Re: Clen going down hill ??
Posted by LittleBigMan on March 14, 1997 at 13:22:12:
In Reply to: Re: Clen going down hill ?? posted by APF on March 14, 1997 at 13:08:40:
: : According to the March issue of MMK2, clen is no longer 'in'. It was the 'fashion' drug among bodybuilders since late 80's but now its consumption is decreasing among U.S. bb's. Shaky hands, lack of effectiveness, etc, might be counted as the lead reasons for its decline. The mag also suggests that even its fat-burning and muscle-building properties aren't really proved.
: : I can't really understand MMK2 behavior: they were hyping clen for ages, and now try to convince everyone that it's just bogus. Sounds like DEA's infomertial. I've tried clen myself, along with cytomel, and it does work, at least as fat-burner ...
: I can understand this; most people IMO are drawn to Clen because it is "illegal", and therefore 'must' be better than anything else. This is of course not always the case - I've tried Clen, and find that E/C/A was just as good if not better wrt fat burning (for me). And even better, it's legal for me to buy, use, and possess; I can even sell it and publicly recommend others use it with no social reprocussions =]. DNP too is not illegal, and I can assure you of its' potency as well.
: So the point is valid - why go through the trouble, breaking the law to buy it if it is on the same level wrt fat burning as a perfectly acceptable and legal supplement?
ECA better than Clen? Hmmmmm don't know about that.. maybe in the long run, since ECA can enhance BAT production etc etc...
For a cycle of a few weeks, Clen is better. You are the first I have heard say the opposite, but then again
everyone is different I guess. ( I DO like ECA however! )