Re: Clen going down hill ??
Posted by WG on March 14, 1997 at 13:21:52:
In Reply to: Re: Clen going down hill ?? posted by APF on March 14, 1997 at 13:08:40:
: I can understand this; most people IMO are drawn to Clen because it is "illegal", and therefore 'must' be better than anything else. This is of course not always the case - I've tried Clen, and find that E/C/A was just as good if not better wrt fat burning (for me). And even better, it's legal for me to buy, use, and possess; I can even sell it and publicly recommend others use it with no social reprocussions =]. DNP too is not illegal, and I can assure you of its' potency as well.
: So the point is valid - why go through the trouble, breaking the law to buy it if it is on the same level wrt fat burning as a perfectly acceptable and legal supplement?
Yeah, but they saying that clen's properties aren't proved sound a little biased. Even before clen became used as human medication, many veterinary studies where done, pointing to the same fact: the drug had the ability to improve muscle mass, while decreasing fat mass. I also use ECA stack (with real ephedrine sulfate, not Ma Huang) and it's usefull. But for me clen is unbeatable as fat-burning agent.