UA is definately not like DNP. Both have thier advantages, both have disadvantages. All together, though, UA is a much safer, albeit milder alternative.
UA is definately not like DNP. Both have thier advantages, both have disadvantages. All together, though, UA is a much safer, albeit milder alternative.
UA is definately not like DNP. Both have thier advantages, both have disadvantages. All together, though, UA is a much safer, albeit milder alternative.
From what studies do you conclude that UA is safer? There are some very knowledgeable people on the diet and anabolic board who will strongly disagree with you on that.
I agree that UA is safer, although there is little to offer in terms of using it for weight loss and in high doses. I have very little knowledge of DNP specifics other than what Duchaine has mentioned as well as what has been said here, but from my understanding there is less room for error than with UA. As for long term effects, there is really no way to know...