Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
E
Elite_Fry
Guest
do you need lube to masturbate with a cut penis?
.jpg "Research Chemical Sciences")
.png "Research Chemical Sciences")
Circumcision - a serious discussion
- Thread starter Lestat
- Start date
scriptfactory
New member
Mandinka: The portion you posted states "The majority of pediatric surgeons in our area... etc..." It doesn't say the majority of surgeons in Germany.
I should have written, "I am against causing babies unnecessary pain but and uncut dick looks like shit."
Smegma is the buildup of dead skin cells, etc. I have never licked that, sorry. And what the hell does licking pussy have to do with never having sex again!?
My son has no foreskin left.
I should have written, "I am against causing babies unnecessary pain but and uncut dick looks like shit."
Smegma is the buildup of dead skin cells, etc. I have never licked that, sorry. And what the hell does licking pussy have to do with never having sex again!?
My son has no foreskin left.
Mandinka2
New member
You're right - I don't care about YOUR penis. Cut it right off... go ahead..use a plastibell...according to scriptwhatever it won't even hurt !spongebob said:
I do care about a child's sexual integrity...especially when it has no choice in what others are doing to it. That is the point. Genius.
shall I send you W-2s and SAT scores? How about college diplomas?spongebob said:
Don't take me the wrong way, there are people smarter then me that make more money, but the vast majority of the world doesn't have a fucking clue is my point.
It gets tiring, seeing everything in life catered to the lowest common denominator.
E
Elite_Fry
Guest
will girls like me more if im circumssied?
Mandinka2
New member
scriptfactory said:
Of course the guy was only goin on what he knew about his professional colleagues.
What is so NECCESSARY about circumcision ?
Smegma is a natural secretion from the clit and adjoining areas...you can't lick a clit without getting some smegma...even a circumcised kid produces smegma...it just falls away since it has nowhere to build up. You said you never wanted to have smegma on your dick but if u fucked a pussy...guess what ? HELLO!
B
BrothaBill
Guest
Lestat said:
Every bit of skin has nerve endings, removing tissue from the penis in a circumcision does not affect sexual appreciation if done correctly in any appreciable manner. Anyone that claims otherwise is biased. Links to medical literature that backs up the six square inches claim. Im not talking some website that has a bug up their ass about circumcisions. Im talking something that I would turn to look up professional medical queries. Lets throw out the talking points
No, not what I assume you are saying, certainly we can break it down to GCAT and build from there, but that is a poor endevour on your part, foreskin does not equal clitorus, I warn you to not try and argue that, Ill smoke you foo, just like being up a kindergartner if you continue down that path, tatoo it to your dick...foreskin is not the male equivalent of the clitorus period!!!
Yeah, are we going to argue nerve endings here, since nerve endings are everywhere in the skin with the least in the skin of the elbow, lets break it down to DNA sequencing. That makes more sense, I can at least argue that and make a better point on sexual organs
Not the ones Ive met at least
The clitorus is described by most as a evolutional redundant penis
Wrong
Thats where we disagree, having a foreskin or not having one, who really cares, it doesnt affect the person in any appreciable way. Its a preference, thats all. The argument for female mutilation of the clitorus and hood is to prevent to experience the enjoyment of sex. Its to prevent them from having a reason to cheat on their husbands. These are done in the most brutal and oppresive societies that subjugate women and treat them like cattle with little or no rights. The same cultures that also have honor killings where if the female of the family goes astray it is to the honor of the family to have her brothers, father, uncles, cousins kill her to maintain honor. The sociological differences alone involved with female mutilation are enormous. I cannot believe Lestat that you are being intellectually honest about comparing the two. I mean, cmon, really, so you like foreskins. But do you actually know what is wholistically involved with what you are comparing and contrasting, I know you do. I think that you are arguing folly but Id be interested to see you make those comparisons. Trust me, you cannot win that debate, but itd be a spirited exercise in reason if youd like. Im in an unusual mood as of late.
Links please, I fail to see how anyone with a clue could surmise that having a circumcision would prevent masturbation. Sounds like some garbage off an anticircumcision website. Lets not talk junk science here.
Like most issues, I really couldnt care less but it is endlessly hilarious watching people distort truths and reality to build their argument for change, theyve learned the principles of marketing it seems. Marketing and "selling" their ideas with half truths. Circumcision is a simple medical procedure and done for aesthetic reasons, its that simple. There is nothing more. There are more direct thought experiments to understand cultures and societies and the silliness of societal norms than to use circumcisions as the core issue to flush out the sociological debate. But if you want to, hey, whatever
Similar threads
