Posted by LittleBigMan on March 18, 1997 at 12:16:29:
In Reply to: Expectations posted by Crescent City on March 18, 1997 at 11:35:57:
: I expected more and I expected something sooner than 7 weeks. Was I wrong in expecting that? In fact, I've gotten better gains off of creatine and even kept more after going off the creatine. I know that the Norandren would have been better stacked with something but I had access to nothing else. Now I'm at the end of the 2nd bottle and I'm curious as to what I should be looking for next. I had thought that perhaps I should take some time off but with only two weeks of what seems like progress, I'm not sure that a break is necessary.
: BTW - I'm 35 years old, 6'3", 233lbs, about 9-10% bodyfat (calipers), training for 12 years.
Let me preface this by saying that not everyone reacts to the same stuff the same way, so maybe you are just
Almost sounds as if you got fake stuff.. but lets think here a bit. You are a pretty big guy to begin with, so you
would probably need more than a 160 lb beginner. A "good" dosage for deca has reported as being about 2 mg/lb of
body weight per week. That would be 466 mg for you. (yeah, its a bit high for a beginner, you should be able to make
gains with considerably less, but lets go on..)
Assuming Norandren is actually about 35 mg / cc, you'd need up to around 13 cc per week.. ouch! Thats why this weak
dilute stuff can suck, but like you said, sometimes you gotta use whatever you can get your hands on.
You might do better by doing some Sust, or stacking the deca with an oral like Dbol.
Hey, thats why one should go light on the first cycle, to see how that particular substance affects you. In you case,
ASSUMING IT IS REAL, it looks like you will need more than just that.