KIAN New member Aug 23, 2005 #2 It depends what you are trying to achieve. SAN Full Impact BOLT - creatine based recovery agent - 5 grams per 12 gram serving - 0 calories - 0 carbs - 0 sugars - contains aspartame BSN CellMass - a creatine ethyl ester malate supplement - 3 grams per 16 gram serving - 38 calories - 9.5 grams carbs - 0 grams sugar - contains sucralose You are likely to experience the effects more, if any, from the SAN product. Welcome to EF _______________________ KP--Fitness Basics .
It depends what you are trying to achieve. SAN Full Impact BOLT - creatine based recovery agent - 5 grams per 12 gram serving - 0 calories - 0 carbs - 0 sugars - contains aspartame BSN CellMass - a creatine ethyl ester malate supplement - 3 grams per 16 gram serving - 38 calories - 9.5 grams carbs - 0 grams sugar - contains sucralose You are likely to experience the effects more, if any, from the SAN product. Welcome to EF _______________________ KP--Fitness Basics .
NorgePrecision New member Aug 24, 2005 #3 San products are the shit and that is all. Stick with them.
Turanabol New member Aug 30, 2005 #6 If I had to choose BSN but all it is CEE and Glutamine AAKG. I buy both in bulk for about 70% less. Can't beat it. PS both companies are turning into the next "Muscletech" clones.
If I had to choose BSN but all it is CEE and Glutamine AAKG. I buy both in bulk for about 70% less. Can't beat it. PS both companies are turning into the next "Muscletech" clones.
O OMEGA New member Aug 30, 2005 #7 disagree they both seem to be on the good side of the line quality and results at a fair price SAN being the more cost effective and scientific while BSN tends to have more unusual yet potent items
disagree they both seem to be on the good side of the line quality and results at a fair price SAN being the more cost effective and scientific while BSN tends to have more unusual yet potent items