Training for fiber type is false

[Cuthbert]

This stuff is irrelevant. All of the strong people I know (and I know quite a few) pay NO attention to training for fiber types, etc. I'm not saying it's true or false, but you probably don't need to concern yourself with it.

 

[Dave949]

The only thing that REALLY works...is what YOU can get to work for YOU.B True

Hallelujah !!!

Pump on .....

 

[BOOEY]

Scientific tests also show Cell-tech is 1887% better than regular creatine. So it must be true, right?!

Regardless of the subject, tests can easily be manipulated, biased, and in most cases, methodically innaccurate. I base most of my beliefs on what I see from my own progress and from evaluating others' progress.

 

[anthrax]

No one had anything to say about this, huh?

This is theory

You don't train to stimulate any specific type of fiber but to build mass/gain strength, no ?

 

[Debaser]

So what should we take as truth, then, anecdote?

 

[wnt2bBeast]

The only thing that REALLY works...is what YOU can get to work for YOU.

All this science is worthless unless you can make it work for you.

B True

A f'ing men!!!! For me strength=size..so training more like a powerlifter is working for me now..Who gives a shit!!! If your doing 1 set with 20 reps and growing then who am i to say ur doing it wrong go with it until u stop making gains..I agree with booey as well for every test result u cn find another test that disproves what the first one proved??lol so i suggest you try different things and see what works for you..

 

[LeanMeanHockeyMachine]

Smashing good read Tom, thanks for posting that.

 

[dzulboy]

Scientific tests also show Cell-tech is 1887% better than regular creatine. So it must be true, right?!

Regardless of the subject, tests can easily be manipulated, biased, and in most cases, methodically innaccurate. I base most of my beliefs on what I see from my own progress and from evaluating others' progress.

you mean its not WTF