Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Research Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsResearch Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic

98% polled support retalliation, *92% support full war

Holy shit he is back!
 
look at it this ways 2thick when a lib. dem. like Diane Finestien is advocating war then you can bet your ass MOST of us want blood!
 
WODIN said:
look at it this ways 2thick when a lib. dem. like Diane Finestien is advocating war then you can bet your ass MOST of us want blood!

War....

Hmmmmm.....

More dead people....hmmmm

Does anyone remember Vietnam? Multiply that by 1 million and you have this war you speak of.

Americans are seriously mentally handicapped if they think killing more people will help anything.

Missile and strategic military bombings are a wiser choice.
 
That's why we have big bombs that hit targets from long distances.
 
Sorry 2Thick but I think we should start by nuking all of Afganistan and work our way back through the Middle East.
 
You can declare war and not invade. It sounds like you are equating war with a full-scale invasion. We can declare war and fight strategically with well-targeted missiles, bombs, etc.

I wouldn't be opposed to an invasion, though, so long as the culprit is found to be a country, or a group supported or harbored by a country.

Your estimate of Vietnam * 1 million is total overkill bro. Maybe if this became WW3, but not war with a small country with no nuclear capability.
 
Top Bottom