Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Global cooling

  • Thread starter Thread starter lartinos
  • Start date Start date
L

lartinos

Guest
Someone else posted this elswhere, figured I'd steal it.

Global Cooling: Alaskan Glaciers Grow For First Time In 250 Years

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, October 17, 2008

Plans to implement a worldwide carbon tax in the name of saving the planet from global warming have taken another blow after it was revealed that Alaskan glaciers have grown for the first time in 250 years after an abnormally cool summer.

Temperatures 3 degrees below average caused winter snow to remain for longer, prompting the increase in glacial mass, reports the Daily Tech.

“Since 1946, the USGS has maintained a research project measuring the state of Alaskan glaciers. This year saw records broken for most snow buildup. It was also the first time since any records began being that the glaciers did not shrink during the summer months,” according to the report.

The biggest shrinkage witnessed in the region occurred between 1741 and 1900, during which the glaciers lost about 15 per cent of their total mass as the earth began to exit the climatological period coined the Little Ice Age.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but CO2 spewing cars and jumbo jets were not too prevalent in the 18th and 19th centuries.

And now that the planet has naturally exited a warming trend and is heading towards a new “big chill,” as evidenced by the near complete halt in sunspot activity, the glaciers are expanding once again.

Years more growth in the Alaskan glaciers “might mark the beginning of another Little Ice Age,” notes the report.

The expansion of the glaciers follows a similar occurrence in the Arctic, which has undergone an ice cover growth twice the size of Germany in the past year, a gain of about thirteen percent following a colder than usual year.

Man-made global warming adherents have attempted to downplay such instances as aberrations that defy a wider warming trend, but in reality no global warming has been observed since at least 1999 or even 1995, as University of Finland professor Jarl R. Ahlbeck maintains.

Evidence that the planet is tip-toeing towards the onset of a new mini ice age continues to present itself following unprecedented ice storms in Kenya as well as Sydney experiencing its coldest August for 60 years.

The cold snap arrives on the back of the Sun reaching a milestone not observed in nearly 100 years - the entire month of August passed without a single sunspot being noted.

Lack of solar activity in 2008 has coincided with evidence of a cooling trend across the world.

Earlier this year, China experienced its coldest winter in 100 years while northeast America was hit by record snow levels and Britain suffered its coldest Easter in decades as late-blooming daffodils were pounded with hail and snow on an almost daily basis. The British summer also left many yearning for global warming, with temperatures in June and July rarely struggling to get over 16 degrees and on one occasion even dropping as low as 9 degrees in the middle of the afternoon.

Many parts of the U.S. suffered their coldest April on record. Canada had its third coldest April since 1970.

“Summer heat continues in short supply, continuing a trend that has dominated much of the 21st Century’s opening decade,” reports the Chicago Tribune. “There have been only 162 days 90 degrees or warmer at Midway Airport over the period from 2000 to 2008. That’s by far the fewest 90-degree temperatures in the opening nine years of any decade on record here since 1930.”

According to an Associated Press report, The Farmers Almanac is now also predicting “below-average temperatures for most of the U.S.” The publication boasts of an 85 per cent accuracy rate for its forecasts which are given two years in advance.

According to a report from the World Meteorological Organization last month, the first half of 2008 was the coolest for at least five years, adding that it may actually be the coolest since 2000.

Man-made advocates have been losing credibility in recent months on the back of bizarre proposals to fight climate change that include blocking out the sun with spaceships as well as eviscerating pristine old growth forests, despite wider evidence of a cooling trend that is just beginning to manifest itself.
 
I've always called bullshit on the global warming. It's normal to have flucuations in the temp. We had a mini ice age during the middle ages for example.
 
But is this cyclical cooling more than normal. This is the first year in the last 100 that the Sun has had zero sunspot activity. Jury is still out on climate change and our effects upon it. Until all the variables and the degree of the variables are identified, I can't make an informed opinion. If the climate is shown as a function, would the effects of the sun and cosmic rays be x^300y^250 and auto emissions be a second degree variable? I don't know. I opt for being proactive by conserving energy, reducing pollution, etc. But I do not condone the radical leftist views of the Kyoto accord.

There is anecdotal evidence that in the history of men there are large changes in mean temperature. Caves in passes in the Alps that show stone age implements and paintings, but have been covered be sheets of ice for recorded history, etc. Really, I think environmental science is a relatively new field and is troubled by not having codified rules, theorum and hypotheses. I also think both sides of the political aisle have attempted to use science to achieve their own aggrandizement.
 
I've always called bullshit on the global warming. It's normal to have flucuations in the temp. We had a mini ice age during the middle ages for example.


I've always called bullshit on people who call bullshit on global warming. It's normal to give merit to that which is unanimously agreed upon by scientists everywhere, for example.



:cow:
 
I've always called bullshit on people who call bullshit on global warming. It's normal to give merit to that which is unanimously agreed upon by scientists everywhere, for example.



:cow:

Yeah, I remember that TV special where they melted polar glacial ice and did an HPLC type test to show the chemicals in the ice.

It was shown if you melt the ice deep enough, you'd stop finding chemicals from industrial emissions in the ice.

Seemed pretty irrefutable to me
 
Yeah, I remember that TV special where they melted polar glacial ice and did an HPLC type test to show the chemicals in the ice.

It was shown if you melt the ice deep enough, you'd stop finding chemicals from industrial emissions in the ice.

Seemed pretty irrefutable to me

And? Yes it shows the presence of the chemicals in the ice, but what does that have to do with the price of k-y jelly in Indonesia?
 
Yeah, I remember that TV special where they melted polar glacial ice and did an HPLC type test to show the chemicals in the ice.

It was shown if you melt the ice deep enough, you'd stop finding chemicals from industrial emissions in the ice.

Seemed pretty irrefutable to me


Really? I haven't heard of that one. Do you know what chemicals?

One common thing is to drill x meters into the glaciers and test CO2 amounts that form over decades and centuries. But in the same way that gas/CO2 bubbles form, they could HPLC for other stuff as well.

And to emphasize once again: global warming is a misnomer. It's about global extremes, in which heating is but one manifestation.



:cow:
 
Really? I haven't heard of that one. Do you know what chemicals?

One common thing is to drill x meters into the glaciers and test CO2 amounts that form over decades and centuries. But in the same way that gas/CO2 bubbles form, they could HPLC for other stuff as well.

And to emphasize once again: global warming is a misnomer. It's about global extremes, in which heating is but one manifestation.



:cow:

I'm looking for the TV special now. The industrial gasses were greenhouses gasses as well as CO2 clearly embedded in glacial ice. Once they dud in the glacier some 10-12 feet , then the concentrations of such gasses were reduced
 
Top Bottom