Re: Anti-aromatase... proviron


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Elite Fitness Anabolic Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Dr L on February 14, 1997 at 10:02:18:

In Reply to: Re: Anti-aromatase... proviron posted by UNABOMBER ATTN DR. L.!!! on February 13, 1997 at 17:04:43:

: : : From my experience, it seems that Nolvadex, while able to prevent water
: : : retention during a heavy steroid cycle, seems to slow down or reduce
: : : results in muscle growth. Now, there are other anti-armoatases around. In
: : : particular, I am talking about proviron.
: : Although proviron has never been
: : : an androgen that is known for causing dramatic or indeed any increases in
: : : strength and/or muscle mass, it has been used successfully, or so I've
: : : heard as a water retention preventer. Since it is an androgen, I would
: : : think that it may contribute to muscle growth instead of reduce it like
: : : nolvadex, but another line of argument is that as an androgen, it would
: : : compete for or down-regulate androgen receptors, thus rendering the other
: : : steroids less effective, while not causing much in terms of muscle growth
: : : itself. Does anyone have an opinion on this? I have no problem causing
: : : muscle growth, and do not mind holding water while doing it, but right
: : : now, the bloat is going out of control.

: : : Asia

: : -Don't believe all what you read or hear form AS user
: : Proviron is not really an anti oestrogen
: : Proviron is an androgen without any interaction on the
: : female hormone level (it doesn't aromatize itself) and
: : on the hypophyse. SO because it increases the free testosterone level
: : and doesn't raise the oestrogen level THE EFFECT of
: : female hormone is reduced.
: : That is to say that the ratio female hormone /free male hormone is reduced
: : because the free male hormone is increased and not the female hormone level
: : The female hormone level is not decreased !
: : (Proviron is not used to cure ovary or breast cancer)

: : -Proviron doesn't cause any water retention, that's the (main) reason why
: : the mass gains after a cycle(10-12 weeks) of proviron are less important than
: : for others AS

: : If you want absolutely stack Proviron with another AS, use it
: : with a low androgen one

: : 10 weeks -12 weeks for a cycle of AS is the worst situation

: : The most efficient in terms of lean mass gain vs side effects and receptors downgrading is
: : low dose for more than 6 months (like in the medical field)
: : or high dose for less than 3 weeks (like used by world class athletes
: : to avoid detection, visible side effects)

: :You mention that a high dose for less than three weeks is an ideal method of taking steroids. I was wondering if it would be feasable to expect any results if I did the following: Went across the border into Mexico, bought a large quantity of some long acting steroids like Sostenon 250 and Laurabolin and injected the large quantity all at once, then returned to the US. How much can a person inject in one day while remaining reasonably safe? 5cc's, 15cc's, how much? Also, could you tell me what you think one might expirience as far as results from a method like this. Thanks!!

: PS Cajun, I already know you think this method sucks, so you don't need to reply.

: :
: :
High dose doesn't mean a huge dose once a time
It means frequent normal dose according to
some medical parameters
Two different users don't receive the same dose
I don't advice this method for an amateur
which is not helped by a physician because it's very
technical
For hormonal replacement, the best method is a long
period of use
For pure doping i'm afraid that nothing can match
this method. Just look at the sprinter , how is it
possible to run faster and faster with a meeting( a control)
each month ?
Atheletes and physicians have learned since Ben Johnson




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Elite Fitness Anabolic Board ] [ FAQ ]