posted February 29, 2000 10:24 AM            

LAte

Lobo

posted March 02, 2000 04:55 PM            

One thing off the bat is that GH is not a prohormone. It is growth hormone. It is very effective for building muscle, as well as growing every other body part, i.e. organs, hands, feet, etc.

The norAndrosteDerm might be the only product that may actually have some positive effect. It's the white thick liquid that you rub on and is absorbed right? I used the androstederm when it first came out and did not see to much results - if any. And the price was steep too.

My main point on the whole prohormon deal is that you can get sides from them without getting a whole lot of gains. They cost way to much. And when you compare a six week cycle of anavar (with next to zero sides) to the price of the prohormones, why would you chance it. The prohormones must be converted to test before they are used - that's how they get past the current laws. Hell, mens bodies are not even good at converting the stuff, and I doubt women are any better. Although I must admit I do not have the facts in front of me, something along the line of only converting like 20% of the stuff.... And danm if I remember the converion process. Also, test is not always a good thing for women. If it were, then we would be seeing a lot more threads on the use of T200 and Sust250 (which btw, I have a info on a lady who is currently using it... will be interesting!)

So I guess it is up to the individual and how each responds, but for anyone asking my .02, spend your cash on the anavar, get your solid gains and keep your hair, voice, and other women attributes intact!

LAte

Lobo