SteelWeaver
New member
One will skim almost anything when not in the mood to study, and "The Eat Right Diet" book was lying around the kitchen ...
Brief summary: diferent bood groups evolved through different periods in the history of the earth, O being the oldest, A next, B next and AB the newest. Thus, their metabolisms etc, etc have evolved differently, and thus, they thrive on different types of diets - the O's being good on hunter-gatherer type diets - lots of protien, veggies, fruits, not much in the way of grains, A's good on "cultivator" diets - good at being vegetarians etc, etc, etc - you get the picture. One of the key things the author (Dr P D'Amamo) refers to, though, is the way the bodies of people of different blood groups react to lectins (one of which, interestingly, is ricin, the recently popularised highly toxic poison made from castor beans).
He also goes into a fair amount of detail on other immune responses to various substances, real and so-called allergies, and has lots and lots of references at the back of his book, none of which I've checked out yet, because I just picked up this book today.
My question is: can there possibly be any scientific basis for even bothering to experiment with the proposed food choices he makes, or is the blood type diet about as scientific as the blood type personality profiling that is popular in Japan?
I like to remain open-minded about things, and to be fair, most of his sugggestions are what we here already know - eat fresh whole, natural, unprocessed, preferably organic/free range, etc foods, with large servings of fresh veggies, avoiding condiments, too much caffeine and so on. But he is very specific in his choices for each group.
So, anyone have any ideas? Opinions? Facts? Research?
I'm also interested to find out what people on this board have found for themselves in terms of what works for them, and if this has any correlation to the doctor's claims. (JJ? )
Brief summary: diferent bood groups evolved through different periods in the history of the earth, O being the oldest, A next, B next and AB the newest. Thus, their metabolisms etc, etc have evolved differently, and thus, they thrive on different types of diets - the O's being good on hunter-gatherer type diets - lots of protien, veggies, fruits, not much in the way of grains, A's good on "cultivator" diets - good at being vegetarians etc, etc, etc - you get the picture. One of the key things the author (Dr P D'Amamo) refers to, though, is the way the bodies of people of different blood groups react to lectins (one of which, interestingly, is ricin, the recently popularised highly toxic poison made from castor beans).
He also goes into a fair amount of detail on other immune responses to various substances, real and so-called allergies, and has lots and lots of references at the back of his book, none of which I've checked out yet, because I just picked up this book today.
My question is: can there possibly be any scientific basis for even bothering to experiment with the proposed food choices he makes, or is the blood type diet about as scientific as the blood type personality profiling that is popular in Japan?
I like to remain open-minded about things, and to be fair, most of his sugggestions are what we here already know - eat fresh whole, natural, unprocessed, preferably organic/free range, etc foods, with large servings of fresh veggies, avoiding condiments, too much caffeine and so on. But he is very specific in his choices for each group.
So, anyone have any ideas? Opinions? Facts? Research?
I'm also interested to find out what people on this board have found for themselves in terms of what works for them, and if this has any correlation to the doctor's claims. (JJ? )