Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
.jpg "Research Chemical Sciences")
.png "Research Chemical Sciences")
Simple Question - Test Prop 400mg/week OR Sus 250 750mg/week?
- Thread starter rosco141
- Start date
msam76
New member
Test prop is good if water retention and bloating is a concern for you. Only problem is it is in and out of your system in like 3 days. generally have to inject at least 100mg EOD to keep levels constant. I do not know about sus 250 personally. Here's a site with some good info on test: for sust. http://www.mmsfitness.com/steroids/profiles/sustanon-250.htm
prop: http://www.mmsfitness.com/steroids/profiles/propionate.htm
prop: http://www.mmsfitness.com/steroids/profiles/propionate.htm
rosco141 said:
Done them both. Like test prop.
- More for the buck
- Felt and saw the results
The trick is to get good quality prop so you do not have painful injections and irritation at site. Romanian/Russian in glute with 25 g fits the bill.
I don't understand why the dosage in question is not 1:1 for prop vs Sust.
500mg prop or 500mg Sust should show great results. The Sust will continue on after you stop for 2-3 weeks.
Mach250
New member
In my experience Sust has brought on more overall mass but a smoother look from additional water retention (even with AI). Prop on the other had provides a leaner gain with noticeably less water retention and faster results. If you can deal with EOD jabs then I would go with Prop, you won't regret it.
PS 750mg of Sust vs 400mg of Prop you will obviously see more mass with the higher dose.
PS 750mg of Sust vs 400mg of Prop you will obviously see more mass with the higher dose.
A
ALIN
Guest
You could do either with success.
synthazeus
New member
Go prop it kicks in way more and way faster and the gains will be leaner and quicker.
DocToxin8
New member
As far as differences is ester weight, without actually calculating the mass of the enanthate & prop ester,
I beleieve the diffirences are that ca 20% of the test prop will be ester, and 30% of the enanthate.
400mg test prop is 320mg actual testosterone. Sustanon is a blend, but both test phenylpropionate, isocaproate and decaonate have from 30-39% ester weight.
So 750mg sust is ca 487mg actual test (when doing an approximation of 35% ester weight total)
Which would mean in theory that 750g sust should provide more bang than 400mg prop, but not that much.
Whether there are differences that come from the absorbtion pattern of test prop vs sust,
msam76 has a good point about water retention, since prop is so much faster both in and out,
it may cause less water rentention than the long actin tests.
Thats probably because with long actin test you eventually reach higher blood levels (most of the time),
than with the prop that will deliver more of a spike, and then let blood levels down again before next spike.
I beleieve the diffirences are that ca 20% of the test prop will be ester, and 30% of the enanthate.
400mg test prop is 320mg actual testosterone. Sustanon is a blend, but both test phenylpropionate, isocaproate and decaonate have from 30-39% ester weight.
So 750mg sust is ca 487mg actual test (when doing an approximation of 35% ester weight total)
Which would mean in theory that 750g sust should provide more bang than 400mg prop, but not that much.
Whether there are differences that come from the absorbtion pattern of test prop vs sust,
msam76 has a good point about water retention, since prop is so much faster both in and out,
it may cause less water rentention than the long actin tests.
Thats probably because with long actin test you eventually reach higher blood levels (most of the time),
than with the prop that will deliver more of a spike, and then let blood levels down again before next spike.
Similar threads
