25homes EF MOD Moderator Chairman Member EF VIP EF Logger May 10, 2006 #3 THat would be a good way to look at staying on always..
M Mr.X Guest May 10, 2006 #5 curling said: Well, does the rule still apply? Hmmm? Click to expand... no...but common sense would tell you that 20 year cycles are unreasonable unless for TRT/HRT purposes.
curling said: Well, does the rule still apply? Hmmm? Click to expand... no...but common sense would tell you that 20 year cycles are unreasonable unless for TRT/HRT purposes.
Stryker1992 Well-known member May 10, 2006 #7 curling said: Well, does the rule still apply? Hmmm? Click to expand... you are a sick mother fucker, but i like it!!!!
curling said: Well, does the rule still apply? Hmmm? Click to expand... you are a sick mother fucker, but i like it!!!!
letsrun4it New member May 11, 2006 #8 i think it sort of applies...not 20 years/20 years but i think you're probably ok going 1 year on and then if you really did take a full year off... it wouldnt be as effective as cycling 3 times probably
i think it sort of applies...not 20 years/20 years but i think you're probably ok going 1 year on and then if you really did take a full year off... it wouldnt be as effective as cycling 3 times probably
Juicta New member May 11, 2006 #10 You can do it just make sure you have a liver doner ready, O and maybe a heart muscle, kidneys, maybe even a brain... Fuck it bro just get a new everything on hand before you attempt this... LOL
You can do it just make sure you have a liver doner ready, O and maybe a heart muscle, kidneys, maybe even a brain... Fuck it bro just get a new everything on hand before you attempt this... LOL