Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
.jpg "Research Chemical Sciences")
.png "Research Chemical Sciences")
I think this is a bad idea because what I read is the Osta and LGD binds to the same muscle anabolic receptors than AAS.
If you always sacrify your lipids, cholesterol, blood pressure, hair, etc etc to have AAS in your blood to bind the receptors, if the receptors are already budy with LGD and Osta it would be stupid.
Osta is a good choice for pct or off cycle and ldg is made to be taken on trt or off cycle but at a lower dose to recover fast the HPTA.
If you always sacrify your lipids, cholesterol, blood pressure, hair, etc etc to have AAS in your blood to bind the receptors, if the receptors are already budy with LGD and Osta it would be stupid.
Osta is a good choice for pct or off cycle and ldg is made to be taken on trt or off cycle but at a lower dose to recover fast the HPTA.
oxbow is right about how SARMs aren't needed on an anabolic steroid cycle. Anabolic steroids aren't selective - causing them to affect your organs too. Because SARMs are selective, you defeat the purpose of using SARMs when stacking them with steroids. LGD makes for a nice standalone cycle if you ever decide to use it though.
