I considered the same thing with half a 10mg Dianabol - methandrostenolone - in the morning. Then I thought "why not use turinabol as a bridge?".
Having used Turanabol on it's own for my first
cycle (once upon a time), and knowing that it doesn't aromatize, I wondered if this would make a better bridging choice. It has a longer half-life than Dianabol - methandrostenolone - - is it the very short half-life of Dianabol - methandrostenolone - which makes it suitable to take in small doses in the morning when bridging?
Turanabol would seem to cause less suppression than Dianabol - methandrostenolone - , because estrogens inhibit recovery of the hpta - hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis - a lot. Also, I like turinabol much more than dianabol, I consider it an improved "dianabol 2.0".
I'd like your opinions - Turanabol or Dianabol - methandrostenolone - as a low-dose morning
PCT bridge? Like everyone, I have hundreds of Dianabol - methandrostenolone - pills, and a load of winstrols.
(A bit about me - I'm 43 years old, 20+ years of weight training under my belt, and a chemist with a special interest in sports supplementation. Currently 2 weeks into a 10 week 500mg
test cypionate
cycle with a 3 week Turanabol (50mg
ED) kickstart)