be fine for you. Madcow has mentioned that even elite athletes will run Bill Starr's program and make gains.
 
Bionic, I did not mean to do it that way, I was focusing on the lift and on my back, and my knees just stuck..ha, I am not supporting fucking your hams up from lifting it wrong..btw, I slept 11 damn hours today (2.24 PM now)--I think this program makes me tired..my hams are soooo jacked..no bball :(

Mith
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

*********UPDATE*********
Week 9, Day 3, 4/7/05

SQUAT-since this is my last week of this round of 5x5, and a record-setting week at that, I decided to max out on Squat.
135x3
225x3
315x1
405x2=I was going to try just for one, as my previous best was 365x2-3 (last week), but it came up so easy i did two reps!
455x1=I had to try, and Ill be damned if i didnt get it. Fuckin awesome....

BENCH
(PS-i hate bench press.)
135x3
225x1
245x3, 3 sets

ROW
135x3
225x1
265x3, 3 sets

So now that im Finished with my first run of the 5x5, I can definately say that this program works for building massive strength. Im not sure EXACTLY how much all my lifts went up, because Im not too sure of my previous maxes. Somewhere in the area of:
Previous Max---------------Current Max
SQUAT-------about 300-350 455

BENCH----250 (when on), 235 (off) 265

DEADLIFT----around 365 455

455lbs+265lbs+455lbs=1175lbs. Not too bad, IMO. (current bodyweight=190lbs, about 8-9% b/f. To add to these results, for the past 4 weeks or so Ive cut my carbs in half more or less, been doing cardio 3 times a week for 30-45 minutes, and reduced my calories down a good bit to 'cut up' for summer, so the scale reads basically the same as when i started, but I believe I gained a few pounds of muscle, and lost some bodyfat. Im very pleased. Im resting until Monday and Im gonna do it again, with some slight variations.... Thanx Madcow2...
Bionic
 
Last edited:
I have a question.. I think I nerfed my back today...my spine and my neck are wrecked...??? will this pain go away?

I squated first 260 3x5 270 2x5
then benched 155 2x5 160 3x5 (last rep on the last two sets, I had a spot)
then row (this is when it hurt) 2x5 135 3x5 185

I made sure I had good form, and my friend made sure my back was straight, arched and not twisting for any reason. I was about at a 60 degree angle and I pull the weight to my abdomen focusing on the weight and pinching my shoulders back..but my neck hurts so bad I cannot turn my head to see if cars are coming, and my back hurts really badly too. Will I be okay for Monday's wokrout??? please help :(


Thanks
 
I just finished Wk 4 Day 3 (Max + Squat 1 x 5, Bench 5 x 5, BB row 5 x 5).

I failed on some of my lifts, so I had to ratchet down a bit to get my reps in. Not sure if it was the cumulative loading, the max deads on Wed, the fact that I caught a cold on Wed (damn Bally's gym) or maybe I'm just weak.

Squat:
Bar x 10
185 x 5
225 x 5
275 x 5
315 x 5
365 x 3 ANNTF (Ass nowhere near the floor), failed. Maybe too big a jump.
345 x 5 (last weeks max)

I brought my belt just in case but ended up not using it at all. Maybe I should have on my 365 attempt. But trying to go through the whole thing beltless (except for maybe wk 9-10)

Bench
Bar x 10
135 x 5
185 x 2
230 x 2 x 5
230 x 1 x 4 (failed of 5th rep)
225 x 2 x 5 (last weeks' max)

BB row
Bar x 10
135 x 5
185 x 2
235 x 5 x 5. Had to use a little body english last few reps. Otherwise pretty good form, pulling off the floor and back parallel.

This was a tough week, looking forward to Wk5, I feel like I just won a trip to the Bahamas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mcr
question for madcow. i have a friend that hopefully wants to start weight training. I was thinking of putting him on the nonperiodized program but there are 2 issues:

1. hed be just learning the form on squats and dls. is it safe for him to go to a 5rm from the beginning?

2. he is nowhere near flexible enough to do barbell rows properly. what would be good to increase flexibilty, and what could he do meanwhile?

thanks!
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Jim Ouini said:
Squat:
365 x 3 ANNTF (Ass nowhere near the floor), failed. Maybe too big a jump.
LOL, ANNTF...
 
Yeah it was a pretty sorry set. I didn't prepare myself very well for the lift, had a lot of negative thoughts in my head wondering if I should be wearing my belt or not.

It was pretty embarrassing, to the point where if one of Bally's finest tapped me on the shoulder afterward and said to me 'Sir, could I interest you in some personal training sessions', I don't think I'd rightfully been able to dispute it.
 
I hurt my back so bad I had to go to the hospital..they gave me vicadin (hydrocodone) and told me to take ibuprofen (spl?) three times at 800mg, yay. Just when I hit my PR on squat reps :( :(--wish me luck. I hope I can lift my Monday...

Q::if I cannot do row and I miss out on one day, how bad will that hurt my 5x5? (next monday is week 2)--and if I have to leg press instead of squat, how bad will that hurt me??? thank you.

Mith
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Mithrandir said:
I hurt my back so bad I had to go to the hospital..they gave me vicadin (hydrocodone) and told me to take ibuprofen (spl?) three times at 800mg, yay. Just when I hit my PR on squat reps :( :(--wish me luck. I hope I can lift my Monday...

Q::if I cannot do row and I miss out on one day, how bad will that hurt my 5x5? (next monday is week 2)--and if I have to leg press instead of squat, how bad will that hurt me??? thank you.

Mith

The squat is the key to the program. Unfortunately, you have bigger stuff going on than the program - get yourself healed and take it easy.

I've noticed two injuries recently and I think it's important to point out that there is no way in hell someone who hasn't done these lifts or variations (like explosive parallel rows) should be trying them out in week 1 of the dual factor version - particularly the 4 week volume phase (maybe 6-8 weeks starting very light). Full body lifts have ways of finding your weak points and for many people - particularly BBers - it tends to be the core or posterior chain. If some of these exercises are new to you, spend a few weeks getting acclimated, stay light and experiment. This program pushes you too hard for you to be learning and trying new things and then blowing out max records 2 weeks later.

I know that people want to try the program but you need to be safe. A lot of people aren't used to parallel rowing or accelerating weights in their lifts. You need to crawl before you can walk. This stuff is easy to learn but it's going to take a few weeks to get the hang of it and make sure everything is properly conditioned to perform the movement.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

lavi said:
question for madcow. i have a friend that hopefully wants to start weight training. I was thinking of putting him on the nonperiodized program but there are 2 issues:

1. hed be just learning the form on squats and dls. is it safe for him to go to a 5rm from the beginning?

2. he is nowhere near flexible enough to do barbell rows properly. what would be good to increase flexibilty, and what could he do meanwhile?

thanks!

See my above note also regarding this. He needs to just practice the movements for a while. He'll get stronger without even pushing himself.

For flexability, have him try romanian deadlifts with just the bar or a broomstick. Go as low as he can (push hips back, back stays flat, knees slightly bent) and hold the bottom position. He can row as well as he can for now.

Too many injuries from people new to lifts pushing themselves too hard. These are intense programs meant for experienced lifters who are at least competent in the lifts. If someone is learning or has just learned something. They need to spend some time conditioning themselves for the movement before pushing it hard. I guess I should have thrown this in on the first page. I'll have a table of contents added sooner or later. I have almost everything finished and this will certainly be part of it.
 
Thanks madcow, the rows are all that are foreign to me..so I will do as you suggest and try them out for several weeks before I go crazy with 5x5...would give you some karma, but it seems I have given you so much lately I have to "spread it around" first..else you would get most of mine ;)

Mith
 
Mithrandir said:
Thanks madcow, the rows are all that are foreign to me..so I will do as you suggest and try them out for several weeks before I go crazy with 5x5...would give you some karma, but it seems I have given you so much lately I have to "spread it around" first..else you would get most of mine ;)

Mith
I know what you mean: when I started on this I wanted to give madcow K almost every time I read one of his posts.

Sorry to read about your distress but when your body objects to somethng you don't get a choice whether to listen.

When I started on this program I'd not done BB rows in many years and was nowhere near parallel to the ground. I just concentrated on improving form on all my lighter and warmup sets and not losing it too much on the heavier ones. Somone more sensible than I might keep the weight lighter throughout. I'm also trying to concentrate more on explosiveness now which I pretty much ignored on my run through the program.

Good luck with a quick recovery.
 
Mithrandir said:
Thanks madcow, the rows are all that are foreign to me..so I will do as you suggest and try them out for several weeks before I go crazy with 5x5...would give you some karma, but it seems I have given you so much lately I have to "spread it around" first..else you would get most of mine ;)

Mith
I understand. If these rows are performed incorrectly or if you have a weakness and go too heavy too fast (i.e. records in weeks 3/4) you can get hurt because it's such a powerful movement. I've just noticed 2 instances very recently and both people were new to the rows and basically their first session was in the 5x5 or immediately prior and that's not a safe way to proceed with compound lifts where you are handling heavy weight. There was a link a few pages back where I supplied provided a link to pics of people performing the rows. It may or may not help (maybe you've already seen it or maybe it was just a fluke thing this time).
 
I think it was more of a fluke...I have done DB rows for about 9 months and I do 90 for sets of 6...so I cannot imagine why 145 or was it 160..anyway, why this weight would give me so much pain..I should not try to workout tomorrow...I should take it easy for several more days..but I want to get SOMETHING done, so I may go to the gym and use LIGHT weight and see my boundaries...thanks for the help guys, keep it coming...
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

I've been doing the same bloody workout for the past 8 months and I did increase my strength and mass but Im willing to give 5x5 a try.

I need to know if 5x5 is for me...
-I don't do roids
-because of school I get about 6-7 hours of sleep a day

Im satisfied with how my body looks right now, will this program help me add on even more mass?

Thanks
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Santa_Claus said:
I've been doing the same bloody workout for the past 8 months and I did increase my strength and mass but Im willing to give 5x5 a try.

I need to know if 5x5 is for me...
-I don't do roids
-because of school I get about 6-7 hours of sleep a day

Im satisfied with how my body looks right now, will this program help me add on even more mass?

Thanks

yes. it will work for you. the results will still come without juice, thats for sure. if you can get more sleep, thats better, but you work with what you can.
 
yeah, i get about those too, sometimes I get 8 and weekends I try to get ten, but you are a good candidate, most ppl are, whimpy girls (I said whimpy!) and people with either one arm and two legs or one leg and two arms or one leg and one arm or none of either or none of any are just about the only ppl that should not be doing this program.

Mith
 
I just finished Day 2 of Wk 5. This week really is like a holiday.

I'm not sure how many warmups to do since it's supposed to be low volume/high intensity but I'm just working my way up to my maxes in a reasonable fashion, 1 or 2 reps just to get the feel.

DL:
Bar x 10
135 x 5
185 x 2
225 x 1
275 x 1 (sumo)
275 x 1 (reg)
295 x 1 (sumo)
295 x 1 (reg)
325 x 3 x 3 (sumo-reg-sumo)

I've been doing sumo the whole time but wanted to kind of 'test' my conventional stance since that's the way I used to do it. It went very well.

Standing Military (I suck at these)
Bar x 5
95 x 2
115 x 3 x 3.

I just realized I mis-loaded my weights. Should've been 125. No wonder it felt easy.

Dang.

Weighted Pull-Up
35 x 3 x 3

These are OK. My elbow bothers me when I do weighted so I'm only going up to chin level.

All in all I feel pretty strong this week. I am looking forward to ramping up the next few weeks to see if I've gained some strength. I'm pretty sure my deads are coming along.

EDIT: Aw man I just read this:

Deadlifts: The bar is pulled from the floor every rep. No touch and go except on warmups. The bar becomes completely deweighted on the floor before pulling again.

I've been doing touch and go. 2 and 3rd reps felt real easy :(
 
Last edited:
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Table of Contents for this Thread:

<testing it out and hopefully I can eventually get a Mod to edit it into the first post in this thread. If anyone notices errors or something else that should be included, please PM me>


The Program

5x5 Main Thread (Bill Starr/JS182):
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?t=375215

Program Description – Dual Factor (Good idea to read them all):
Madcow: http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4491869&postcount=1
Animalmass: http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4497628&postcount=10
JohnSmith182: http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4497659&postcount=12
Deloading/Intensity Variations 2x and 3x weekly: http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4497645&postcount=11

Dual Factor Theory - Why this Works:
(The further one progresses the more critical it becomes to understand basic training concepts like this. If you aren't familiar with this, it is absolutely essential. This is how top athletes in sport are trained the world over and this includes adding LBM in addition to strength, speed, and power.)
JS182: http://forum.mesomorphosis.com/showpost.php?p=48&postcount=3
Matt Reynolds: http://www.readthecore.com/200501/reynolds-dual-factor-training.htm
Madcow (post #15 and on): http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?t=372686

Novice Lifter Version – Single Factor:
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4497774&postcount=15

Weight Selection/Time Between Sets/Exercise Substitution:
(The long and short is Important/Take what you need/Don't fuck with this especially the squats. Adding some arm work once a week is fine. Subbing incline for standing military is fine. Adding core work and doing cardio is fine. Do not sub in a machine variant unless you are injured or over 65.)
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?t=372686
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?t=371821
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4646743&postcount=201
Sample Layout (don’t read too much into this, it’s just some random selections to illustrate how the weight would progress to the record weeks): http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4652618&postcount=211

Some Results From Members:
blut wump: http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4623386&postcount=125
super_rice: http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4631651&postcount=140
Ghettostudmuffin:...Week 5: http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4633372&postcount=154
...........................Week 6: http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4636680&postcount=166
BionicBC: http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4734736&postcount=345
Ceasar989:....http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4643420&postcount=185
...................http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4690062&postcount=289

Why Haven’t Most BBers Heard of This Type of Training if It’s so Commonly Used Around the World for Athletics, Powerlifting, and Olympic Lifting?
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4627437&postcount=133
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4658210&postcount=234

Beyond the 5x5 – Planning Your Training Cycles:
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4643459&postcount=186

For the Drug Users – The Training Cycle and Anabolics:
(Note - I do not condone or advise the use of drugs (and really, the whole point in this is to give people a program that can actually get good results without drugs) but this comes up semi-frequently and the reason a lot of people got into drugs in the first place was because their training stalled out for a prolonged period so it makes sense to address this also so that everyone can benefit)
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4633338&postcount=153





Exercise Descriptions / A Few Other Very Successful Programs / Acceleration – Do Not Ignore This


Why Speed/Acceleration is Critical in Lifting:
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4624616&postcount=62

Correct Way to Perform Barbell Rows:
(2 Variations – the one at the bottom of page 1 is best)
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?t=366601
Links to pics: http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4697367&postcount=301

The Only Shrug – The Power Shrug:
(Toss out the bullshit standard shrug - enjoy big increases in the mirror and increase your explosive power all at once)
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4712284&postcount=319

Glenn Pendlay on Mark Ripptoe’s Squat Program for New Lifters:
(routinely gets 30-40lbs of bodyweight increase within 6 months)
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4658227&postcount=235

Smolov Squat Cycle:
(Considered the holy grail of squat programs - very demanding)
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4610310&postcount=107

Some General Exercise Description and Video Links:
Very detailed Squat, Deadlift, and Benchpress descriptions are stickied in the PLing forum these are 'must reads' for every lifter:
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7
Videos:
http://www.uwlax.edu/strengthcenter/videos/video_index.htm
http://www.joeskopec.com/assist.html
http://www.bsu.edu/webapps/strengthlab/Home.htm







Sources for Knowledge, Interviews, Articles

Good Sources of Knowledge/Books/Links:
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4323293&postcount=3

Interview with Strength Coach Glenn Pendlay:
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4633481&postcount=155

Renowned Speed Coach Charlie Francis on HIT:
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4678430&postcount=285

WSB Louie Simmons – What a Gym Needs:
http://www.deepsquatter.com/strength/archives/ls8.htm
 
Last edited:
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Jim Ouini said:
I've been doing touch and go. 2 and 3rd reps felt real easy :(

Yeah - that's kind of why they call it the "dead"lift as in the weight being dead on the ground. The main issue you are going to have is that the first rep is a lot harder than the subsequent ones so when you increase each week that first rep becomes a lot more of a load than it would normally be if all reps were from a deweight on the floor and identical like the rest of your exercises. Luckily this is a good break point so maybe drop back to 300/295ish (maybe more - see how it feels) for week 6 and complete the intensity phase doing it without the touch and go. Use week 6 as a barometer and just make conservative jumps to shoot for really pushing yourself week 9 and maybe week 8 if things fall into line and you guesstimate correctly. Not the end of the world though. You could have subbed leg press for full squats or something like that.
 
Last edited:
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Madcow2 said:
Yeah - that's kind of why they call it the "dead"lift as in the weight being dead on the ground. The main issue you are going to have is that the first rep is a lot harder than the subsequent ones so when you increase each week that first rep becomes a lot more of a load than it would normally be if all reps were from a deweight on the floor and identical like the rest of your exercises. Luckily this is a good break point so maybe drop back to 300/295ish for week 6 and complete the intensity phase doing it without the touch and go. Use week 6 as a barometer and just make conservative jumps to shoot for really pushing yourself week 9 and maybe week 8 if things fall into line and you guesstimate correctly. Not the end of the world though. You could have subbed leg press for full squats or something like that.

Thank you for the reply. I was actually wondering this exact question since I understood the key for the next 4 wks is to keep upping the weights, and dropping down a bit to accomodate for the 'dead' in the deadlift might compromise this.

I'll gauge the weights next week as I pyramid up, maybe I can handle the same. It is the intensity phase after all and to be honest reps 2 and 3 with touch & go didn't feel all that intense.
 
Crap, I've been doing the 'touch and go' method myself. Between this, the barbell rows (and just figuring out how to do them a week ago) and my lightweights (was coming off of being sick when I started so I was conservative with weight selection), I'll just chalk up this round to being a learning experience and nail it all the next time around.

That being said, I'm still making some pretty impressive progress this time around.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Jim Ouini said:
Thank you for the reply. I was actually wondering this exact question since I understood the key for the next 4 wks is to keep upping the weights, and dropping down a bit to accomodate for the 'dead' in the deadlift might compromise this.

I'll gauge the weights next week as I pyramid up, maybe I can handle the same. It is the intensity phase after all and to be honest reps 2 and 3 with touch & go didn't feel all that intense.
The issue if you are using the 3x per week deloading/intensity protocol is that you still need room to ramp the weights and the deadlift is very strenuous so this is the wrong lift to train too heavily because it might make inroads too quickly rather than leave you fresh for weeks 8/9. If you are using the 2x per week it won't be a big deal.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Madcow2 said:
The issue if you are using the 3x per week deloading/intensity protocol is that you still need room to ramp the weights and the deadlift is very strenuous so this is the wrong lift to train too heavily because it might make inroads too quickly rather than leave you fresh for weeks 8/9. If you are using the 2x per week it won't be a big deal.

Actually I'm doing the 3x per week deloading.

I read through the 2x week deload; so the basic difference I see is that in the switch to 3 x 3 instead of dropping squats on Wed, you drop the Friday workout altogether.

What are the factors one should consider when deciding which deloading protocol to use?

I read in the 2x/3x deloading link you provided that 'inadequate deloading due to improperly setting your weights' in the 3x/week will screw it up.

I had planned on simply upping my weights 5-10lbs every week from Wk 5. Is the risk in setting the weights too high too soon? I thought I read somewhere (probably in this thread) that if you fail at a weight in the intensity phase to keep pushing on through (maybe I read this wrong).

Also, you mention that one may need to adjust during this phase as well, with an extra day of rest or slashing volume (I guess this means an entire workout) - what are the factors here - missing lifts? or just physically tired/burned out?

Sorry for all the questions and if they'd already been answered in the links above.
 
The 3x per week protocol generally includes too much volume for most people to adequately deload properly and still ramp up to records for 1x3 and 3x3 in weeks 8/9. The increasing 5-10lbs per week was for the 2x per week deload but you could use it here for a few weeks if it makes sense for you. In the 3x per week you need to have targets figured for 3x3 and 1x3 and gradually progress to those over weeks 6-9. A lot of people have gotten away with keeping the weights relatively light and really only pushing records in week 9 rather than both 8/9 being greater than a relevant previous record, then deloading again before the next volume phase. That certainly will work. Another option is to take extra days and/or cut some volume as needed but "as needed" implicitly assumes some experience for a reference and most people doing this for the first time don't have that luxury.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Carl Carlson said:
Crap, I've been doing the 'touch and go' method myself. Between this, the barbell rows (and just figuring out how to do them a week ago) and my lightweights (was coming off of being sick when I started so I was conservative with weight selection), I'll just chalk up this round to being a learning experience and nail it all the next time around.

That being said, I'm still making some pretty impressive progress this time around.

It would be a shitty program if you had to nail everything perfectly to see decent results. This thing is really hard to screw up too badly. As long as people don't swap in machines or screw with it too much, it's really kind of autopilot. Obviously getting 100% may not be in the cards but 70% of a really productive 2 month training cycle is still more than most people on your standard Flex magazine program are likely to see in a year. The nice thing is that once you've gone through it once, your weight selection will be near perfect and you'll have a very solid understanding of your own tolerances so it becomes a lot easier to get as much as possible out of this or a similar style program.
 
tomorrow is the end of week two..I had to skip wednesday adn do cardio instead (2 hours of bball) since I jacked my back up doing rows...but tomorrow I am back on track, and I iwll throw in the pullups (since i missed them on wed) and sub the row with tbar rows with light weight so I keep my back in a recoop mode..do you think I lost too much by missing wednesday??? thanks
 
Would it be bad to split up some of the Day2 and Day3 work into a fourth day? Deadlifts knock the stuffing out of me and so do heavy squats on a Friday. I was thinking in terms of moving the Military Press and Chins/Pullups from Day2 and the barbell rows from Day3 to Thursday for a Day2.5.

I'm really thinking in terms of Week4. Volume would be unchanged on the week but fatigue levels might be changed with the alteration. It'd also mean that I'd be working back without having just worked chest which may be sub-optimal.
 
Generally, when you make an alteration like that you want to be consistent throughout the program as it can cause some variation in the weights you are able to lift for a given exercise. I don't see any problem with the layout though.
 
Not a bad idea, Blut. I'd be wary to change it around too much myself, since this is my first time going through it. I agree with Madcow in that it could change some weights around if you're not consistent, due to the level of fatigue when you hit the exercise, as opposed to hitting it fresh.

Still, the overall weekly volume is the important part, so you could probably get away with doing work on Tuesday/Thursday to divide it up. Not much need be moved around aside from deadlifts, though. It's food for though, definitely.
 
It might be a good thing to lift a little more for week4 on a couple of exercises. If I'd thought about it earlier I probably still wouldn't have made the change until this week since weeks one and two were fine.

Week3's deadlift PR just put me on empty. I couldn't even power clean my warmups for Military Press and had to rest. Throw in the chins afterwards for two sets of 3 (yay, I can now do bodyweight for reps!) and then pulldowns to make up the volume. By today I was one big ache and the squats threw me back to almost empty which left the bench a struggle and then up came another 5x5 max attempt on rows. I was down to willpower again and being explosive was neither natural nor really attained.

I thought messing with week4 wouldn't distress the program if I don't lose volume and I'll be dropping down to the 2x intensity phase this time so big changes are imminent anyway. Maybe I need to work a lot more on my GPP for the future or maybe I didn't deload adequately from last cycle or maybe I'm just very susceptible to deadlift weariness.

I might leave the Military Press on the Wednesday since it might impinge on my triceps for Friday bench if moved to Thursday. At least I'll be fresh for chins and rows.
 
You'll be fine. The deadlift is taxing for everyone - maybe moreso to you because you are so new to it. Spread the volume for now and just grunt it out. Weeks 3/4 are what really determine the success of your training cycle. Plus, all of this provides more information to you about your tolerances. Maybe you are most suseptible to the deadlift right now (there is a reason why Westside avoids it), maybe 10 days of really heavy loading is adequate for you under these conditions. Maybe to get the most out of your squat you cut the deadlift back to 3x5 for the volume phase or substitute high pulls (although from the sound of it you are benefiting from the lift). All just food for thought but this is the kind of stuff you are learning.
 
Thanks. Very encouraging.

There's a personal involvement with the deadlift which I don't feel with the other exercises. I feel anxiety every time I attempt it and a real sense of achievement at the end of a set. Maybe being new to it is part of that. I love it.
 
I just finished Wk 5 Day 3 (same weights as wk 4 of volume but 3 x 3/1x3)

I tried the mythical (to me, anyway) ATF squats for the first time. For most folks here it appears to be the de facto standard but for me I've always thought parallel was good enough and to be truthful I've missed parallel when going really heavy. Not quarter squats by any means but hips definitely above knee level.

This may not be the best time to introduce a revamped squat form but what the hell I'm kind of obsessed now with getting deep into the hole. I think like 'touch and go' deadlifts I'm going to take stock and adjust if necessary.

Anyway, looking up at a point high on the wall really helped me. I used to look straight ahead at the mirror but I felt my back was rounding too much the deeper I got.

Also, I had to narrow my stance to about shoulder width; therefore I felt my quads working a bit more. Still messing around with foot angle and suchlike.

If anyone else has any tip's 'n tricks I'd appreciate it.

I did 1-2 rep warmups up to my set of 1 x 3 (about 7 sets total. Hope that's not too much volume).

It went pretty well up to 295. Then 315 I think I missed it (my hips shot back a bit trying to get out of the hole) and 325 (which I tried since it's my max 1 x 3 day and using the same weight as last week) I didn't get low enough.

Still, I"m somewhat encouraged since I thought I'd have to start all over again at 135.

Bench
Bar x 10
135 x 5
185 x 2
230 x 3 x 3

I've never liked benching. Mostly because I suck at it. Much prefer incline db press but no biggie.

BB row
Bar x 10
135 x 5
185 x 2
235 x 3 x 3

These felt good. Nice and tight, elbow didn't hurt.
 
I went ahead and did what i said..pullups with 35 pounds for 5x5 (though Ineeded a spot on set 4-5 on the last rep) and squats went up to 280, so I am happy about that...bench went DOWN???? I missed hte DB incline on wed..but I went down five pounds and it was STILL hard?? oh well, I guess just a bad day...MOnday could be better (starting week three, daunting)---I also threw in some hammer curls; I did these after the pullups--man you sure drop weight..about ten pounds I dropped..I love this program...I cannot wait till I can row again...I cannot wait for the second time I do this program.


mith
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Bill Starr - Glenn Pendlay 5x5

Periodized Version for Advanced Lifters

Intro to Periodization



Note: I have a more complete and better formatted description along with a template download and a ton of other information in this link: http://www.geocities.com/elitemadcow1/5x5_Program/Periodized_5x5.htm. This will be the final update to this post, anything new will go in the Geocities site. In addition as this is a cut/paste some of the weblinks that are intended to be in the description are not active so when you see "...link here" and there's no link. This is why.


If you've just randomly come to this topic or been provided a link - there is a large amount of information here: Table of Contents



-------------------------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION:

Okay, this is a simple program - the problem is that people have very little experience setting something like this up so we now have a giant document and all kinds of crap to answer the questions that most often arise (even some of the most inane ones). This is simple, effective, and very direct training. You will see how simple it is after you do it once but people seem to do a lot better with a surplus of information than a deficit so this is a very comprehensive piece that should answer just about everything.


HISTORY:

This program and variants have been making the rounds on the internet for a few years now. Variations have been made for specific lifters, it’s been rehashed and re-explained by various people ranging from your standard guy who had a lot of success with it all the way to some fairly high level coaches in multiple sports using it on their athletes or using it to illustrate periodization. It’s been cut/pasted into articles, internet forums, interviews, etc… Heck I've put it out there a lot and tried to give credit to every source I could locate as I was able but still my name wound up getting attached to it even though I was pretty clear that this was not a program I designed. This version here is one that I've tweaked a bit in an effort to make it more accessible to the variety of people using a program like this for the first time (i.e. trying to set it up to be as tolerable as possible). All that said the real origins stretch back fairly far but for practical application there are three primary sources who are responsible for it’s popularity over the most recent 30 years: Bill Starr, Glenn Pendlay, and Mark Rippetoe.

Bill Starr: This is a variation of Bill Starr's classic 5x5. Bill is without doubt one of the best strength coaches ever, serving at multiple universities, pro teams – including the Super Bowl 1970 Colts, and holding records in both PL and OL. His articles are frequently reprinted in Milo, have appeared in Ironman for years (they might still be in there periodically), and are generally all over the strength and conditioning world. His book on training for football, 'The Strongest Shall Survive', is a classic for coaches, players, and any strength athlete - you can pick it up at Ironmind.

Glenn Pendlay: An accomplished powerlifter and Olympic weightlifter in his own right and a fantastic strength coach, Glenn has found his real calling training and developing others. He founded and serves as the head coach for Wichita Falls Weightlifting – which he has quickly turned into one of the best teams in the nation. He is also the coach of the MSU weightlifting team, head coach of a Regional Olympic Development Center. Coming to OL relatively late he still managed to snatch 170 kilos (375lbs), cleaned 210kilos (463lbs), push pressed 200 kilos (440lbs), and military pressed within a few pounds of 400 on multiple occasions. You can learn more about him in his interview.

Mark Rippetoe: Owner of Wichita Falls Athletic Club, co-author of Starting Strength, is well known for his outrageous success in adding muscular bodyweight to new lifters (30-40lbs in 4-6 months being fairly typical). Has trained countless lifters over the years. Link to his interview.

For those interested in a more full overview of how Mark and Glenn typically train their athletes this is a solid piece to read: http://www.readthecore.com/200510/markr.htm


USAGE:

This program and variations are very much in common use all over the place even being common to elite athletes in various sports. This program is very effective at increasing strength and lean body mass, if focuses on the core lifts that drive full body hypertrophy and getting those lifts up as quickly as possible. There is little isolation work and what is generally used is targeted and specific, not the typical shotgun array of ‘let’s do everything and the kitchen sink’ that serves mainly to dilute a program’s effectiveness. Solve problems as they arise, do not waste time trying to preempt every possible future issue one can imagine. Most people who haven’t trained like this tend to be pretty amazed that the body grows very proportionately all on it’s own from a small assortment of compound lifts. The idea is you do a few things and get systematically better at them over time, don’t try to do everything all at once. Focus on what matters most and remove all the garbage so you can do it a lot and get really good.

People have had a lot of success using something like this while cutting. I have seen a number of reports of people keeping bodyweight constant, losing body fat, and increasing in most relevant measurements (chest, thigh, arms) so that says something. If you are close to a weight class limit you’ll need to be very careful. All that said, this program will make you strong but if you want to put on muscle there absolutely must be caloric excess. Read my piece on caloric excess if you haven’t already, more people screw this up than anything else. This program has gotten results for 30 years and still continues to get excellent results from bodybuilders, strength athletes, or those looking for better performance. It is a very good method of getting big and strong. In addition, specific to bodybuilding it breaks a lot of the typical voodoo myths running around like “training a muscle 1x per week is required for recovery” or that “isolation work is required or one will develop all out of proportion”. This program is about simple training and results. However, there is a ton of science behind it and one would do well to familiarize themselves with dual factor theory and the properly used concepts of volume, frequency, intensity, and workload. There is more to training than simply going into the gym, getting under a bar, and working hard hoping to come back better. So by running this program one gets gains and learns at the same time, sort of a "teach a man to fish..."

This program is not ideally done as a “cookie-cutter” but should be tailored to the experience level of the trainee. It is setup here for an experienced lifter who is completely familiar with the core lifts and is beginning periodization (i.e. with experience making week to week record progress becomes less and less a reality for all lifters over time so this would be a balanced version to use) . For most people unfamiliar with this style of training, which is a lot more taxing than doing a bunch of isolation work, it’s a good starting point. Some might find that they can be more aggressive with the weights and load harder, some might need more volume, some might find themselves doing really well in the volume phase and realizing that a single factor program with more emphasis on frequency and the core lifts is what might work best as significant strength increase during the initial phase would be a good indicator that linear progress is still available but programming must be improved (i.e. you don't need periodization, you need a good training program). Anyway, it’s a progression not a static cookie cutter although we have to start somewhere which is why I’ve drawn it up the way I have. I’ve tried my best to cover that as have others but still people get attached. As a lifter progressed workload will be expanded and obviously you can’t just keep hammering the same thing again and again. The programming interview from Pendlay and Rippetoe here http://www.readthecore.com/200510/markr.htm can probably provide more insight and they have a book coming out with Lon Kilgore called Practical Periodization (available early 2006) that is intended to cover multiyear training plans and development.


-------------------------------------------------------------
CORE DESCRIPTION:

Before beginning it is useful to know your 1 rep maxes or more ideally your real 5 rep max in each lift (there is a table and calculator in the TOC). You can base your 5x5 max off your 5 rep max just by cutting back a bit. If you don't know this - it might be useful to test your lifts first or start light and allow for some flexibility in the weekly planning so you can make adjustments on the fly as you ramp the weights week to week to across the board records in the final weeks of the volume phase. Don't overly stress on this - it's easier than it sounds and once you've run it once, subsequent cycles fall right into place.

Loading/Volume (Weeks 1-4)

Exercise Sets x Reps
Details


Monday
Squat 5x5
Bench 1x5
Barbell Row 1x5

Wednesday
Squat 5x5
10-20% less than Monday
Deadlift 5x5
Incline or Military 5x5
Pullups 3x3

Friday
Squat 1x5
Bench 5x5
Row 5x5

OPTION 1: Deload and Peak (Weeks 5-9)

Exercise Sets x Reps
Details


Monday
Squat 3x3
Bench 1x3
Barbell Row 1x3

Wednesday
Deadlift 3x3
Incline or Military 3x3
Pullups 3x3

Friday
Squat 1x3
Bench 3x3
Row 3x3

OPTION 2: Pure Deload (Weeks 5-6 or Extended)

Exercise Sets x Reps
Details


Monday
Squat 3x3
Bench 3x3
Barbell Row 3x3

Wednesday or Thursday
Squat 3x3
30% less than Monday
Deadlift 3x3
Incline or Military 3x3


Clarifying Examples:

5x5 and 3x3 are straight sets with working set weight:
i.e. 315x5, 315x5, 315x5, 315x5, 315x5 in the case of 5x5 and 315x3, 315x3, 315x3 in the case of 3x3

1x5 and 1x3 are ramped sets of 5x5 and 3x3 respectively with the weights increasing set to set over fairly even intervals:
i.e. 225x5, 255x5, 275x5, 295x5, 315x5 in the case of 1x5 and 275x3, 295x3, 315x3 in the case of 1x3


Volume/Loading Phase (Weeks 1-4):

So 5x5 is 5 sets of 5 reps with working set weight (warm up to the target weight for the week and proceed through 5x5 with that weight). Where 1x5 is present you are ramping the weights upward each set to a target set weight for a single set of 5 (it's still 5x5 but each set gets heavier and your target set is the top set of 5). The exception is the Wednesday squat for 5x5 using somewhere between 10-20% less than the working weight on the Monday 5x5 workout (the Wed squat may increase less than the Monday squat over the ramping weeks - meaning it may start at 12% less and wind up at 22% less by the last record week if one needs some extra recovery). What you are doing is gradually increasing the target weights week to week so you wind up performing record lifts in the final two weeks of the volume phase (weeks 3/4 in this case). If you miss a weight, hold it constant for the next week by carrying it forward (you should not be missing until weeks 3/4 though). Keep in mind that you have separate targets for 5x5 and 1x5 even though they are the same lift (i.e. bench press). The ramping is set separately for these and they are treated separately. It's a good idea to start conservatively as this gets fairly backbreaking and you'll be begging for week 5. The most common mistake is people starting too high. It's useful to start light and then be flexible either adding an extra week to the ramp up or moving your targets a bit as you feel your way. This is far easier in the intensity phase because you already have a reference - likewise the next time you run this workout, it'll be a no brainer. The main point in this phase is the volume. Lower the weight if need be but get the sets and reps in. If you fail on an exercise just carry the target weight forward into the next week. Some people who are new to this might find it easier to run this phase for 6 weeks starting much lighter and building slowly. If your working weights for the deadlift are 2x bodyweight (meaning you are a 200lbs lifter and you'll be doing 400+ for 5x5 throughout the cycle) it's probably a good idea to do lower the volume on that lift to 3x5 in this phase.

The easiest way to set this up the first time is to put current PRs in week 3 (with more experience and relevant lifts you might have new PR goals in both weeks 3 and 4). Your 5RM can be calculated and just drop off a given percentage for your 5x5RM (try 7.5% maybe) you get a week 3 figure for those lifts. Now back down to week 1. A conservative number to start with might be 80% of your Week 3 PR lift then split the difference for Week 2. If you are really strong (and jumps are large), you might need more weeks to ramp up. What you don't want to do is start too high, you can always tack on another week but if you start too high you blow the progression. Anyway, week 4 lifts are a margin above week 3, maybe 5%. It's important to plan it out and then play it by ear as you go, adjust where need be so that you culminate with the 2 final weeks. If that means starting lighter and running for 6 weeks that's fine. If that means, you thought 4 weeks was fine but you were unexpectedly stronger (or got stronger during this phase) and need to add an extra week to avoid a big jump, that's okay too - just be very conscious of fatigue level. Your first time through you'll feel pretty beat up after the last week, that's okay. If you are beat up entering the 2nd to last week, that's something to watch. You want to 'overreach' which is before overtraining. Sometimes you'll encounter a performance deficit and not be able to set PRs (very common for advanced athletes loading hard), without experience though you don't want to push it too hard and overdo it - takes too damn long to recover from.


Option 1: Deload and Peak 3x3 (Weeks 5-9):

This option provides for deloading in the middle weeks and working toward new PRs in the final weeks (think of it as almost 2 loading phases as the 2nd will likely fatigue you by the time you are done). This makes it a bit harder to handle particularly for first timers. In addition, trainees might need a light week or two before moving back into another loading period.

Deloading Week - Week 5:
On week 5 drop the Wednesday squat workout, begin using the Deloading/Intensity set/rep scheme, and keep the weight the same as your last week in the Volume Phase. In reality the whole intensity phase and this week are the same thing, I just break this week out because there is no weight progression so in reality after the volume phase the whole thing is deloading/intensity which for the purposes of this workout are synonymous. Also my 3x per week layout tends to get pretty aggressive as many find themselves fatigued again by the end so it kind of makes logical sense to break this period separately. Largely semantics.

Intensification Phase - Week 6-9:
Everything is the same principal except that you use 3x3 and 1x3 setting records on week 8 and 9 (or the final 2 weeks of this phase). No Wednesday squatting. It's important that you recover before getting into the heavy weight PRs again so if you have to keep Week 6 light, go ahead. The important aspect of this phase is the weight increases. If you are burned out and you need an extra day here and there that's okay - this won't hurt you at all and unless you are feeling ripe it might well be beneficial. If you can't do all the work that's okay too. Just keep increasing the weight week to week. It might also help to keep the first week in this phase just incrementally higher than the Deloading Week to provide for extra recovery if needed. During this phase you'll be ramping the weights from your deloading week to your 3x3 and 1x3 records in the final 2 weeks. In this 3x per week pattern, start light once again and get a breather. Taking extra days or cutting out volume isn’t encouraged but if you need extra recovery do it and then adjust your future training plans accordingly. If you don’t get an adequate deload first (that 1 week may not be enough) you will cripple your gains. Better to get 90% out of a training cycle than 10%. You'll learn a lot about your tolerance for volume loading and unloading here - there is no need to try to be a hero. Get some experience and the next time you run this you'll be spot on but you wind up feeling your way to a degree the first time.

Post Cycle:
Depending upon how you feel, it's probably a good idea to deload again before moving back into another volume phase if you ran the 3x per week like I outlined above. See the alternative schedule below and perform this light for 2 weeks working on speed/acceleration. If you ran the 2x alternate schedule below for your deload/intensity you can likely move straight back into another volume phase.


Option 2: Pure Deload (Weeks 5-6 or Extended)

This is designed to get you recovered without too much hassle or worry. Frequency is dropped to 2x per week and the Friday workout is dropped. The Wednesday workout can be moved to Thursday if desired. This phase can be run as long as needed to recover or until one wants to do something else. Maybe that's 1-2 weeks for some people to build enough steam to jump back into a loading phase. Maybe that's 4-5 weeks if someone feels they are really getting a lot out of it.

Week 5 and on switch to 3x3 and drop the Friday workout altogether. Week 5 weights are the same as the final week of loading. Over the following weeks increase the weight workout to workout if you get all 9 reps. If you don't get all the reps, keep the weight constant. You'll likely be able to move straight back into another volume phase after this is complete. As for the increases week to week, probably best to use a percentage but to make it easy for first timers maybe add 5lbs to benches and rows then 10lbs to squats and deads.


-------------------------------------------------------------
OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION

The Lifts:
Squats - these should be full range Olympic style squats. Use the full range of your body - that means as low as you can go which for almost everyone is past parallel. If the top of your thighs aren't at least parallel it's for shit. If you think this is bad for your knees going low, you and whoever told you that are relying on an old wives tale. Anyone who knows the human body will tell you that below parallel is MUCH safer on the knees whereas parallel and above put all the sheer right on them and doesn’t allow proper transfer of the load to the rest of your body (this is how your body was designed). Read the Squat article from Arioch linked in the TOC for a complete description and references on the mechanics of the squat and depth.
Deads - each rep is deweighted fully on the floor. No touch and go. This is called the 'dead'lift because the weight is 'dead' on the ground. You can touch and go warm ups but that's it.
Military - standing overhead presses. Supporting weight overhead is a fundamental exercise and stimulates the whole body. Push presses are a fine substitute.
Rows - 90 degrees and done dynamically (Accelerate the weight into your body - do not jerk it but constantly increase the pace like an oar through water). There is a TOC topic on rows, a good read that also illustrates a version done from the floor.
Common Sense - you should know how to do the lifts before starting a program like this. Start light and learn. Don't include brand new compound lifts that have you training near your limit without some time in. This is how you get hurt. Compound lifts load the entire body and are very effective. If you have a weak link, they will bring it up - of course if you haven't trained the lift long enough for this to happen your weak link may get you hurt. Use your brain.
The rest is self explanatory.


Time Between Sets:

Don't over think this. Use a natural rep speed, take what you need between sets. Don't be lazy but don't rush. You can't be doing rapid fire sets of big compound lifts. Maybe on the lightest warm-ups you take a minute but most sets will be 2-5 minute range with 2 being between fairly easy sets and 5 being after a heavy set in preparation for another very serious major effort that drains you. I can see exceeding the 5 minute limit by a tad when really pushing near failure in the PR weeks when you are uncertain of getting your reps on your last set. Just use your brain and don't micromanage.


Diet:

Depends on whether you are trying to gain muscle or what. I will say that for gaining muscle, caloric excess must be present. Read the caloric excess topic in the table of contents. More people, particularly bodybuilders, go wrong here. If caloric excess is present and training stinks, you will get fatter. The few guys who have come back with no weight gain got very strong and gained no net weight - guess what - they were already fairly lean (i.e. no excess in their diet otherwise they'd have been fatter) and they didn't gain fat or muscle (no caloric excess during training). There's nothing any program can do if you won't eat. For the purposes of gaining muscle or getting big and strong it's better to eat McDonalds and KFC all day long than not eat enough Zen clean ultra pure food which might be healthier but if not enough there's simply nothing to use to grow. So caloric excess is a requirement, you don't need to eat like a slob but it will work infinitely better than not eating enough healthy food for this purpose. Lots of people have gotten big and strong on diets that were bad, if you choose to eat squeaky clean, kudos to you but it is not critical to putting on muscle (it might be critical to a long high quality life though).


Learning about Your Tolerances/Setting Up Your 2nd Training Cycle:
This can be somewhat daunting to set your weights the first time you run this and for reasons already stated it's a lot better to be on the conservative side. I don’t provide percentages because this is very individual and I want people to pay attention to their bodies and learn – stated percentages have a way of short circuiting the learning mechanism even in the face of common sense. Once you've been through this once, you'll learn a lot about your tolerances and you'll have a set of very relevant records which you can sub right into the next training cycle. Your best 5x5 would become week 3 and then week 4 a margin above it (this is conservative) - or ideally week 3 would exceed your best 5x5 by a margin and then week 4 above that (this makes for a tougher loading cycle and this is one of the things you'll learn whether or not to do for your current state of conditioning). In addition, if you are really loading hard, performance will decline towards the end so setting records and actually getting the lifts may not be possible (and that’s okay because the juice comes on the other end). The other lifts 1x5, 3x3, 1x3 are similarly adjusted based on previous records. Also, people's tolerances vary widely at every level. Take 2 top competitive lifters - they may lift exactly the same weight, have similar training history, and be equally sized but one requires a massive amount of volume in training while another does not. No ego just what each needs to stimulate progress. As you go, you'll learn all about what you need, what you can handle, and what is too much. Eventually, you'll be able to tailor this program or an entire 6 month training cycle to your individual specs and requirements. Obviously reading the Training Theory topics in the TOC is going to really assist in providing you a framework in how to quantify and design your programs.


Incorporating the Olympic Lifts:

The above is basically setup for someone who doesn't know the OLs. Starr's original workout included Power Cleans and High Pulls. Instead of Bent Rows substitute Power Cleans. Rather than Deads substitute High Pulls. That’s a quick and dirty way of handling this without much disruption.


Substituting Exercises:

Don't fuck with this. Every bodybuilder seems to have Attention Deficit Disorder and an overwhelming desire to customize everything. The bottom line is that these are all the most effective exercises and just about anything one does will result in less gains. As a rule those people who want to change it don't know enough to make proper alterations - those who do know enough, don't have much to change. The guy who is responsible for this program is of the best on the planet at bulking lifters and making people stronger. It's kind of like Sesame Street's Elmo offering neurosurgery advice at NYU. Anyway, it's absolutely essential not to screw with the squats, they are the foundation of this program. If you want to sub inclines or push presses for military that's okay. Do not sub machines - don't even think about it, hit yourself with a plate if you must. For arms choose a single biceps and triceps exercise and perform them at the end once per week for 3 sets of whatever - your arms will take a beating from all the pulling and pressing anyway. If you want to chin on Wednesday or do a few sets of pulldowns/ups that's fine (avoid the machines if you can use bodyweight). Core work is always fine. Cardio is fine - interval training is the best for this I'll just throw out. If this is just too much mental strain, take solace in the fact that it's just a few weeks, you'll gain a ton of muscle and strength and then you can spend the next 4 weeks adding the minute detail to refine the gained mass (like most care anyway - I have yet to meet a guy on this board who will trade 20lbs of muscle for a bit of added detail somewhere). In a nutshell, put your trust in some of the better coaches on the planet and enjoy the results.


Bands/Chains/Speed/DE:
If you don't know what this is, don't worry about it. Read up on Westside sometime - it's not integral to the program but incorporating work like this into your training cycles can be worthwhile no matter if you are a PL, general athlete looking for performance or bodybuilder. For those that do and want to incorporate them, the 1x5 days are the days you would choose for these in the generic layout.


New or Novice Lifters:
A dual factor program is unnecessary. This is more work than you need and slower progression. Why add weight once every 4-8 weeks if you can string together new personal records for weeks at a time back to back. I really recommend Rippetoe's Starting Strength for beginners or novices. It's so critical to learn the lifts correctly and get started on a good program (i.e. not what one typically finds on bodybuilding sites).


Advanced Lifters:

As one learns about one's tolerances and progresses over time one will generally find that one is able to gradually accommodate more volume. Some might find it more advantageous from a recovery standpoint to do all their 5x5 work on Monday and save the 1x5 for Friday. In terms of this generic template what generally happens is that a lifter will remove the pyramid 1x5 workouts and swap them into a second 5x5 over time. In addition, an advanced lifter might start their ramps much closer to their record weights (that said, this same lifter might need a longer period of acclimation before being able to handle record weights so a lot depends on the individual and the current state of the athlete). As one's weights increase the volume can also be spread over 4 days rather than 3 to accommodate the fatigue from the heavier weights – especially the Wednesday deadlift. These lifters might also compress the training cycle into 2-3 weeks of loading and 1-2 weeks of deloading once they are geared up and training hard (this would be within the context of a longer training plan like a planned out Macrocycle – give a read to Planning Your Training Cycle and the Training Theory section of the TOC). I'm just going to state, this stuff is for someone who has spent some time doing this type of work. I only include this for completeness because it is needed to illustrate progression and if I put an “advanced” version down you can bet everyone would be doing it, burning out, making zero progress, and I’d be “wrong” and this program would be “bad”. The way I have it listed above will overload just about anyone besides an accomplished seasoned lifter and push them to their limit if they set their weight right. You apply more volume when you need it, not as an ego thing. This will destroy or drastically limit your gains. Don't do this unless you've run many dual factor training cycles and are absolutely sure you need it. I'm being overly cautious but most people on this board come from a bodybuilding background where typical programs are the 3 day split variety hitting each muscle 1x per week. This base program itself is a whole different world of volume and the tweaks here can make it much more taxing and in every single case that I've seen where someone is even relatively new to this style of program - they should not be employed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
FYI to everyone who hasn't looked at the first page in a while. A linked Table of Contents was added to the first post (resulted in me rewriting the above which kind of needed to be done anyway since my original description was written in all of about 5 minutes a few years back). It indexes just about all of the best info in this thread as well as other stuff I've referenced at different sites. Given that we are way out in the page numbers now - I figured it's unrealistic to expect someone to read the entire thread so this simplifies things a bit. Hope this helps.
 
Madcow2 said:
You'll be fine. The deadlift is taxing for everyone - maybe moreso to you because you are so new to it. Spread the volume for now and just grunt it out. Weeks 3/4 are what really determine the success of your training cycle. Plus, all of this provides more information to you about your tolerances. Maybe you are most suseptible to the deadlift right now (there is a reason why Westside avoids it), maybe 10 days of really heavy loading is adequate for you under these conditions. Maybe to get the most out of your squat you cut the deadlift back to 3x5 for the volume phase or substitute high pulls (although from the sound of it you are benefiting from the lift). All just food for thought but this is the kind of stuff you are learning.
Well, it's become fairly moot after I twisted my knee over the weekend on being barged by a horse. There are few things more humbling (or stupid) than trying to pit muscles against a three-quarter ton animal.

Anyway, I can't squat for toffees now and deadlifts are probably not an option either so I'm going straight into deload for a week or two and decide whether to start again at week 1 or attempt an intensity phase. I don't think I have any serious injury there but I can't squat bodyweight without pain today. Ho hum.
 
So Madcow, how would one apply the concepts of the program if they are looking to keep gaining size as opposed to strength? How might the program be chaged up or look different (if at all)?
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

slyder190 said:
So Madcow, how would one apply the concepts of the program if they are looking to keep gaining size as opposed to strength? How might the program be chaged up or look different (if at all)?

Well the reason why I put it on a BBing board is primarily because it's a really great size program. Much of the gains show up in the deloading/intenisty phase. People here are a bit lucky because they've seen gains throughout but this is more because this style of training is so new to most (it's like getting someone who has trained on all machines doing deads and squats - the program itself won't matter all that much at first because they are going to explode with gains for a while just by putting in some time in the rack). If someone is a more advanced lifter that has accrued a fairly solid tolerance they generally see their strength and size increases in the deloading/intensity periods rather than throughout the program.

All that said, a lot of the tweaking that one can do is heavily dependent upon one's own tolerances. This is why I try to be so thorough because in reality, nearly everyone on the forum is their own coach and they will slowly gain information that will enable them to tweak the program properly over time (i.e. they have to start the intenisty phase with fairly light weights because week 5 doesn't provide them with enough of a deload, or they can start their weights higher in both the volume and intensity phase, maybe they eventually are able to hande more volume than this program provides). So the generic write up is designed so that just about anyone that is familiar with the exercises and has a couple years of training under their belts can get in and make solid progress (there is a novice 5x5 and Ripptoes novice squatting program in the TOC now too for those that haven't been at this long enough to make a dual factor style program necessary).

The intensity phase itself will accrue more size, make no mistake (especially my 3x which tends to reload the athlete as he nears the record weeks if he's not taking prodigous extra days and cutting out volume). The only thing I'm doing is slashing the volume down a bit because you can't keep the pace of a good loading period up for long. Even if the intensity phase only provided pure strength and enhanced neural efficiency (plus some recovery for your gains from the volume), that enhanced strength and efficiency will enable you to use heavier weights in your next loading cycle thereby increasing total volume and the stimulus. So you are basically using 2 training styles periodized into a dual factor fatigue/volume manipulation scheme, one that fits your needs precisely and the other that allows for growth/recovery and potentiates your ability to progress more quickly the next time you hit the first phase again. So even if we rule out any size benefits (and they are significant) other than just a recovery effect for the intensity phase, it still makes a ton of sense to incorporate this style of training even when someone is only interested in size.

Now just talking randomly, if you want to extend the loading period you have to start fairly light and not let the weights climb too quickly (this works well for some and not so well for others and this can change over time as the level of general conditioning increases - you just don't know until you experiment and really the best experiment is the plain vanilla at first so you get a reference because most people using starndard BBing programs simply have zero reference for this). Still, once you reach the point of being really pushed you likely have somewhere between 10-21 days (most have 10-14, if you are truly loading and breaking records few humans can tolerate more than 2 weeks) before sliding from overreaching into overtraining which will lessen your net gains. Doing away with the intensity period all together, you could then deload for 1-2 weeks as needed (use the 2x per week method) and then begin lightly again.

So going through all of this - you still need a reference for your tolerances which should be the plain vanilla the first time because it's layed out so that it can't get screwed up too badly (and believe me - this program can get screwed up if people are allowed free reign and have never done anything like this - I'm just very vigilant about it), and in reality I don't think most people are going to net any more gains using something like this (meaning altering the periodization and neglecting the 2nd phase) although I can see some sense if a BBer is very very strong and is nearing a contest phase where his BF is very low and he doesn't want to burden his dryed joints with heavy triples. That said, the average is just that - an average. Most people want above average gains which means setting it up specifically for themselves, yet that can only be done as one gains experience and has a reference for how they responded and what they tolerated in the past.

Hope that helps.
 
Last edited:
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

"How Many Times Should I Hit a Muscle Each Week?"
-or-
Why A Body Part Split/Frequency Are Insufficient


So this was another response that I figured was worthwhile. Yes, I am lazy and I don't like retyping so I prefer to do it right once and be done with it. That way everyone gets the same thing and the poor shlep that comes along #20 in line doesn't get a half-assed version solely because I was too tired to do it again by that point.

Anyway, this is just an illustration on how totally useless a basic bodypart split is and why there's no real answer to how many times you should work a muscle in a week - it all depends on exactly what you are doing to it along with the body/system (volume and intenisty i.e. load) as well as how long you plan on maintaining that pace. Most intermediate/advanced trainees will benefit hugely from a periodized program where volume/intensity/frequency are regulated and varied over periods i.e. dual factor or fitness fatigue or whatever one chooses to call it. For beginners this isn't as important but understanding how these factors relate is still critical.

Source Thread is Here:
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?t=391562&page=1&pp=20



Madcow2 said:
would doing the muscle group twice a wk lead to "overtraining" ..whats up with the myth about doing a body part only once a week...

so say currently your doing this:

Mon: Chest
Tues: Back
Wed: Legs
Thurs: Shoulders
Friday: arms

And you start doing this:

Mon: Chest/back
Tues: legs/shoulders
Wed: arms
Thurs: off
Fri: chest/back
Sat: arms...

Damn im confused..how would you hit a body part twice but if you only took one day off??

Mon: Chest/back
Tues: Legs/shoulders
Wed: arms
Thurs: chest/back
FRi: Legs/shoulders
Sat: arms
Sun: rest??

do you believe if a body part is lagging you should hit it twice a week?
There's just so much more to it than organizing a split that determines which muscles on which days. Consider squatting 2 sets of 5 reps at 30% of your 1RM (so a 300lbs squatter doing roughly 100lbs). You could do this 5x per week indefinitely. Consider squatting 12 sets of 5 reps at 90% of your 1RM (so a 300max doing 270 now). Most people probably can't handle that more than once per week and even then will likely overtrain assuming a reasonable amount of other volume on other lifts being trained at reasonable intensity (overtraining has a lot more to do with the CNS and systemic recovery than it does with an individual muscle group).

Granted these are extremes but extreme scenarios serve to illustrate the point that frequency alone doesn't determine anything. When most people think about hitting a bodypart 2x per week what they basically end up doing is taking their existing workout and doing it twice in the same amount of time. So let's just say that they handle their existing workout okay - can they handle double the volume okay? I don't know, that's a damn big increase to pull on someone suddenly. A better way is to split your volume and distribute it using the frequency (so 6 sets of squats with working set weight becomes 3 sets 2x per week). Now a lot of people might find they can increase volume a bit because they become better conditioned with increased frequency and can tolerate more but it would be pretty dumb to start doing 6 sets 2x per week rather than 3 and double it up. Maybe increase by 1 set in each of the 2 workouts or some such other alteration, anything that's less severe than a 100% increase.

So the primary factors at play that determine the training load you are applying are volume, intensity (a given weight's % of your 1 rep max), and frequency (the allocation of volume/load). It's also important to realize that the idea that a muscle is trained, recovers fully and is enhanced, and then gets trained again in a similar process workout to workout is a really nice logical way of looking at things but not really how this stuff works. For a novice, it won't make any difference but as one progresses what were once nuances in training theory and not really important can really hurt or stop gains completely (plateau). This is actually the whole reason for periodization in training. You might check out the links under 'Dual Factor Theory - Why This Works' on this page: http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?t=375215
 
Last edited:
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Prilepin's Table

This is pretty highly prized in Westside training. There is some argument over its restrictiveness in allowing volume loading and how heavily it was relied upon by coaches (some people will say hugely, some actual former/current Soviet coaches will say not at all). Whatever, it's still a useful tool and at a minimum one can say that it has been implimented with unequivocally broad success in at least one training methodology- Westside and they aren't too shabby under even the most critical eye. So, there is some evidence that it shouldn't be completely ignored and might be useful enough to include here for those that are inclined and interested. There also seems to be some disagreement on how the guy spells his name - I've always seen Prilepin and that's what I'm sticking with.

Source: http://www.angelfire.com/pe/txpls/prilephin.html

By Tom McCullough MEd., MSS

Percent............Reps/Set............Optimal Total............Range
55-65.................3 - 6......................24..................18 - 30
70-75.................3 - 6......................18..................12 - 24
80-85.................2 - 4......................15..................10 - 20
> 90...................1 - 2.......................7...................4 - 10

Prilephin's table can be used as a tool to plan you next workout. This table takes advantage of both the maximal and dynamic effort methods of strength training. The reason we exercise using several methods is to vary the level of resistance so to cause differences in metabolic reactions, intramuscular coordination, and biomechanical variables. By training this way we enable ourselves to work intensely enough to bring about the optimal gains in strength.

When maximal weights are lifted the largest number of motor units are activated . Using the maximal effort method is thought to be best for training the muscles and CNS due to the great load place on them. Because of the high level of motivation needed to lift maximal weights, the lifter can easily become over trained. Therefore, only about 10% of our training cycle will be spent lifting maximal and supramaximal weights.

As we all are very aware, a good maximal lift is often determined by the amount of explosion we generate out of the hole. If the momentum is great enough, we will generate enough speed to get through our sticking point and be able to lock out the lift. Therefore, the dynamic effort method is very useful in training the explosive strength necessary for getting those new personal records. By training with intermediate loads, we are able to move the weights quickly, thus improving the rate of force development and explosive strength. Dynamic effort training is best done in the 55-82.5% range, with controlled eccentrics and very explosive concentric lifting. While the loads are intermediate in weight, maximal efforts should be used in moving the weights.

As for the repetition range, Prilephin found that a given percent can be optimally trained in the suggested repetitions per set range. Any less than this and you have not done enough work, any more and the bar speed slows too much. For example, if 55% is trained for 4 sets of 6 repetitions, the total repetitions done will be 24. We are well within our optimal total repetition range. Let's look at another example, 55% is trained for 8 sets of 3 repetitions. The total work done is still 24, with is still within our optimal repetition range. So we can see how versatile this table can be.
 
Last edited:
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

The Deadlift & Recovery
(Increasing the Deadlift Without Deadlifting Take 2)


Some good info to ponder below along with some very solid links. Pulling from the floor is fundemental to developing the body (like squatting and pressing the latter of which isn't nearly as effective despite it's popularity as the primary mass builder in the US - and people wonder why they struggle to get big). The deadlift only provides a lifter with a single option and it is the most taxing one of all. The Olympic Lifts and their varriants address many of the concerns around this.

Source Thread: http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?t=391851&page=2

Madcow2 said:
I'll second that. The deadlift is the maximum pull that the body can muster. As a lifter progresses one finds that it becomes very very taxing on the body's recuperative ability (CNS is included in this) - there is a big reason why Westside's Elite lifters avoid training the lift frequently. If you are going to pull heavy once a week and do some light pulls on another day you might get away with it.

There is a good program that has you deadlift 3x per week (Korte's 3x3) but also figure that it includes absolutely no assistance work and all you do is bench, squat, and dead every day 3x per week for around 8 weeks. If your max is somewhat respectable this program is a nightmare because you always have to pull last before you leave the gym. You can find Korte's write ups along with a lot of Louie's (WSB) in the Deepsquatter archives here: http://www.deepsquatter.com/strength/archives/index.htm

Anyway, the point being is that you had better either be a beginner or you'll have to manage this very carefully if you intend to deadlift 2x per week. This is actually a really good reason to learn the olympic lifts (or even just clean and snatch pull variants) because it gives you a ton of possible pulling variants that are for the most part concentric only, far less taxing, and have a very solid carry over to the dead. Louie (WSB) tends to steer clear of them but this has never made sense to me as the same article that talked about the carry-over from the goodmorning listed the power clean, high pull, and power shrug along with it - it was written by Bill Starr BTW after he set a DL record without training it explicitly - he was an OL. With OLs you can pull mutliple times per week, acceleration is implicit, and you can redistribute your recovery away toward other lifts. Steering clear of the whole "teaching" argument by using clean/snatch pull style varriants this is pretty logical to me and it's probably the only thing that irks me about Westside. For those who are unfamiliar with their own excellent assistance routines and good-morning implementation it's well worth the time to become aquainted.

Here's the original Starr article: http://www.americanpowerliftevolution.net/New Folder 1969/dlapproach1.html

Here's someone who recently did an OL assist program which lead him to a PR in the dead without training it. Do notice the only issues he encountered were with locking out the much heavier weight than he was accustomed to, but also notice the one exercise he neglected was the dynamic shrugging (power shrug) which specifically overloads the top portion to supplment this:
http://www.ruggedmag.com/index.php?type=Article&i=15&a=9

Interesting stuff anyway. Good tools to have in the arsenal as the deadlift didn't earn the title as the "ultimate test of full body strength" by being easy to recover from so train smart and use each tool to the best of your abilities.
 
Last edited:
madcow, so lets suppose I do this 5x5:

Mon......Volume Phase...........................................De load/Intensity Phase
Squat.......5x5................................... ..............................3x3
Bench.......1x5................................... ..............................1x3
Row.........1x5................................... ...............................1x3

Wed......Volume Phase...........................................De load/Intensity Phase
Squat.......5x5 with 15-20% less than Monday.................drop this lift
Deadlift.....5x5.................................. ...............................3x3
Military......5x5................................. ................................3x3
Pullups.......5x5................................. ...............................3x3

Fri.........Volume Phase...........................................De load/Intensity Phase
Squat........1x5.................................. ..............................1x3
Bench........5x5.................................. .............................3x3
Row...........5x5................................. ..............................3x3


now on monday and fridays workouts, lets say I do six sets of accesory work, something like this: (*purpose is for aestethic purposes*)

monday:
-2sets of barbell curls
-2sets of dips
-2sets of calves

friday:
-2sets of laterals
-2sets of bent overlaterals
-2sets of lying tricep extensions

all of the exercises done for 12 reps. would that lead to overtraining? I can't see how it would because 12 rep weight isn't that stimulating on the CNS compared to 3-5 rep lifts. I have a hard time getting out of the bodybuilder mindset, I know. :O
 
No dips. That's adding a compound exercise and you are already pressing 3x a week. The rest are fine. Train them to a pump or to failure if you choose but not to a "psyched" failure. No emotional arrousal as this will independently tax the CNS outside of the exercise itself.

To be honest the whole loading/volume phase is overtraining to a degree - in 4 weeks you will come right to the edge of overtraining. If you ran it for 6-8 weeks straight with a series of weeks very close to your max 1x5 and 5x5 weights, it would most likely plunge you into a severe deficit and require 3-4 weeks to be able to lift decently again (I did this once as an experiement). If people mis-set their weights and don't start somewhat conservatively they can also run into this issue - and this is without any assistance work whatsoever.

Given that the base program can already be so taxing if not properly run, this is why I don't like anyone adding additional work beyond some basic anciliaries and certainly no more compound lifts. I won't give you my opinion on laterals suffice to say they shouldn't hurt you in that volume.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

harhar said:
can the bench be replaced with dips?

Absolutely not - unless there is some injury but the absolute bottom line is that you will sacrifice gains in your lifts and muscle. You should read the very top post on this page. There is a subsection on Exercise Substitution. The first words are "Don't fuck with this." There's some fairly humorous stuff in there along with what is and isn't acceptable. The bottom line is that 99% of the changes people want to make will either hurt the program or simply waste time. So if one is injured and it's the best one can do, that's fine but if I let everyone change it around at will, no one would be getting good gains and instead of hearing "This program really worked for me" they'd be saying "Yeah, I tried that but I went back to what I was doing before and it worked better." Check out the Exercise Subsitution section though - http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4764723&postcount=381
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Single Rep Maximum Equations and Rep Estimates

Since some people have asked here's a few ways you can do it. You can easily adapt these equations into an Excel spreadsheet. Calculators can also be found here:
http://www.brianmac.demon.co.uk/maxload.htm (equation source)
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/1rm.htm

The only real value added by me is some basic algebra but at least it's here for reference. Of course, an understanding of order of operations in math is kind of essential for using the equations below (just working from inside the nests of brackets, deepest first should be fine). Otherwise, just rely on the tools above.

Brzycki's equation to determine Max load

(not recommended if your estimate is based on more reps than around 10)

The Brzycki equation is as follows:

1RM = Weight ÷ ( 1.0278 - ( 0.0278 × Number of repetitions ) )

From there you can:

1) Calculate intensity for whatever percentage of your 1RM you deem appropriate

2) Reverse the formula to back out your maximum weight with any number of reps:

Weight = 1RM X ( 1.0278 - ( 0.0278 × Desired number of repetitions ) )



An alternative equation to determine Max load

The alternative equation is as follows:

1RM = Weight × ( 1 + ( 0.033 × Number of repetitions ) )

The corresponding reversed equation is:

Weight = 1RM ÷ ( 1 + ( 0.033 × Desired number of repetitions ) )
 
Last edited:
Just finished up the week working out MWF. I have a question, my split has to change now to tues thurs and sat, so instead of the normal 2 days off then working out again on monday, do i take an extra day off, or work out sunday tues thurs and sat just to get the split going, then maintain tues, thurs, sat?
 
I've been going to the gym for about 7.5 months now and Im thinking of starting a single factor beginner program. Just a few questions though.

Can I add pull ups to the three days? Would ab work on Mon and Fri affect me negatively? Do I need to do incline bench or can this be replaced with an overhead press? And one more thing, how long should I be on the single factor program before moving onto the dual factor?
 
You can add pullups to the Wednesday workout. I believe the program specifically calls for ab and core work on M/W. You can do it whenever, timing is not so important as long as it is not directly before the weights. You can swap out incline for standing military or push presses.

-I'll just add - deadlifts are not touch and go. Each rep is fully deweighted upon the floor before you pull again (you don't need to let go or do a major reset but that bar comes to a complete unsupported rest on the ground). Squats are full range olympic style. You go as low as your body will take you.

As far as length of time, do it until you aren't making progress anymore. You might also do it for a period and then lift light for 2 weeks or so (2x per week, lower volume) to recover a bit and then step back into it again. Here is another thread that illustrates a squatting program that carries lifters between 1-2 years before they begin the dual factor version of the program. Might be a good frame of reference: http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4658227&postcount=235
 
Hi Madcow2.

You say that Force=Mass*Acceleration.

Some days ago, i got a newsletter from AST.

Is strict form restricting your
muscle gains?

by Skip La Cour
2x Team Universe Overall Champion
5x Team Universe Heavyweight Champion


What is your definition of “form”?

Think about that question for a moment. How you perceive the meaning of form can make the difference between mediocre gains over the years—and packing-on the most thick, rock-hard muscle possible in the shortest period of time.

Form means using technique during an exercise to effectively stimulate the muscle for growth. It does not mean rigid, deliberate exercise execution. Overloading the targeted muscle group stimulates maximum growth—not strict form.

Yes, I realize that the textbooks, personal trainers, and the “know-it-alls” in your gym always cram the importance of strict form down your throat.

But, what is your real goal? To train in a manner that everyone in your gym will accept? Or, train in a way that packs on muscle faster? Focus on what produces results—not just the methods that are supposed to get you those results.

Think about it. The safest, most conservative advice when it comes to training that anyone could give you would be to “always use strict form.”

But I’m telling you that advice will not maximize your potential to build the most muscle in the shortest period of time.

Let’s say that you were a runner striving to be your very best and I was your doctor. You came to me complaining that your knees hurt when you ran. The safest, most-widely accepted recommendation I could give you would be to stop running for awhile, wouldn’t it?

How could I go wrong with that advice? I couldn’t. But would you be able to maximize your running potential in the shortest period of time? Who knows for sure? You aren’t even trying to get the most out of what ability you do have.

Have you ever noticed that some of the most successful, dedicated, and hardest working bodybuilders in the world use what some would call “less-than-perfect” form?

The best bodybuilders in the world have gone beyond conventional thinking and have discovered that overloading the targeted muscle group stimulates maximum growth—not strict form.


Now, the question to you. Should i use the cheated flattery form with the full speed, or should the full speed only be used at good technique? I especially want to know it regarding the JSROWs. They are done in a way where the technique can be easily destroyed-
 
1) The JSRows are perfectly safe. The issue, I guess, is in someone implementing the technique over the internet, missing something, and training it very hard and very heavy (a la 5x5) right away without any type of accomodation. My new description of this program (first post at the top of this page) has an item titles "common sense" under a section called "The Lifts". If someone is unfamiliar with a variant of these lifts, they simply can't jump in and expect to perform at 100% within 2 weeks. It's unsafe. Some people who's technique is probably already similar (i.e. 90 degrees) and who do a lot of heavy rowing might not have an issue but I think this is where it stems from. The lift itself is safe like any free weight motion, the issue of injury comes in the implementation and I think a few people have pushed it too hard too fast. Acceleration in the row itself is not unsafe because it is smooth acceleration without any jerking. Get the weight moving and continue to move it faster and faster. You don't jerk it off the ground.

2) So first, I'm talking about acceleration as it pertains to the concentric phase of a rep. F=M*A is just a basic physics 101 equation. It also assumes constant technique as technique alterations will change the way a weight loads on the body's muscles and joints. Skip is right in that you can't always use 100% picture perfect form - i.e. a record triple will generally have less than 100% technique on the final rep as support muscles and primary movers begin to fatique (otherwise you could get another). I'm not talking about dogshit unsafe form but less than 100% perfect. This really doesn't have much to do with F = M * A simply because a constant is assumed there. When using maximum intensity (i.e. a rep in the 95%-100% range) maximum acceleration still yeilds a pretty slow rep. Acceleration is much more of a factor in weights < 80-85% range and this tends to be where most people train with volume at least for a good portion of the period as weights above that are very taxing on the CNS so you have to be somewhat careful on applying too many of them.

One other thing is don't read to much into BBing literature. Most of what is written for BBers is either common sense or totally wrong. I mean, no offense to Skip, but fatigue on hard sets and form dropping below 100% - I'd have never thought it worth putting down on paper let alone printing up in an article. There's a link in the table of contents of this thread that has good sources of knowledge, books, etc... Definitely a far better place to glean training advice from.
 
Top Bottom