Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Research Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsResearch Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic

Read this to find out WHY MUSCLE GROWS! Important! SHOCKERS INSIDE!

S

SSAlexSS

Guest
I found a cool text file at:
http://staff.washington.edu/griffin/muscle_growth.txt

It is about research on muscle building... and it is shocking!!!

Examples (if you dont want to read entire article):
- 3 sets are the best
- Movement should be fast (real shocker for me)
-include 10rep max atleast once (10 rep range supposedly builds lots of muscle).
-Train muscle up to 3 times per week (novices can train one muscle 5x per week... I did that and gained 20 pounds!!!)

- training when muscles are 'sore' may help speed recovery and is recommended - however you should not train to the point of causing 'pain' (or if you are already in 'pain')


THE BEST WAY TO TRAIN FOR SIZE

by Walter Eddy

Many bodybuilders know less about 'weight training' than Medical rehab
personal and Professional Sport Coaches. Ironic? - yes, after all -
bodybuilding is weightlifting. Yet bodybuilders tend to seek out
information from anyone who promises to make them big, tell them the
secret on how to get big like the Pro bodybuilders - when the only secret
is that steroids are the ONLY way to get that kinda big.

So what do Pro Sport Coaches and Med. rehab people know that you may not -
that's what is about to be covered, so pay attention if you want to know
the truth - go elsewhere if you're looking for a bunch of golden promises.

Very little money has been spent on 'bodybuilding' research. On the other
hand millions have been spent on ways to improve the performance of Pro
and 'Olympic' athletes. Not to mention the years of research put into
studying muscle rehabilitation for medical purposes. It is from these
sources that the real information on getting 'big' (as big as is possible
with or without steroids), can be found. The information is out there, you
just have to look for it - the important facts to you, the bodybuilder,
will be covered in this article.

Training/growth facts - what the studies prove.

The goal of every bodybuilder is to get bigger muscles. With this goal in
mind lets cover what research has taught us - and how to put it to use .

FIRST: Muscle strength in the adult human is relative to cross section
area (size). An equal cross-sectional area of muscle from any average
trained women or man has about the same 'strength' (i.e.: can generate the
same amount of force, 6 kg - cm2), there is very little variation. To put
it another way, generally speaking - all human muscle tissue has (about)
the same amount of strength, or is able to generate the same amount of
force. So the greater the size, cross-sectional, the greater the strength.
However, it is important to point out that bone structure, muscle
attachments, neural factors, etc., play a very important part in
performing 'feats of strength', so two people with equal cross section
areas of muscle may still perform very differently -- not due to stronger
muscle tissue, but due to other factors.

What does this mean to the bodybuilder - it means that if you wish to
increase muscle mass you must train the muscle to be able to generate more
force - which in turn means the muscle must grow. Don't confuse
increasing muscle size with increasing performance strength - performance
strength - for example the amount of weight a person can bench press -
depends on a number of factors - neural factors being very important.
Increasing muscle size will help increase performance strength -- but
increasing performance strength does not necessarily mean that you will
increase muscle size. That may sound confusing - re-read the paragraph
before this one again if you still do not understand.

Putting this information to use. To increase muscle size (or mass), you
must increase the cross sectional area. Because there is a limit to the
amount of force (strength) a set cross-sectional area of muscle can
generate -muscle tissue must increase in size (cross-sectional area) to be
able to handle a greater force (to become 'stronger') - the result: bigger
muscles. So the best way to make your muscle bigger - - train in such a
way as to increase the amount of force you can generate - and, of course,
to make the muscle grow as fast as possible. This last statement 'as fast
as possible' is another key term - most types of resistance training will
cause your muscles to grow, the question you should be asking is, is this
the fastest way? You will find the best answers research has to offer
here.

Applying this information to your training.

This is where powerlifters, bodybuilders and endurance athletes part ways.
The goal of an endurance athlete is not to increase muscle mass - the goal
of a powerlifter is to be able to generate as much power as possible - the
goal of a bodybuilder is to increase muscle size as much as possible. Some
training principals apply to all three, but there are also some
significant differences. What will be covered here is the best way to get
'big'.

SIDE NOTE: The untrained muscle responds much better than the trained
muscle. This simply means that the untrained person will experience much
faster gains in strength and growth than the person who has several months
of GOOD training under there belt. This is a well known fact - not
someone's opinion.

TRAINING FOR GROWTH

First - be sure NOT to skip the above material - the above facts play an
important part in understanding how to train correctly for growth.

Different types of exercises will not be covered here - why? - the type of
exercise you do (i.e.: push-ups, sit-ups, presses, curls, etc.) have
nothing to do with growth - - they determine which muscle(s) receive the
stimulation. The 'method' you use is what will cause your muscle to become
bigger, stronger, faster, etc.. Let's make sure this is clear, as many
people do not understand this, and it is an important point - it is HOW
you train - NOT the exercise itself - - that cause muscles to grow.

Research on muscle recovery for medical reasons has been done for hundreds
of years now - that's correct - 100's. Research was greatly stepped up
after World War 2 - it was at this time that the benefits of resistance
training began to be understood. Over the last 20 years the benefits of
resistance training have been greatly accepted and researched. Over the
last few years new types of testing methods - and computers - have come a
long way in finding the best - and fastest - way to 'build' muscle. Why is
this important to people other than bodybuilders? - in the Medical
community the information is considered important so that patients in
rehabilitation may recover as quickly as possible. In sports it is
important because it is now known that resistance training can enhance all
types of performance. This is where the research is being done - and why.
Bodybuilders are still on the bottom of the list - but are still included
in some studies - not to help 'bodybuilders' - but to gain more
understanding of muscle growth.

So what does research tell us - some of this you may know - some may
surprise you. PRE - or Progressive Resistance training - is considered the
best method of training for size. Before you say 'big deal' read on - PRE
has changed much over the years. It was first started by DeLorme, T.L.
who did the research on it (Restoration of muscle power by
heavy-resistance exercise. J. Bone Joint Surg. 27:645,1945). Many of the
principles still hold true - but many refinements have been made as well.

THE BEST WAY TO TRAIN FOR SIZE - WHAT RESEARCH HAS SHOWN

SETS

2 sets (of maximum effort), are far more effective that 1 (fastest
increases in growth and strength), and it appears that 3 sets are slightly
more beneficial than doing 2. There is no evidence that doing more that 3
sets will help - or hurt. Rest between sets should be at least 1 min. and
no more than 5 min. - no difference has been shown between taking a 1 min.
or 5 min. rest - in terms of growth and strength increases - the choice is
yours. All sets should be done to the point where another rep is not
possible. (Warm up sets should be done first).

REPS

Reps ranging from 3 to 12 are all considered good variations - this is not
news to anyone - however this may be - it appears to be important to do at
least one set of 10 RM each session. (I'm not going to go into details on
this - this is what studies have concluded - take it or leave it). For
those who do not understand - this means that you should do one set with
enough weight so that you are only capable of doing 10 reps. You may mix
up the sequence any way you like, examples: 3-6-10; 12-11-10; 3-10-12;
10-10-10. Any combination is acceptable - just do 1 set of 10 RM each
time. (Side note: I myself am not exactly clear on the point of doing one
set of 10 each session but shall continue to research this point - I
believe that it may be important as a 'control' as much as any other
factor.)

PROGRESSIVE

The progressive part of PRE means that it is very important to increase
your 'load' on a weekly basis. Your 10 RM is the control. You must
increase the amount of weight you use for your 10 RM each week by at least
a small amount

SPEED

Shocker number two - it has been shown that fast movements (contractions),
produce the greatest increases in strength and growth. This really should
not come as a surprise. The speed of movement when lifting a weight that
you are only capable of doing 10 reps with, even performing the reps as
fast as possible with good form, is still very slow compared to many
sports movements - such as swinging a bat, throwing a ball, running - etc.
The concentric part of the movement should be done as fast as possible -
however this does not mean to 'jerk' the weight - it is also very
important that the movement be done in a 'smooth' manner. This is
important - 'jerking' the weight may cause an increase in strength due to
neural factors - but it is not the best way to increase muscle size.

FREQUENCY

Benefits from PRE can be achieved by training a muscle(s) as little as
once a week. The best results for the TRAINED individual APPEAR to be
training a muscle no more than 3 times a week, HOWEVER THIS IS NOT
CONCLUSIVE - it is possible that training more or less may have a SMALL
advantage - the new trainer can get best results training a muscle up to 5
times a week.. Another possible shocker - training when muscles are
'sore' may help speed recovery and is recommended - however you should not
train to the point of causing 'pain' (or if you are already in 'pain').
Working a muscle that is sore - even one that has been injured - will
cause the muscle to recover much more rapidly that resting the muscle -
you must know the difference between pain and soreness however - and
should not do anything that will cause pain. (If you are recovering from
an injury please be sure to follow your Doctors instructions.)

NUTRITION and SUPPLEMENTS

Nutrition is a very important part of getting 'big'. This should be very
simple to understand but still many people don't. If you want to build a
house there is one thing YOU HAVE TO HAVE - materials. If you want to
build muscle you have to feed them - plain and simple. To gain mass you
have to eat more calories than your body needs - or at least the exact
amount that it needs for energy, repair, etc. (because there is no way of
knowing your exact needs it is wise to eat a bit more than you feel you
need). If you don't YOUR MUSCLES WILL NOT GROW.

Supplements are another story. Research has shown that only drugs will
make your muscles grow beyond 'normal'. Other supplements do have their
place. It is important that your body has all the nutrients it needs - any
less will slow your progress. There may be a very slight advantage to
getting a little more of some things than your body needs - but there is
little doubt that if your body is not getting enough of something it will
hurt your progress. For example, most people are known to be deficient in
Zinc (there is not enough of it in our diets), in which case it has been
proven that supplemental Zinc will increase the testosterone levels (in
men). It has also been shown that taking twice as much as you need will
not be of benefit - and may even have adverse effects on your health.

INFORMATION

This training information is the result of over 50 years of research on
PRE - - by hundreds of researchers. They know what their talking about.
There are two important last points to make , researchers will be the
first to tell you that everything is not known about the best way to train
- but any improvements made on what is currently known - about training
methods - will be very slight. Every possible combination of training
methods (within reason), have been studied. If big improvements are to be
made in 'muscle building', it will be in areas other than training.

The PLATEAU

Now the bad news - if you train correctly you will 'level off'. The
training methods covered here have been shown to be better (produce faster
and better results), than any other researched training methods. (Again,
it is possible that slight variations will be found to have some slight
benefit). Here's what to expect - if your train correctly for maximum
growth you will make very fast gains for the first 3 to 6 months. At this
point you will gradually start to taper off - after two years of training
you can expect the gains to come very slowly - at some point, to be
totally honest, further 'overall' gains will be almost impossible unless
you take anabolic steroids or other types of anabolic drugs. (Which I do
not recommend). This does not mean that you can't continue to improve your
appearance. It is at this time that you should start paying more attention
to your weak areas, your diet, etc. - you can always improve - and hope -
that more can be learned on how to increase muscle size through natural
methods - without the use of steroids.

LAST NOTE: SHORT ON TIME?

A 1 rep max (1 RM), done once a week, (after warm up) - has been shown to
be very effective in increasing strength and size during 6 week studies.

REFERENCES

PRIMARY SOURCE:

McArdle, W.D., and Katch, F.I., and Katch, V.L., Exercise Physiology,
fourth edition, Williams and Wilkins, 1996. (includes 178 source
referencences pertaining to the above subject).

Other References:

Guyton, A.C., Function of the Human Body, fourth edition, Saunders, 1974.
Nobel, B.J., Physiology of Exercise and Sport, Times Mirror/Mosby, 1986.
Hendler, S.S., The Doctors' Vitamin and Mineral Encyclopedia, Simon and
Schuster, 1990.
Hatfield, F.C., Bodybuilding a Scientific Approach,
Contemporary, 1984.
 
Interesing article. It raises some valid pointes, but some points seem blatantly incorrect.

I can understand wanting to train several times a week if you want maximal strength with submaximal weights, in order to stimulate the nervous system.... but doing so to failure just isn't all that wise IMHO.

"- Movement should be fast (real shocker for me) "

Fast concentrics stimulate fast twitch fiber, which is are the fibers which produce the most growth.

-Zulu
 
Ok, interesting article, just a few things though...

First of all, WHAT THE HELL?

Second of all, its not the most recent study I've seen (its dated 1996 and references other material from the '70s).

I also find it interesting that despite the author's conviction and self assurance that his research is so correct and accurate, why does anyone that knows what they're talking about disagree completely with the results? I have never heard of anyone successful with a program similar to what is being suggested.

I also found it funny that it was said that you will reach a plateau and thats pretty much, nothing was suggested to get beyond the plateau.

I've never seen anything more back assward in my life...
 
Last edited:
If that's simply cut and paste then you only need to take a look at some of the grammar and spelling mistakes to realize that the author is less than adept in the field.

Also a lot of those referenced materials, in particular the McArdle, Katch, & Katch text is essentially a first year physiology text that has some applications in 400 level exercise physiology courses. Most of the Guyton texts, however, are typically very useful; most of the Guyton texts have changed minorly over the last 20 years (basically picture changes and some terminology changes).
 
ZZuluZ said:
Interesing article. It raises some valid pointes, but some points seem blatantly incorrect.

I can understand wanting to train several times a week if you want maximal strength with submaximal weights, in order to stimulate the nervous system.... but doing so to failure just isn't all that wise IMHO.

"- Movement should be fast (real shocker for me) "

Fast concentrics stimulate fast twitch fiber, which is are the fibers which produce the most growth.

-Zulu

Well, article didnt talk about going to failure.... Just increase the weights each workout.
And if you do only like 3 sets for that muscle, then why can't you work it out more often?
 
DaCypher said:
Ok, interesting article, just a few things though...

First of all, WHAT THE HELL?

Second of all, its not the most recent study I've seen (its dated 1996 and references other material from the '70s).

I also find it interesting that despite the author's conviction and self assurance that his research is so correct and accurate, why does anyone that knows what they're talking about disagree completely with the results? I have never heard of anyone successful with a program similar to what is being suggested.

I also found it funny that it was said that you will reach a plateau and thats pretty much, nothing was suggested to get beyond the plateau.

I've never seen anything more back assward in my life...

ABout the plateau. EVERYONE will reach a training point where they would not eb able to continue, thats called reaching your potential... There are small plateaus on the way, yes.... But the author talked about the reeal, the final, the end result of training....
Beleive it or not, you cannot gain muscle forever, even with steroids...
 
Any author who uses Fred Hatfield as a "scientific" reference is automatically disqualified from serious consideration on my part. Also, selective recruitment of muscle fibers is physiologically impossible. Fibers are recruited in an orderly pattern according to intensity or force requirements and not according to speed of movement.
 
Top Bottom