Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Research Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsResearch Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic

Vertical Leap training thread

Jump Squats

Good dialogue on Jump Squats I found searching through archives of a Thrower list

--------------------------
Ken Sprague
11:10 PST, 08/05/2000

Jeff,
I had Chris use sand-filled innertubes draped across the shoulders for resistance during squat jumps. I also had him doing ballistic push-ups with a sand bag perched on his upper back (you need a spotter for this one).

The key reason the jumps and ballistic push-ups have such a positive effect for the thrower is that they allow acceleration (w/ resistance) throughout the movement as the body leaves the floor. Conversely, w/ the equivalent barbell movements of squats and bench presses, the body/bar decelerates toward the end of the movement.

Although I've referred to them as resistance plyos, and there is certainly a plyo effect on landing followed by immediate concentric movement, I think the acceleration (through the concentric movement is the most beneficial aspect of the exercises.

In general, the "resistance plyos" are analogous to training like you compete--acceleration through the movement. [A good practical example of the results of this type training is Chris: he threw the 12#/16# shots approximately 68'/60' feet at the end of his high school senior season when able to bench press only 235#. But, the accelration training in the weight room precipitated his acceleration in the ring.]

-------------------------------------------

Andy Bloom
16:13 PST, 10/18/2000

Ken, I must respectfully disagree with your suggestion to fieldboy that you would choose jump squats if you only had to choose one form of squating to do. My reasoning is two-fold.

First, I did a full year of jump squats leading up to the '98 season. My improvement in jumping ability was incredible and I did throw farther, but I totally fried my electrical system. By the end of the season I was throwing two to three meters less in the discus and one meter less in the shot than I had hit early in the year. I had no leg explosiveness left and couldn't jump worth anything. The primary lesson that I learned was that there is a time and place for all styles of training. Since then I have used conventional power lifting early in the year to develop a good base and then made a slow transition over the course of the indoor and outdoor season to all jump squats. The result has been two straight years of PRs in my final competition of the year. This year I managed to keep my explosiveness despite a major injury. The other thing I have noticed is that doing exclusively jump squats does not help my discus as much as my shot put. This leads me to my second problem.

As far as I remember, fieldboy is a young discus thrower who also toys with the shot put. As a young athlete I don't think he should be subjecting his body to the rigors of jump squating. When I spent my year doing jump squats I was already a 700+ pound squatter, had a 400 pound power clean and a 37 inch vertical and 10'6" standing long jump. That is to say that I was already a developed athlete who needed to find something to take me to the next level so I decided to shock my system. There is no way that fieldboy is developed to this point, not to mention the fact that his core strength cannot be good enough to withstand the forces of jump squatting. I would also worry about subjecting a young high school athlete, who's growth plates have not fully closed, to those type of jarring movements. I don't know what the effect would be. I know you did these things for your son and he did well with it, but from what I understand, your son is built a good bit like me and can handle the loads you put on him. I wonder if fieldboy is built the same and what his history is.

Fieldboy, my answer to your question would be to do regular squats to just below parallel and add some light plyometric exercises.
-----------------------------------------------

Andy Bloom
15:07 PST, 10/19/2000

I started the year with 400 pounds for 3x12. this was at a time when i was doing 550 for 3x12 in a normal squat. I began the year with what i called explosive squats where i didn't actually break contact with the ground. I didn't break contact until I got down to sets of 6. My best that year was 575 x 3.

At the end of the year my jumps were 40 (VJ) and 11'8 (SLJ)

-----------------------------------------------
Ken Sprague
16:16 PST, 10/18/2000


Andy,
Thanks much for your post. I want to expand on my recommendations for jump squats--as a respectful rebuttal to your post. I would love to be sitting eye to eye with you during the discussion; but it's always great "talking" w/ you whether in person or at a great distance.

First, you noted that your "improvement in jumping ability was incredible and I did throw farther" after a year of jump squats. You go on to say that "by the end of the season" you were throwing 1 meter less, that you had "couldn't jump worth anything." In summation, squat jumps built tremendous explosive as evidenced by your jump, but then you lost it.

Putting those two facts together, could it not be the case that you were overtraining--too great a frequency or volume of jump squats?

I want to make a point here: acceleration training is subject to overtraining just as any other athletic activity.

Incidentally, just like strength, acceleration can be lost for one of two obvious reasons. One is overtraining; the second, quite naturally, is undertraining. Stop strength training and your strength will drop: Stop acceleration training, and the capacity to accelerate will diminish.

I'm happy that you still highly value jump squats as you noted making "a slow transition over the course of the indoor and outdoor season to all jump squats."

I flatly disagree about your assumption that any special power base needs to be developed before jump squats are added to the training routine.

As long as progressive resistance [the old stand-by] is followed, jump squats are as appropriate as standard squats.

For example, I had a group of girls--who had never lifted before--start jumps squats on day-one of training. The first weeks were w/ bodyweight, then a 20# sandbag, thereafter 30#, and up and up as the physical capacity adapted to the commensurate progressive resistance. No problems; the erectors, thighs, hips, spinal stabilizers, shoulder girdle, etc. have progressively adapted to the ever heavier loads. [They are having a similar experience to your improved jump--one is jumping approximately one foot higher, all are markedly improved.] Throws are continuously improving. The key is progressive resistance, just as would be the case for a novice squatter. Incidentally, Chris was doing squat jumps (as a ten-year-old) years before he performed a standard squat.

Two notes which weren't directly addressed in your post: first, the intensity (and protein degradation) of jump squats mandates infrequent workouts--once every 7 - 10 days; second, in my opinion, they should never be performed w/ a barbell--that's just asking for trauma. The bar often localizes the forces on the spine--the sand bag spreads the force making the lift actually comfortable on the shoulders.

One more point: the resistance of the sand bag isn't going to allow the beghinner or intermediate lifter get far off the ground; hence, there isn't going to be much force on landing. I suspect there would likely be more force generated on landing from shooting a lay-up---because of the drop from a greater height.

I continue to recommend the jump squat for any athlete wanting to increase explosiveness.

Always your friend,

Ken


Ken Sprague
17:23 PST, 10/19/2000


Todd,
First, I'm going to ask a question before answering yours. Have you ever tried an "easy squat" bar? I ask because I avoided the easy squat bar for many years, out of habit I guess. But I was an instant convert after my first trial run. I push the easy squat bar because it's perfect for self-assisted reps--and the athlete has the advantage of a generally natural movement. The design also places relatively more stress on the legs than the back--an important factor when using >1RM weights.

I don't have any experience doing assisted squats on a Smith machine. I don't know first hand how that might work in practice. The Smith machine is great for assisted incline presses--but that doesn't help you since you need a spotter (to assist) for that movement. If you try the Smith machine for self-assisted squats, please let me know how the experience turns out.

As for squat jumps with dumbbells, they're better than no squat jumps at all. The problem w/ dumbbells: the athlete tends to jump with unnaturally upright posture. [Try squat jumping w/out any resistance and follow that w/ jumps using dumbbells (or holding a plate)--you'll immediately appreciate the difference in form.] A natural jumping posture--which is not inhibited by a sandbag on the shoulders--is more dynamic, working the erectors into the movement to a greater degree. The natural jumping posture can be accomplished w/ a sandbag or vest.

There is one more major concern w/ dumbbells--imagine the problem when you work up to jumping w/ very heavy dumbbells. Conversely, imagine the relative ease of having an equivalent weight in sand spread across your shoulders and traps.

I know this response isn't the most concrete advice--you're going to have to experiment, perhaps to find an intermediate approach, given the limits of the garage and training alone.

I would heartily recommend that you at least try one 50# sand-filled innertube--you can snatch it over your shoulders and toss it into a corner when finished.

Ken

-----------------------------------------------

Ken Sprague
19:08 PST, 10/19/2000


Coach K,
Your post of 16:54 (10/18/00) is very interesting!

Your assumption is absolutely correct: "the greatest benefit...[of] jump squats [is] the muscle fiber recruitment that goes on in explosive, upward drive of the lift." The training benefit is improved explosive extension and thrust of the legs, hips, and erectors.

You go on to ask an interesting and complex question (hopefully I'm correct in my condensation): As a supplement to standard squats, which is safer, squat jumps or "intense" plyometrics (hopping stadium stairs, depth jumps, etc)?

Although I've trained many athletes (males/females/adults/children), I've never observed a single injury during squat jumps. Keep in mind that I won't use anything but sand bags as resistance.

On the other hand, I have observed many injuries during traditional "intense" plyometric exercises--particularly among larger, male athletes such as football linemen and throwers.

I think the difference is the generally controlled two-leg landing of the squat jumps as compared to the often unbalanced landing of many plyometric movements; and, the landing forces of squat jumps are much less than would be the case as in some plyometrics such as depth jumps.

[Note, however, there is a true plyometric effect on landing-and-subsequent-extension during squat jumps. But, the generally controlled movement makes the effect less risky to attain.]

The last point of your post questions the potential for longterm detrimental effects to the spine and growth plates of younger, developing athletes?

Frankly, I doubt there is an inappropriate risk to the younger athlete in performing jump squats. Calculating forces at landing, there is less force on the spine and growth plates during a jump squat than during a typical two-legged landing from a lay-up--the relative height of the drop from the highest point of the respective jumps is the telling factor. [This comparison calculates even w/ unreasonable resistance on the shoulders.] Of course, imagine the forces when landing on one leg--and basketball players keep growing taller.

Incidentally, hopscotch is a great kindergarten plyometric--not many kids are hurt from the activity.

One more random thought: the growth plate scare kept younger athletes from participating in regular weight training activities a generation ago. I hope that scare doesn't find renewed life w/ squat jumps--or hopscotch. Yes, proceed cautiously w/ progressive resistance, but the tens-of-minutes per week of squat jumps won't harm growth plates.

I hope this adds to the dialogue.

Ken
 
One more point: the resistance of the sand bag isn't going to allow the beghinner or intermediate lifter get far off the ground; hence, there isn't going to be much force on landing. I suspect there would likely be more force generated on landing from shooting a lay-up---because of the drop from a greater height.

I continue to recommend the jump squat for any athlete wanting to increase explosiveness.

i totally disagree with this. the equation for force is f=ma.
hes adding mass and decreasing acceleration. the force is still the same.
 
he's talking about eccentric landing forces

a hammer dropped on your head from one inch doesn't hurt that much, from 50m it will kill ;)
 
ya so he is saying that with less weight you get higher. so more acceleration.

with more mass you have less acceleration. but they balance eachother out dont they? since everything falls at 9.8m/s^2.
correct me if im wrong.
 
No, impact forces are greater when you fall from a higher distance.

drop down from 6 inches with 135lbs on your back, not too bad. drop from 3 feet with bodyweight - feels lot harder on your body.
 
yes that is true.
but if you do the calculations. the force would end up being the same.
if the athlete puts out the same amount of power for each jump squat (with weight and with out) the force will be the same.
 
your talking about the force require to propel the body into the air, I'm talking about landing/impact forces! :)


Yes and no in your case, the brain doesn't work in a linear fashion. Putting a weight on shoulders will make jump differently, most probbaly harder. It is overload to the msucles and tendons, more stretch reflex potential when you squat down before jumping.

In the same way that one can squat more by adding weight on the bar, the same thing applies with jump squats, over time you will generate more force with overload vs just jumping with bodyweight.
 
lol i think there is some miss communication. i am talkin about the force when hitting the ground. like i said the equation for force is

force=mass x acceleration

if you increase the mass you dont go as high (less acceleration) the force of the landing is still the same if the acceleration is higher and the weight is lower(less mass).

this is true only if the power of the athlete it consistent.
 
Top Bottom