sawastea New member Apr 19, 2006 #1 I thought the reasoning was for bandwidth. Anywho, which is better? Bumping an old, relevant thread or starting a new one though there are older, relevant threads out there?
I thought the reasoning was for bandwidth. Anywho, which is better? Bumping an old, relevant thread or starting a new one though there are older, relevant threads out there?
sawastea New member Apr 19, 2006 #4 Re: I was always told that "bumping old threads" was better than "starting a new one" Kakdiesel said: i really like you a lot. Click to expand... mama knows child... blut wump said: Start a new one and link back to the old ones. Click to expand...
Re: I was always told that "bumping old threads" was better than "starting a new one" Kakdiesel said: i really like you a lot. Click to expand... mama knows child... blut wump said: Start a new one and link back to the old ones. Click to expand...
Kakdiesel Banned Apr 19, 2006 #5 Re: I was always told that "bumping old threads" was better than "starting a new one" sawastea said: mama knows child... Click to expand... stop teasing with your avatar
Re: I was always told that "bumping old threads" was better than "starting a new one" sawastea said: mama knows child... Click to expand... stop teasing with your avatar
sawastea New member Apr 19, 2006 #6 Why are you awake at 7:22 a.m.?!? It's not like you have anything to do today.
pintoca New member Apr 19, 2006 #7 Re: I was always told that "bumping old threads" was better than "starting a new one" sawastea said: Why are you awake at 7:22 a.m.?!? It's not like you have anything to do today. Click to expand... or anyday
Re: I was always told that "bumping old threads" was better than "starting a new one" sawastea said: Why are you awake at 7:22 a.m.?!? It's not like you have anything to do today. Click to expand... or anyday
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
.jpg "Research Chemical Sciences")
.png "Research Chemical Sciences")
